<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:webfeeds="http://webfeeds.org/rss/1.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Tag: jeremy-till | ArchDaily</title>
    <description>ArchDaily | Broadcasting Architecture Worldwide</description>
    <link>https://www.archdaily.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.archdaily.com/show.xml"/>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <webfeeds:logo>https://assets.adsttc.com/doodles/archdaily-logo-feedly.svg</webfeeds:logo>
    <webfeeds:accentColor>026CB6</webfeeds:accentColor>
    <webfeeds:analytics id="UA-73308-12" engine="GoogleAnalytics"/>
    <item>
      <title>
        <![CDATA[What Is Co-Creation in Architecture and Urban Planning?]]>
      </title>
      <link>https://www.archdaily.com/992363/what-is-co-creation-in-the-context-of-architecture-and-urban-planning</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Maria-Cristina Florian</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.archdaily.com/992363/what-is-co-creation-in-the-context-of-architecture-and-urban-planning</guid>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In recent years, the term “co-creation,” a buzzword in the business and management sector, has made its way into the architecture and urban planning discourse. The term<em> </em>is used to define a large concept that describes working intentionally with others to create something jointly. But architecture is already the result of a collaboration between multiple actors, architects, clients, investors, developers, and local administration, to name a few. Can the term still apply to this field, can it bring forth new forms of knowledge, and does it differ from the concept of participatory design?</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
      </content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://images.adsttc.com/media/images/6376/1d6f/62d1/0b26/0f75/e31c/newsletter/what-is-co-creation-in-the-context-of-architecture-and-urban-planning_7.jpg?1668685171"></enclosure>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <![CDATA[The Expert Citizen: A Change of Perspectives in Participatory Design]]>
      </title>
      <link>https://www.archdaily.com/983107/the-expert-citizen-a-change-of-perspectives-in-participatory-design</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Maria-Cristina Florian</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.archdaily.com/983107/the-expert-citizen-a-change-of-perspectives-in-participatory-design</guid>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Participatory design is a democratic process that aims to offer equal input for all stakeholders, with a particular focus on the users, not usually involved directly in the traditional method of spatial creation. The idea is based on the argument that engaging the user in the process of designing spaces can have a positive impact on the reception of those spaces. It eases the process of appropriation, helps create representative and valuable spaces, and thus creates resiliency within the urban and rural environment.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
      </content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://images.adsttc.com/media/images/6620/6369/219c/512f/f21c/3876/newsletter/the-expert-citizen-a-change-of-perspectives-in-participatory-design_10.jpg?1713398640"></enclosure>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <![CDATA[Call for Papers: Bracket [On Sharing]]]>
      </title>
      <link>https://www.archdaily.com/887608/call-for-papers-bracket-on-sharing</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rene Submissions</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.archdaily.com/887608/call-for-papers-bracket-on-sharing</guid>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Sharing is one of the humanity&rsquo;s most basic traits; we intrinsically recognize the benefits of pooling resources within a community in order take advantage of varied abilities and access in order to fulfill needs. Sharing is the key driver behind civilization&rsquo;s move towards collective living &ndash; first in small settlements and eventually in megalopoleis. The impact of sharing goes beyond simply satisfying the necessities for survival and extends itself into the social and cultural dimensions of our communities. In constructing an urban commons, composed of collectively managed and shared resources, we shape our physical, social, and cultural environments</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
      </content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://images.adsttc.com/media/images/5a67/49f0/f197/cc69/0100/03b7/newsletter/open-uri20180123-21405-bbfo4v.jpg?1516718559"></enclosure>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <![CDATA[A Brief History of the Impoverished Culture of Architectural Research]]>
      </title>
      <link>https://www.archdaily.com/876901/a-brief-history-of-the-impoverished-culture-of-architectural-research</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard Buday</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.archdaily.com/876901/a-brief-history-of-the-impoverished-culture-of-architectural-research</guid>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>This article was originally published by <a href="/tag/common-edge">Common Edge</a> as "<a href="http://commonedge.org/the-confused-and-impoverished-state-of-architectural-research/?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=archdaily.com" target="_blank">The Confused and Impoverished State of Architectural Research</a>."</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
      </content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://images.adsttc.com/media/images/5980/ee1c/b22e/3898/8e00/01f4/newsletter/confusion-via-enlightenbrains.jpg?1501621785"></enclosure>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <![CDATA[Architectural Research: Three Myths and One Model]]>
      </title>
      <link>https://www.archdaily.com/802766/architectural-research-three-myths-and-one-model</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeremy Till</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.archdaily.com/802766/architectural-research-three-myths-and-one-model</guid>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>Jeremy Till's paper "Architectural Research: Three Myths and One Model" was originally commissioned by the Royal Institute of British Architects (<a href="http://www.archdaily.com/tag/riba">RIBA</a>) Research Committee, and published in 2007. In the past decade, however, it has grown in popularity not just in the UK, but around the world to become a canonical paper on architectural research. In order to help the paper reach new audiences, here Till presents an edited version of the original. The original was previously published <a href="https://www.architecture.com/files/ribaprofessionalservices/researchanddevelopment/whatisarchitecturalresearch.pdf?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=archdaily.com" target="_blank">on RIBA's research portal</a> and <a href="https://jeremytill.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/post/attachment/34/2007_Three_Myths_and_One_Model.pdf?utm_medium=website&amp;utm_source=archdaily.com" target="_blank">on Jeremy Till's own website</a>.</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
      </content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://images.adsttc.com/media/images/586b/9216/e58e/ce47/9100/00f1/newsletter/ICD-ITKE_RP13-14_Image08.jpg?1483444747"></enclosure>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
        <![CDATA[Distributing Power: Jeremy Till on the Complex Necessity of Participatory Urbanism]]>
      </title>
      <link>https://www.archdaily.com/782319/distributing-power-jeremy-till-on-the-complex-necessity-of-participatory-urbanism</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MONU Magazine</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.archdaily.com/782319/distributing-power-jeremy-till-on-the-complex-necessity-of-participatory-urbanism</guid>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><em>As a profession with the power to alter people's cities and neighborhoods - and indeed therefore their lives - architecture is often a controversial business to be involved in; many members of the public have learned to be suspicious of any plans for development in places they care about, often turning architecture into a villain to be fought. One proposed solution to this conundrum is to include public participation as much as possible, but many architects are skeptical of such an approach. At a time when the responsibilities of architects are being eroded by engineers and project managers, what would be left to architects if the public is allowed control over the design? </em><em>Seeking to understand this challenge, in this interview from <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/775935/monu-magazine-number-23-participatory-urbanism" target="_blank">MONU Magazine's latest issue on "Participatory Urbanism,"</a> Bernd Upmeyer speaks to Jeremy Till, a British Architect, writer and educator who has written extensively about the need to for architects to relinquish control and involve local communities in their design process.</em></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
      </content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="https://images.adsttc.com/media/images/56c5/dd70/e58e/ce27/af00/0009/newsletter/Wikihouse_4.0_-%C2%AE_Margaux_Carron-17.jpg?1455807852"></enclosure>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
