<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Chipperfield Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Have been inspired by... &#8211; I am WiBu</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-142277</link>
		<dc:creator>Have been inspired by... &#8211; I am WiBu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 15:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-142277</guid>
		<description>[...] been inspired by this interview with David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been inspired by this interview with David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Harvey</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-171127</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-171127</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;David Chipperfield interview, pretty good but how uncomfortable do these two look?  http://bit.ly/jhzcg&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">David Chipperfield interview, pretty good but how uncomfortable do these two look?  <a href="http://bit.ly/jhzcg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/jhzcg</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulina</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-33055</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-33055</guid>
		<description>He makes the most sense to me when he speaks out of all interviews/lectures I&#039;ve seen of different architects. So unpretentious, yet extremely witty. It&#039;s the architecture in moderation concept that I love about him and his works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He makes the most sense to me when he speaks out of all interviews/lectures I&#8217;ve seen of different architects. So unpretentious, yet extremely witty. It&#8217;s the architecture in moderation concept that I love about him and his works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Chipperfield Interview &#124; Arch Daily &#171; Dumblikeapainter&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-14604</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chipperfield Interview &#124; Arch Daily &#171; Dumblikeapainter&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-14604</guid>
		<description>[...] 31, 2009   David Chipperfield Interview &#124; Arch Daily.     Posted by dumblikeapainter Filed in David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 31, 2009   David Chipperfield Interview | Arch Daily.     Posted by dumblikeapainter Filed in David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-9778</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-9778</guid>
		<description>Really interesting. What I got out of that was he was saying that you not only need to have a process that makes sense but you need to make some sort of stance on why you are doing that project at all, what effects you want it to have and that will help give you a quality that you will try to attain through your formal solution.
It is an interesting way of thinking, and I think that the best architects out there, including some of the dreaded starchatects actually have this idea that is more important that form but it becomes hard to see to someone that doesn&#039;t study the building much since there really is such a large variety of formal styles and there are other constraints in the building process than just this one idea.
I do like his idea of more moderate architecture being the thermometer of architecture rather than the Guggenhiems and Dubais which might be more of an economic indicator. Not that they are totally removed from architecture either though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting. What I got out of that was he was saying that you not only need to have a process that makes sense but you need to make some sort of stance on why you are doing that project at all, what effects you want it to have and that will help give you a quality that you will try to attain through your formal solution.<br />
It is an interesting way of thinking, and I think that the best architects out there, including some of the dreaded starchatects actually have this idea that is more important that form but it becomes hard to see to someone that doesn&#8217;t study the building much since there really is such a large variety of formal styles and there are other constraints in the building process than just this one idea.<br />
I do like his idea of more moderate architecture being the thermometer of architecture rather than the Guggenhiems and Dubais which might be more of an economic indicator. Not that they are totally removed from architecture either though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josefina</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-9771</link>
		<dc:creator>josefina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-9771</guid>
		<description>i like when he sais that architecture cant be an image, it needs an idea, in 3d, solving the problem, not just  a good render.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like when he sais that architecture cant be an image, it needs an idea, in 3d, solving the problem, not just  a good render.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemporary Art</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-9729</link>
		<dc:creator>Contemporary Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-9729</guid>
		<description>Interesting video, although I think specific examples would be helpful. As an argument for living in a built world more focused on ideas, this is a bit vague to be totally convincing. The ideas here are worth discussing, but it&#039;s not clear from this on its own how they would translate into actual practice. 
--
http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting video, although I think specific examples would be helpful. As an argument for living in a built world more focused on ideas, this is a bit vague to be totally convincing. The ideas here are worth discussing, but it&#8217;s not clear from this on its own how they would translate into actual practice.<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karynn Ikeda</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-171128</link>
		<dc:creator>Karynn Ikeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-171128</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;architect David Chipperfield interview available at ArchDaily http://tinyurl.com/69l964&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">architect David Chipperfield interview available at ArchDaily <a href="http://tinyurl.com/69l964" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/69l964</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Santos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/9851/david-chipperfield-interview/#comment-9711</link>
		<dc:creator>David Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=9851#comment-9711</guid>
		<description>Great work, mt friend, great! Have a nice weekend!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work, mt friend, great! Have a nice weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 21:26:58 by W3 Total Cache -->
