We made it to the top 5 contenders! support and vote us for Best Online Magazine at the Open Web Awards! [close]
Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

Sky Village in Rødovre / MVRDV

By David Basulto — Filed under: Skyscrapers , , , ,
 

Some time ago we featured a mid rise building by OMA in New York, a cantilevered volume that brings a new concept for tall buildings. A similar approach can be found at a recent competition for the Rødovre Skyscraper won by MVRDV in association with ADEPT: A 116m tall mixed use tower, based on a 60sqm module arranged around the central core of the building.

It´s interesting to see the structural approach for this new typology, as you can see on another render below: the inner core -actually 3 cores to access the different program segments- is made out of concrete, with the units wrapping it around on a steel structure.

Something interesting in times like this, is that the building allows for different configurations responding to unstable markets, flexibility achieved by re-designating these 60sqm units.

The lower levels will offer space for retail and restaurants, with a surrounding public plaza. Over that, the building starts to widen for office space, and then starts to lean to the north to generate terraced gardens to the south, an orientation that benefits the residential apartments on that portion of the building. At the top, the hotel will have a great view of the city.

Last week I was talking with Robert Lange from BIG, and he was telling me that the danish goverment is very strict when it comes to energy standards in buildings, which is reflected on some green facts of this building: it includes a greywater circuit, the use of 40% recycled concrete in the foundation and a variety of energy producing devices on the façade.

The building looks good at street level, something very important for the city.

Also, keep an eye on ADEPT. They have won some interesting competitions, I´m sure we will hear from them in the future.

Seen at Contemporist and Inhabitat.

 

18 comments »

tim says:

I really appreciate MVRDV’s connection to the city in this and other projects, but… how are you going to grow a 12′ tree in a 1′ slab?

 
# November 11, 2008 at 00:25
jiri says:

May be they developed new kind of roots. You can´t know ;)

 
# November 11, 2008 at 03:59
Comtitant says:

I really appreciate the cute diagrams. They justify everything…

 
# November 11, 2008 at 08:34

Well, there are some small trees that grow their roots on horizontal, such as orange trees (i think).

 
# November 11, 2008 at 09:09
borja says:

i hope Comtitant is joking, i seriously think those diagrams don’t justify much, they could in some case, but so far the don’t
anyway, i like the straight composition, it’s humble and poetic at the same time, simple and suggestive.
but i wonder how do they deal with privacity issues. since it’s about dwellings vertically organized, it’s allways preferential to reach a high level of privacity, and i doubt about it in this kind of composition, cause these glass façades seem to face others in a close distance. i’ll check it myself with detailed plans anyway
=D

 
# November 11, 2008 at 11:13
Hamster says:

Wow. Many years ago I read an interview where MVRDV talked about their optimistic way of seeing our age. With this in mind I really understand the way they project.

 
# November 11, 2008 at 18:31

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 
# November 12, 2008 at 02:01
Natalie says:

The condition of Human living is more and more like bees.

 
# November 12, 2008 at 02:43
claude mallia says:

where is architecture heading??
pretty renders and montages??

 
# November 12, 2008 at 05:53
Gaston says:

…http://designistdream.com/wp-content/uploads/Habitat_67_M_Safdie.jpg

what about that…? I just saw wall-e eheh it looks pretty much like mvrdv building…scary

 
# January 12, 2009 at 16:13
HenryE says:

always the netherland´s talent !

 
# April 22, 2009 at 01:28
mimar says:

MVRDV did some great architecture in their beginnings, but i’m not sure about their attitute. what i see here is interesting as a conceptual idea, but the final project shown here is rather poor. just being able to arrage modular boxes around a core does in this case not make a great design with good proportions and also questionable in terms of living quality.

 
# April 22, 2009 at 08:47
h says:

At least put those trees in planters or something.

 
# April 24, 2009 at 09:04
kjxyakq says:
# October 18, 2009 at 15:18
Tosh says:

I think this building makes sense just in its creator’s mind.. the diagrams show nothing but the random approach they chose, I don’t think they justify anything – there is no contextual diagrams – this building is all about itself – it’s trying to get all the people in it and make the surroundings empty and soul-less..

 
# November 5, 2009 at 06:00

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

I loved the space !! i can say that the...[+]
Does anyone know the actual page of this architects, years...[+]
The colors, lighting and the white furniture ! all of these elements...[+]
The design of course cost a fortune and made the...[+]
exagerations exaggerations… Is okay, it will...[+]
Virginia tech and Carnegie Mellon are the...[+]
Yep…looks like BIG…and unfortunately it is not better....[+]
The spiral mass concept is similar to their...[+]
RE: Lubetkin Good point. It is actually...[+]
Very nice rendernings..[+]
yes, i am so sick and tired of those ‘copy copy copy’ comments....[+]
please stop it[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »