Comments on: VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS

By: Artemiy Tselovalnik

Artemiy Tselovalnik — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:12:35 +0000

VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily http://t.co/aSZ6xRI via @archdaily
WOW!

By: Sean Cleary

Sean Cleary — Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:45:00 +0000

Another great project from BIG – the kings of diagrams! VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily http://t.co/l42lClZ via @archdaily

By: Carmelo Dalpe

Carmelo Dalpe — Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:59:41 +0000

Officials said iodine 131 levels in seawater 19 miles from the coastal nuclear complex were within acceptable limits established by regulations and the contamination posed little risk to aquatic life.

By: ericariva

ericariva — Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:35:50 +0000

2) VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS _ http://t.co/m8Rxa7r #Architecture #Photography

By: Erica Riva

Erica Riva — Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:16:20 +0000

VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS _ http://t.co/m8Rxa7r #architecture #photography

By: Suzuki Takeya

Suzuki Takeya — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:04:06 +0000

RT @kajino14: VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS http://bit.ly/fOARQt

By: tokue kajino

tokue kajino — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:26:30 +0000

VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS http://bit.ly/fOARQt

By: Vertex Modelling

Vertex Modelling — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:57:54 +0000

RT @michalkonicek: Unpleasing yet beautiful architecture – VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily http://t.co/MOIslAR via @archdaily

By: Vertex Modelling

Vertex Modelling — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:57:54 +0000

RT @michalkonicek: Unpleasing yet beautiful architecture – VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily http://t.co/MOIslAR via @archdaily

By: Michal Konicek

Michal Konicek — Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:55:41 +0000

Unpleasing yet beautiful architecture – VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily http://t.co/MOIslAR via @archdaily

By: Mohammad Ataullah

Mohammad Ataullah — Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:32:21 +0000

No they r all at different places on plans if u look carefully & on views!

By: trollbeads jewelry

trollbeads jewelry — Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:52:11 +0000

Looking around the web, I found your webblog. I was searching for some ideas for a theme for my own blog. I like your design, did you buy or modify this template? I have a webblog too and my layout seems to be kinda sorry as a result visitors don’t visit on my internet site very long.

By: adrian

adrian — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:38:43 +0000

cool.. it’s economical to compress the forms.. so cool the lot is maximized :)

By: Jegan.M.V.Murugan

Jegan.M.V.Murugan — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:48:15 +0000

VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily http://t.co/TKwj412 via @archdaily

By: Luiz Dumont

Luiz Dumont — Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:13:54 +0000

Reading: "VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/5xrywc )

By: Inqmnd Blog – VM Houses

Inqmnd Blog – VM Houses — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:00:38 +0000

[...] Designed by virtually the same team (BIG and JDS architects were the original founders of PLOT) and located next to each other, the VM Houses are the sister project to the Mountain Dwellings (posted yesterday.) Located in Copenhagen, Denmark, the two residential blocks were designed as a “v” and an “m” to provide maximum daylight and views, while also allowing for privacy. Starting their design process with two rectangles, the architects went through several permutations until they got to the current VM design. The overall shape of the buildings is filtered down into the balconies, as their jutting and irregular triangular shapes bring to mind the overall design. The slopping roof design also led to dozens of floor plans, which the architects felt reflected the diversity of the future families and individuals who would be living there. Most North American real estate developers traditionally have a small range of floor plans and most condos look generally the same. Thankfully, some designers and developers feel that new times demand new expressions. More images after the jump. Link [...]

By: Luiz Dumont

Luiz Dumont — Thu, 13 May 2010 14:27:26 +0000

Reading: "VM Houses / PLOT = BIG + JDS | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/5xrywc )

By: fab

fab — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:05:59 +0000

I still thinking that there is too much attention on the “visual effect” and not the architecture.
let say you are in plan 1, v35.2-s1 sitting on the sofa and in front you have the balcony of v32.2s, also looking at vm07.jpg (the more oblique view). Moreover for additional aesthetics the alternation of directions gives more visual from one of the upper balconies to the lower ones, aesthetics vs privacy, then the apparent subjective issue about aesthetics, that some “like” or “dislike” the appearance, the appearance is just appearance, nothing essential, and at the essence, the project does not accomplish what is promised (privacy, etc…) then it is not that good, even if the aesthetic effect might be “good” or “bad” which will depend on your own background of esthetic knowledge, but architecture does not depend on that, it is or not what it should.

By: flavin

flavin — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:56:35 +0000

Is so weird the effect

By: fercha

fercha — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:36:05 +0000

i think the basic idea breaking the appartments in puzzle like pieces to form unit, its awesome, but sadly the fachade its horrible. its agressive, gives an unpleasent feeling