Follow us on twitter! twitter.com/archdaily

Brione House / Wespi de Meuron

By Nico Saieh — Filed under: Houses , Selected , , ,
 

Architects: Markus Wespi Jérôme de Meuron architects
Location: Brione sopra Minusio, TI, Switzerland
Construction Supervision: Guscetti Arch. Dipl., 6648 Minusio
Engineer: Anastasi SA, 6604 Locarno
Building Physics: IFEC Consulenze SA, 6802 Rivera
Contractor: Merlini + Ferrari SA, 6648 Minusio
Carpenter: Erich Keller AG, 8583 Sulgen
Project year: 2004-2005
Photographs: Hannes Henz


The new building is located in a privileged but sprawled urban area above Locarno, with an overwhelming view on the city, the surrounding mountains and the lake.

The project is a discrete reaction to a daily subject: to build into a crowded and chaotic urbanized area.
Therefore all attributes of a classical house were totally omitted.

Two simple steaning cubes are emerging from the hill – fragmentarily – more associated to the landscape than to the other existing buildings – more alike a wall than a house – and time less.

Habitable interiors are generated through cavities.
Two similar big openings, with wooden grids serving as moveable gates, are providing access and view.

Additional light is taken in through courtyards.
The water of the swimming pool, embedded in the valley facing cube, merges perfectly with the lake.

 

53 comments »

John Maher says:

that is nice. that has made my day, thank you Meuron

 
# January 28, 2009 at 09:24
Rokas says:

It’s a pity,there’s no site plan.And there’s not enought photos to understand why you must go down the road with your car?Why it cant stay above?Photos of the interior is clean, honest, theres a lot of air.
I’ve liked the ceilings expecially…

 
# January 28, 2009 at 10:36
... says:

One word: Sensitivity … any plans?

 
# January 28, 2009 at 13:52
brianbuchalski says:

Very nice. Amazing how good architecture can look when it’s built to last.

 
# January 28, 2009 at 14:05

Awesome. So peaceful and secure. I’m sure whoever lives there understands what a privileged position they occupy. Really nice.

http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com

 
# January 28, 2009 at 14:30
joel says:

beautiful spaces, and sharp lines. great attention to the physical and aesthic role natural light can play in design. a real pleasure to look at and it gives me a true appreciation for architecture. however, it only seems habitable for James Bond henchman.

 
# January 28, 2009 at 17:16
raúl says:

very good

sometimes I think that the importance of the materials used in the works has been completely forgotten. but in this case it seems that it has been put in first place, what is an exaggeration in my opinion and can be unsupportable to live a long time in that place

 
# January 28, 2009 at 23:57
Agentvlin says:

Pushpullbar.com has a good thread on this house. It includes a sketchup model for those interested (registration and participation require).

 
# January 29, 2009 at 01:44
christos says:

a beautiful house, amazing architecture using only a few traditional materials but very modern too!!

 
# January 29, 2009 at 05:12
m says:

nice architecture. if i were the client, i would want atleast some small windows from the bedrooms, preferably to the side where the pool is. i know it would change the front facade, but having only skylight in the bedrooms when there’s such a nice view into the valley would be sad for me.
also i question the waste of built-up space between the pool and the garage…

 
# January 29, 2009 at 05:59
simon says:

Great detail, materiality, timeless concept etc. as everyone mentioned above. There is today often an over-provision of window openings, glazing, and cheap views. However I think this project is bordering on being a bit wastefull of its site in its very restrained (albeit thoughtful) treatment of framed views.

 
# January 29, 2009 at 09:45
tangent says:

Rokas: Even though there is no siteplan, it’s very easy to get a feel for the site by looking at the section. Putting the car access to the lowest point puts it out of the way, not blocking the views, or making the plan too deep.

 
# January 29, 2009 at 10:41

what a beautiful house. very subtle light works.
Is him Pier de Meuron’s brother or something?

 
# January 29, 2009 at 11:13
Arman says:

Wow! I love this house! I’ve never heard of this architect before. What a good way to discover a new, amazing practice! (At least for me). Thanks ArchDaily!

 
# January 29, 2009 at 12:39
Virginia says:

Extremely sensitive. Sculptural. I feel the stonework has been lovingly hand selected.

 
# January 29, 2009 at 13:19
Thonas says:

Beautiful house, but why enclose the bedrooms with a tall wall making a “courtyard” of what could have been a terrasse with a lovely view and even more light??! Thats just plain stupid!! If I was the client i would have demanded that wall be removed, and even laughed some at the architects.

 
# January 29, 2009 at 13:37
Keomi says:

A fabulous piece of architectural art, but who would want to live there? First thing I’d do is build a terrace on the roof to take advantage of the views.

 
# January 29, 2009 at 18:30
Lite says:

Extremely sensitive. So honest. One of the best projects i’ve seen in a while! Congratulations!

 
# January 30, 2009 at 08:32
Rokas says:

Partially agree with Thonas-It would be interesting to know why theres no views of the fabulous surrounding?To TANGENT-theres only 1 windoe to the outside-so they could do anything without blocking the view.The question appeared because the all the project is very well thought-through-and maybe it was made by reason?

 
# January 30, 2009 at 13:51
jambo says:

beautiful, not a word you can often use…but here i think its applicable

 
# January 30, 2009 at 20:44
Ghassan Haddad says:

i love it

 
# February 2, 2009 at 15:00
preetty sandhu says:

this is such a sensitive and honest piece of work I’ve seen in awhile.
its comforting to see the use of stone, lines, shadows and structure in a way that provides security instead of authority , arrogance and stark coldness. bravo

 
# February 4, 2009 at 14:44
Dimitri says:

Stunning. It looks homely, natural but also clean.

I’d happily live there!

 
# February 4, 2009 at 20:09
Le Corbusier says:

Didn’t realize how much I missed stone masonry in architecture, and its celebrated so tastefully, augmented by clear lines. Though I can sympathize with the poster who questioned the lack of windows. Again though, it achieves a certain monolithic sort of authority by not being so pierced.

 
# February 4, 2009 at 21:25
Parrish says:

I view this residence in the tradition of old stone residences. This home is a beautiful rendition of a modern contemporary castle. I have never liked the idea of living in a castle due to their “cold” nature, however this home makes a wonderful modern argument to the contrary. Well done.

 
# February 9, 2009 at 21:11
utopian robot says:

I don’t know why people have such an issue w/ the lack of windows. There is plenty of natural daylight and a good opening in the kitchen. There is also a pool and suitable OUTDOOR space in which to take in the surrounding landscape. Architecture is more than just “spectacular views” and this project demonstrates that quite well.

 
# March 5, 2009 at 10:44
    anavic says:

    I’m going to ask you a question so you can answer to yourself:

    What would you prefear to see by you bedroom’s window at the morning: a huge lake surrounded by mountains or an indirectly iluminated wall with just one poor plant?

     
    # October 21, 2009 at 10:48
Lucas Gray says:

I love designing with materiality driving the process. Great house!

 
# April 25, 2009 at 03:58
james webb says:

martin, it is Pierre’s cousin.

 
# May 26, 2009 at 15:11
Kythe says:

I wonder if the lack of windows, contrasted with the one massive window out to the view in the main living space, might in fact prevent one from becoming imune to the beauty of the surroundings? I imagine busying myself with my miriad tasks up stairs, only to come down stairs to be caught by surprise by the beauty of where i lived..

 
# June 11, 2009 at 20:52
daiber says:

you can be naked all day long in these house withaout the risk of neighbours notice it.

It’s like they are trying to be Zumthor in some way

 
# June 19, 2009 at 08:19

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

and I thought the Postmodernism movement was dead…[+]
i think the basic idea breaking the appartments in puzzle like pieces to form unit,...[+]
love the picts, it has an ethereal quality to it for sure.[+]
From Dusk Till Dawn[+]
David Basulto on Rosa Muerta / Robert Stone:
Why not? If the author wants to decorate it that way, it’s ok. Actually, I...[+]
Haven’t a clue. I was unable to force myself to care enough to finish his novella....[+]
It is good– better than jurgen meyer: simpler...[+]
A pretentious, egotistical blowhard, and in the field of architecture? How utterly...[+]
I fully understand that it is not just about the building. I fully understand the idea,...[+]
I like the stair and the external view I can’t imagine the spaces...[+]
The building is beautiful. But it’s not about the building only… its about...[+]
Stourley Kracklite on 4 Houses / On Office:
I like purism as well as the next guy, so I am very interested in how the...[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »