<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORDOS 100 #2: Luca Selva Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arquitectura</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-682225</link>
		<dc:creator>Arquitectura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-682225</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @arq_drno ORDOS 100 #2: Luca Selva Architects &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/o17eAMy vía @archdaily #arquitectura #a... http://t.co/gLl9g0j&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @arq_drno ORDOS 100 #2: Luca Selva Architects | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/o17eAMy" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/o17eAMy</a> vía @archdaily #arquitectura #a&#8230; <a href="http://t.co/gLl9g0j" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/gLl9g0j</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franco Difilippo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-682226</link>
		<dc:creator>Franco Difilippo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-682226</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;ORDOS 100 #2: Luca Selva Architects &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/j2QxT6N vía @archdaily #arquitectura #architecture&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">ORDOS 100 #2: Luca Selva Architects | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/j2QxT6N" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/j2QxT6N</a> vía @archdaily #arquitectura #architecture</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A day A dear</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-252837</link>
		<dc:creator>A day A dear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-252837</guid>
		<description>I like i think its great as an art
for designing and interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like i think its great as an art<br />
for designing and interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackbuddha</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-91200</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbuddha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-91200</guid>
		<description>...and...
I just have no idea how the designer get that strange shape out from the landscape... by accident?
It seems that it&#039;s a kinda irreasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and&#8230;<br />
I just have no idea how the designer get that strange shape out from the landscape&#8230; by accident?<br />
It seems that it&#8217;s a kinda irreasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackbuddha</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-91197</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbuddha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-91197</guid>
		<description>I think the idea itself is excellent, at least it&#039;s a way for designing. However, I cannot find any relationshiop between this object and China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea itself is excellent, at least it&#8217;s a way for designing. However, I cannot find any relationshiop between this object and China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Durban</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-38190</link>
		<dc:creator>Durban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-38190</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;it’s a pointlessy complicated building. Of course it creates interesting spaces (which fascinates at first, and probably makes the building fun to walk through), but it really is over the top and doesn’t respond to any -given- chaos… it just creates confusion in a relatively simple place.&quot;&quot; 
wow hm! you contradict yourself twice in one comment, thats impressive.

I think making walls in all sorts of directions to create dynamic views, spaces and paths is perfectly justified. Id love to explore this place and would enjoy living there.

BUT, the way they derived the plan from a photo is laughable. Eisenman did the same thing for cite de culture in santiago. He copied the old town map and pasted it onto his building for circulation. Im not convinced by that but at least he didnt try to justify it with &#039;being contextual&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;it’s a pointlessy complicated building. Of course it creates interesting spaces (which fascinates at first, and probably makes the building fun to walk through), but it really is over the top and doesn’t respond to any -given- chaos… it just creates confusion in a relatively simple place.&#8221;"<br />
wow hm! you contradict yourself twice in one comment, thats impressive.</p>
<p>I think making walls in all sorts of directions to create dynamic views, spaces and paths is perfectly justified. Id love to explore this place and would enjoy living there.</p>
<p>BUT, the way they derived the plan from a photo is laughable. Eisenman did the same thing for cite de culture in santiago. He copied the old town map and pasted it onto his building for circulation. Im not convinced by that but at least he didnt try to justify it with &#8216;being contextual&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-37108</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-37108</guid>
		<description>Hi all,

Personally, the interesting part is not how the form looks like, but rather, how was the form derived by. 

Did it merely mapped out the contours of the terrain only? or was there more to it.

If it was really built, has consideration of each wall and where it visually looks towards been considered?

As there were no perspective of the space being shown, its hard to tell if the architect has touched on the above mentioned.

So there are alot of unanswered questions just on this posting alone, but they may already been touched on which I sincerely hoped each responsible architect would have done.

Lastly, if its really built, the height of each wall will determine the dynamism, though it may be &quot;slanted here and there&quot; it does not mean it is hard to live in the space as most presume just by looking at the overall layout. Rather, if you stand within the space, you may find that it could be quite interesting and infact, quite &quot;wide&quot; a space compared to the traditional cube rooms. So we need to really see the inside, being able to visualize standing in it will we then see the real beauty of it. 

Overall, I feel that its a good attempt and good effort. Something was created, just that more needs to be shown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>Personally, the interesting part is not how the form looks like, but rather, how was the form derived by. </p>
<p>Did it merely mapped out the contours of the terrain only? or was there more to it.</p>
<p>If it was really built, has consideration of each wall and where it visually looks towards been considered?</p>
<p>As there were no perspective of the space being shown, its hard to tell if the architect has touched on the above mentioned.</p>
<p>So there are alot of unanswered questions just on this posting alone, but they may already been touched on which I sincerely hoped each responsible architect would have done.</p>
<p>Lastly, if its really built, the height of each wall will determine the dynamism, though it may be &#8220;slanted here and there&#8221; it does not mean it is hard to live in the space as most presume just by looking at the overall layout. Rather, if you stand within the space, you may find that it could be quite interesting and infact, quite &#8220;wide&#8221; a space compared to the traditional cube rooms. So we need to really see the inside, being able to visualize standing in it will we then see the real beauty of it. </p>
<p>Overall, I feel that its a good attempt and good effort. Something was created, just that more needs to be shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSXK</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-33210</link>
		<dc:creator>HSXK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 10:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-33210</guid>
		<description>I like it. I understand the meaning and significance of learning Architecture from it. It&#039;s so interesting, the building, the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it. I understand the meaning and significance of learning Architecture from it. It&#8217;s so interesting, the building, the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oranjuic</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-13683</link>
		<dc:creator>oranjuic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-13683</guid>
		<description>looks more like a study model of a 2nd year architecture student, not that it isn&#039;t remotely interesting, but nothing to be wowed at. i dont even think the scale is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks more like a study model of a 2nd year architecture student, not that it isn&#8217;t remotely interesting, but nothing to be wowed at. i dont even think the scale is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chickmagnetstuff</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-11160</link>
		<dc:creator>chickmagnetstuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 07:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-11160</guid>
		<description>now who would want to have something as complicated as that as a house design it looks like a map i don&#039;t like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now who would want to have something as complicated as that as a house design it looks like a map i don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amico</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-11141</link>
		<dc:creator>Amico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-11141</guid>
		<description>Seams to me like Escher&#039;s drawings
http://www.ubm.br/ubm/imagens/cultura/ref19/escher01.jpg

or walking on the streets of Morocco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seams to me like Escher&#8217;s drawings<br />
<a href="http://www.ubm.br/ubm/imagens/cultura/ref19/escher01.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.ubm.br/ubm/imagens/cultura/ref19/escher01.jpg</a></p>
<p>or walking on the streets of Morocco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hm</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-11037</link>
		<dc:creator>hm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-11037</guid>
		<description>I agree with whoever said it&#039;s a pointlessy complicated building. Of course it creates interesting spaces (which fascinates at first, and probably makes the building fun to walk through), but it really is over the top and doesn&#039;t respond to any -given- chaos... it just creates confusion in a relatively simple place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with whoever said it&#8217;s a pointlessy complicated building. Of course it creates interesting spaces (which fascinates at first, and probably makes the building fun to walk through), but it really is over the top and doesn&#8217;t respond to any -given- chaos&#8230; it just creates confusion in a relatively simple place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chingy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10645</link>
		<dc:creator>chingy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10645</guid>
		<description>i think its great as an artwork...but if its to build...is it necessary to waste money like this...rather then a more simple solution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think its great as an artwork&#8230;but if its to build&#8230;is it necessary to waste money like this&#8230;rather then a more simple solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10615</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10615</guid>
		<description>Waoooo
I see this is a very interesting architecture discussion!
I read this looking for someone who has somethiong interesting (or not) about architecture, not about how good he/she was at school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waoooo<br />
I see this is a very interesting architecture discussion!<br />
I read this looking for someone who has somethiong interesting (or not) about architecture, not about how good he/she was at school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To "miss M"</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10592</link>
		<dc:creator>To "miss M"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10592</guid>
		<description>To Miss M the student

the girl who design the moon.......*loooooooooool* yes next time, design the moon......because she not gonna worry *lol*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Miss M the student</p>
<p>the girl who design the moon&#8230;&#8230;.*loooooooooool* yes next time, design the moon&#8230;&#8230;because she not gonna worry *lol*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10581</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10581</guid>
		<description>to mr specific.... the architect.
hehehehehehehee..........hehehehehe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to mr specific&#8230;. the architect.<br />
hehehehehehehee&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.hehehehehe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: specific</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10555</link>
		<dc:creator>specific</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10555</guid>
		<description>What a great project! The most people in this blogg are probably students or not really have a idea from architecture. Herzog de Meuron does &quot;specific architecture&quot; / OMA does &quot;generic architecture&quot;. That project is &quot;specific architecture&quot; .- a great idea!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great project! The most people in this blogg are probably students or not really have a idea from architecture. Herzog de Meuron does &#8220;specific architecture&#8221; / OMA does &#8220;generic architecture&#8221;. That project is &#8220;specific architecture&#8221; .- a great idea!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10510</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10510</guid>
		<description>xing 1: mark 1:cocteau 0 : Marky mark 0

the question at the beginnig has nothign to do with project itself.......

next time i am doing a project i am not gonna worry annymore about the form or function, i will just google map the city or the country, or maybe i will try with the moon, i think i may find more interesting landscapes there ...hehehehe.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xing 1: mark 1:cocteau 0 : Marky mark 0</p>
<p>the question at the beginnig has nothign to do with project itself&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>next time i am doing a project i am not gonna worry annymore about the form or function, i will just google map the city or the country, or maybe i will try with the moon, i think i may find more interesting landscapes there &#8230;hehehehe&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10500</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10500</guid>
		<description>ha. good to see some people having fun in the comments.  I&#039;d have to agree with Mark though, the project is an irrelevant exercise in formalism - no matter what the design brief preaches.  Very self-absorbed, but I&#039;m assuming a lot of the projects that come out this development will be taking that approach...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha. good to see some people having fun in the comments.  I&#8217;d have to agree with Mark though, the project is an irrelevant exercise in formalism &#8211; no matter what the design brief preaches.  Very self-absorbed, but I&#8217;m assuming a lot of the projects that come out this development will be taking that approach&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xing</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/7014/ordos-100-2-luca-selva-architects/#comment-10492</link>
		<dc:creator>xing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=7014#comment-10492</guid>
		<description>this result has nothing to do with China.

To start from &quot;what to build in China&quot; is totally problematic. The fact is Chinese cities are in a huge divergent gruop with many difference to each other. 

Maybe the design should start with the environment of Ordos, Mongolia. This sandy desert environment calls for vernacular architecture and tons of consideration on its unique climate and geological stuff.

let us keep moving to the next and next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this result has nothing to do with China.</p>
<p>To start from &#8220;what to build in China&#8221; is totally problematic. The fact is Chinese cities are in a huge divergent gruop with many difference to each other. </p>
<p>Maybe the design should start with the environment of Ordos, Mongolia. This sandy desert environment calls for vernacular architecture and tons of consideration on its unique climate and geological stuff.</p>
<p>let us keep moving to the next and next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 07:54:12 by W3 Total Cache -->
