<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duoc Corporate Building / Sabbagh Arquitectos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:32:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-36152</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-36152</guid>
		<description>Going back to the chain of possible precedents, I agree with Thiago about the Petrobras building in Rio de Janeiro, which I think is an excellent building adapted to its climatic context. Simple yet strong concept, with lots of basic sustainable design ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going back to the chain of possible precedents, I agree with Thiago about the Petrobras building in Rio de Janeiro, which I think is an excellent building adapted to its climatic context. Simple yet strong concept, with lots of basic sustainable design ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fab</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-33547</link>
		<dc:creator>fab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 09:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-33547</guid>
		<description>??
is this about religion now?

anyway if this were the case, and they are selling their idea like something only god can do (pretentious writing about ideas that are supposed to be new), and it has not even been touched by an angel, so thats bad...

Why always so pretentious? why can they not just be honest and say: we done this kind of usual stuff but with this shape, to achieve this and that, over. 
Always coming up with something like &quot; an arabesque that conceptualizes and abstracts the idea of the branches and foliage of ...&quot;, writings will not make the building better nor more original than it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??<br />
is this about religion now?</p>
<p>anyway if this were the case, and they are selling their idea like something only god can do (pretentious writing about ideas that are supposed to be new), and it has not even been touched by an angel, so thats bad&#8230;</p>
<p>Why always so pretentious? why can they not just be honest and say: we done this kind of usual stuff but with this shape, to achieve this and that, over.<br />
Always coming up with something like &#8221; an arabesque that conceptualizes and abstracts the idea of the branches and foliage of &#8230;&#8221;, writings will not make the building better nor more original than it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ade</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-33513</link>
		<dc:creator>ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-33513</guid>
		<description>....We all know that there is nothing new here.

&quot;only GOD can create something new&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.We all know that there is nothing new here.</p>
<p>&#8220;only GOD can create something new&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fab</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-29560</link>
		<dc:creator>fab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 03:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-29560</guid>
		<description>thats it, its reminds a good building that could have been built more than 40 years ago.
Easy to recognize when they start using too much &quot;like a&quot; or &quot;like an&quot;, words used to explain something that is intendet to fit with, but not a strong concept that actually &quot;is&quot; instead of &quot;being like a&quot;. 
Its different if an architect owns a strong concept, then the building &quot;is&quot; and not &quot;is like a&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats it, its reminds a good building that could have been built more than 40 years ago.<br />
Easy to recognize when they start using too much &#8220;like a&#8221; or &#8220;like an&#8221;, words used to explain something that is intendet to fit with, but not a strong concept that actually &#8220;is&#8221; instead of &#8220;being like a&#8221;.<br />
Its different if an architect owns a strong concept, then the building &#8220;is&#8221; and not &#8220;is like a&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thiago</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-29434</link>
		<dc:creator>thiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-29434</guid>
		<description>the wholes reminds me the best building in Brazil in my opinion.. 
Edifício sede Petrobrás, Rio de Janeiro, by a group of young brasilian architects in the 60ties...
see the link above</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the wholes reminds me the best building in Brazil in my opinion..<br />
Edifício sede Petrobrás, Rio de Janeiro, by a group of young brasilian architects in the 60ties&#8230;<br />
see the link above</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fab</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-28995</link>
		<dc:creator>fab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-28995</guid>
		<description>夜绮神木子, its not a concept at all, its just  that some usually call as &quot;selling the idea filling the page with some prety words&quot;
We all know that there is nothing new here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>夜绮神木子, its not a concept at all, its just  that some usually call as &#8220;selling the idea filling the page with some prety words&#8221;<br />
We all know that there is nothing new here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-24291</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-24291</guid>
		<description>It is a good looking building. It onterior design layout I take as a concept(testfit) only so I will not comment on its space space planning flaws. It is worh mentioning that the idea is not that original, and it is based very literally on the &quot;One George Street&quot;/Singapore building by Skidmore, Owings &amp; Merrill, which is a very good example of an office building suitable to a tropical environment (1 degree North of the Equator).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good looking building. It onterior design layout I take as a concept(testfit) only so I will not comment on its space space planning flaws. It is worh mentioning that the idea is not that original, and it is based very literally on the &#8220;One George Street&#8221;/Singapore building by Skidmore, Owings &amp; Merrill, which is a very good example of an office building suitable to a tropical environment (1 degree North of the Equator).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 夜绮神木子</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-11732</link>
		<dc:creator>夜绮神木子</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-11732</guid>
		<description>&quot;This band is originated in a series of continuous bends, like an arabesque that conceptualizes and abstracts the idea of the branches and foliage of a tree.&quot; WHERE IT IS?IT IS NOT A STRONG CONCEPT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This band is originated in a series of continuous bends, like an arabesque that conceptualizes and abstracts the idea of the branches and foliage of a tree.&#8221; WHERE IT IS?IT IS NOT A STRONG CONCEPT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duoc Corporate Building / Sabbagh Arquitectos &#171; CharlieMartinez.wordpress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-9149</link>
		<dc:creator>Duoc Corporate Building / Sabbagh Arquitectos &#171; CharlieMartinez.wordpress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-9149</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Archdaily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Archdaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/8477/duoc-corporate-building-sabbagh-arquitectos/#comment-7607</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=8477#comment-7607</guid>
		<description>wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
