<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arritt Farmhouse / OnSite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosalind Derby</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-705135</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosalind Derby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 02:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-705135</guid>
		<description>I really like this: so good: in NZ rural this would totally work: tried the same concept in a period, rural job here, but a little too contemporary for the client,so it got lost in the process early on: this is really fun: explore it! go for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this: so good: in NZ rural this would totally work: tried the same concept in a period, rural job here, but a little too contemporary for the client,so it got lost in the process early on: this is really fun: explore it! go for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gastón Rojas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-704523</link>
		<dc:creator>Gastón Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-704523</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Recuerdo que vi este proyecto como idea años atras, verlo realizado es mucho mejor http://t.co/YfQqnYq vía @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Recuerdo que vi este proyecto como idea años atras, verlo realizado es mucho mejor <a href="http://t.co/YfQqnYq" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/YfQqnYq</a> vía @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akiyoshi Nakao</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-201899</link>
		<dc:creator>Akiyoshi Nakao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-201899</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Arritt Farmhouse / OnSite &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/w8BYA3w via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Arritt Farmhouse / OnSite | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/w8BYA3w" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/w8BYA3w</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozmoto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-187977</link>
		<dc:creator>ozmoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-187977</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t ask it not to lean.... the pleasure is yours not mine.... weak....I&#039;d have to have a good reason....I&#039;m curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t ask it not to lean&#8230;. the pleasure is yours not mine&#8230;. weak&#8230;.I&#8217;d have to have a good reason&#8230;.I&#8217;m curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozmoto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-187974</link>
		<dc:creator>ozmoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-187974</guid>
		<description>Oh... and the building glows at night like historic leaning buildings do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; and the building glows at night like historic leaning buildings do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-187260</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-187260</guid>
		<description>I admire the idea and the subtlety. At night the intention speaks most loudly.  The issue I am having is the execution.  The cheap windows and the unfinished interior detailing degrade the project rather than help amplify it. If the architects&#039; point was to help us pay more attention to the old building, greater refinement of the new construction could&#039;ve made this project a real success. As is, it&#039;s just not quite there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admire the idea and the subtlety. At night the intention speaks most loudly.  The issue I am having is the execution.  The cheap windows and the unfinished interior detailing degrade the project rather than help amplify it. If the architects&#8217; point was to help us pay more attention to the old building, greater refinement of the new construction could&#8217;ve made this project a real success. As is, it&#8217;s just not quite there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-186331</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-186331</guid>
		<description>This is really beautiful,What is it really for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really beautiful,What is it really for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185917</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185917</guid>
		<description>pomo is back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pomo is back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185589</link>
		<dc:creator>LD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185589</guid>
		<description>No way Megan: It only more clearly divides old and new, rather than &quot;gently&quot; or &quot;elegantly&quot; unites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way Megan: It only more clearly divides old and new, rather than &#8220;gently&#8221; or &#8220;elegantly&#8221; unites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185473</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185473</guid>
		<description>Agreed Megan. I would have taken it a step further and tried to completely dematerialize the connection and made it even lighter/transparent. The play of old and new reminds me of a couple projects I saw over in Europe, notable the Jewish Museum in Berlin (the way Libeskind leaves a gap between the Coliegenhaus and his glass courtyard, and the underground passage way to the new building) and Coop Himmelb(l)au&#039;s Gasometer City housing in Vienna.

I love the attention to materiality in the addition and the dialogue it has with the existing house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed Megan. I would have taken it a step further and tried to completely dematerialize the connection and made it even lighter/transparent. The play of old and new reminds me of a couple projects I saw over in Europe, notable the Jewish Museum in Berlin (the way Libeskind leaves a gap between the Coliegenhaus and his glass courtyard, and the underground passage way to the new building) and Coop Himmelb(l)au&#8217;s Gasometer City housing in Vienna.</p>
<p>I love the attention to materiality in the addition and the dialogue it has with the existing house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185460</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185460</guid>
		<description>No way LD: The clear separations between old and new are what gives this project its gentle elegance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way LD: The clear separations between old and new are what gives this project its gentle elegance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dezign_bot</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185403</link>
		<dc:creator>dezign_bot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185403</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Arritt Farmhouse / OnSite Architecture: © Courtesy of OnSite ArchitectureArchitects: OnSite Architecture Location:... http://bit.ly/abDnJr&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Arritt Farmhouse / OnSite Architecture: © Courtesy of OnSite ArchitectureArchitects: OnSite Architecture Location:&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/abDnJr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/abDnJr</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two-story Wooden Farmhouse by OnSite Architecture - Home Design and Architecture - Home Design and Architecture</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185370</link>
		<dc:creator>Two-story Wooden Farmhouse by OnSite Architecture - Home Design and Architecture - Home Design and Architecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185370</guid>
		<description>[...] Project: Arritt Farmhouse Architects: OnSite Architecture Location: Virginia, USA Project Managers: Marie and Keith Zawistowski Project Team: Sean King, Patrick Hummel, Erin Carraher Structural Engineering: Pierre LaFlamme Via: Archdaily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Project: Arritt Farmhouse Architects: OnSite Architecture Location: Virginia, USA Project Managers: Marie and Keith Zawistowski Project Team: Sean King, Patrick Hummel, Erin Carraher Structural Engineering: Pierre LaFlamme Via: Archdaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LD</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185302</link>
		<dc:creator>LD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185302</guid>
		<description>That narrow umbilical-cord-like hallway is a failed and desperate attempt to link the old and the new structures. Come on, you can think of a better solution than that.

The architects should have combined the two balconies on the second floor of the old building while they were there. &quot;Hey neighbour!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That narrow umbilical-cord-like hallway is a failed and desperate attempt to link the old and the new structures. Come on, you can think of a better solution than that.</p>
<p>The architects should have combined the two balconies on the second floor of the old building while they were there. &#8220;Hey neighbour!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OnSite</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185287</link>
		<dc:creator>OnSite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185287</guid>
		<description>John got it right: the addition is built on the footprint of an old slave kitchen, that was not built nearly as well as the rest of the house and was on its way to falling down. While we had to demolish this building (the timber was reused in the renovation), there was a lot of sentimental value attached to it on the owners part. The &quot;lean&quot; to the new addition, which is torqued 3.5 degrees, recalls the one of the old kitchen before it had to be taken down. The new addition being translucent, we call it the ghost of the old kitchen.

As far as the insulation question is concerned, the two layers of self insulated polycarbonate panels coupled with the trapped air in the wall cavity provide the building&#039;s insulation.

Thanks for your comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John got it right: the addition is built on the footprint of an old slave kitchen, that was not built nearly as well as the rest of the house and was on its way to falling down. While we had to demolish this building (the timber was reused in the renovation), there was a lot of sentimental value attached to it on the owners part. The &#8220;lean&#8221; to the new addition, which is torqued 3.5 degrees, recalls the one of the old kitchen before it had to be taken down. The new addition being translucent, we call it the ghost of the old kitchen.</p>
<p>As far as the insulation question is concerned, the two layers of self insulated polycarbonate panels coupled with the trapped air in the wall cavity provide the building&#8217;s insulation.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wpgmb</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185246</link>
		<dc:creator>wpgmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185246</guid>
		<description>so what?  it&#039;s a fun project.  almost like something you&#039;d find in Tokyo.  not bad for Virginia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what?  it&#8217;s a fun project.  almost like something you&#8217;d find in Tokyo.  not bad for Virginia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185235</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185235</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the building leans because it is using historic buildings as a precedent, structures which are often no longer square.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the building leans because it is using historic buildings as a precedent, structures which are often no longer square.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Patten</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185247</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Patten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185247</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Arritt Farmhouse. http://bit.ly/dtwPCu&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Arritt Farmhouse. <a href="http://bit.ly/dtwPCu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dtwPCu</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freq</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185221</link>
		<dc:creator>freq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185221</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why does the building lean?&quot; / &quot;what justifies this form?&quot;

Why not? / The pleasure of looking at it? Would that suffice? What reasons would you accept? And why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why does the building lean?&#8221; / &#8220;what justifies this form?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why not? / The pleasure of looking at it? Would that suffice? What reasons would you accept? And why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voisin de ville</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/70420/arritt-farmhouse-onsite-architecture/#comment-185169</link>
		<dc:creator>voisin de ville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=70420#comment-185169</guid>
		<description>polycarbonate is used this way in France, and normally propose a good insulation.
I wl=ould ask the same question as ozmoto:
what justifies this form ? structure stabilty ? symbole ? nothing just ?
If it&#039;s &quot;nothing easthetic pleasur&quot;, I would say this is just a demonstration of ability to draw and to organise a site ... youpi what a fun ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>polycarbonate is used this way in France, and normally propose a good insulation.<br />
I wl=ould ask the same question as ozmoto:<br />
what justifies this form ? structure stabilty ? symbole ? nothing just ?<br />
If it&#8217;s &#8220;nothing easthetic pleasur&#8221;, I would say this is just a demonstration of ability to draw and to organise a site &#8230; youpi what a fun &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 15:46:01 by W3 Total Cache -->
