<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lace Apartments / OFIS arhitekti</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-47144</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 14:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-47144</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not sure about the emphasized verticality in the striped colors. I&#039;m imagining myself liking it more with a monochromatic scheme, or maybe a gradient that doesn&#039;t make me think of halloween. But i still love the architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not sure about the emphasized verticality in the striped colors. I&#8217;m imagining myself liking it more with a monochromatic scheme, or maybe a gradient that doesn&#8217;t make me think of halloween. But i still love the architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupesh Jamkhindikar</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-39006</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupesh Jamkhindikar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-39006</guid>
		<description>This indeed is an original piece of work. The embracing lace concept seems to have gone well through the design development process to produce something which is not mere repetition but unique for its style.
Much hard work in this. Bravo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This indeed is an original piece of work. The embracing lace concept seems to have gone well through the design development process to produce something which is not mere repetition but unique for its style.<br />
Much hard work in this. Bravo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-30686</link>
		<dc:creator>i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-30686</guid>
		<description>i think architects were brave to go this way.. i think they can see all mistakes they made now..in my opinion the funcional scheme is ok, but facades..are.. irritating..pure neighbours..Colors are nice, but sometimes less is realy better than more.. The volume could be more dynamic, but this building will become a real dominant of a quarter for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think architects were brave to go this way.. i think they can see all mistakes they made now..in my opinion the funcional scheme is ok, but facades..are.. irritating..pure neighbours..Colors are nice, but sometimes less is realy better than more.. The volume could be more dynamic, but this building will become a real dominant of a quarter for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafa</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-25688</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-25688</guid>
		<description>Well, it looks like no one is ever going to satisfy everyone with whatever design they produce. The arch-snobs on this and other blogs always comment negatively  about projects like this while praising the same Superficiality, poor colors, poor lighting, poor space planning AND poor environmental quality produced by starchitects. All they [starchitects] do is &quot;Design&quot; and make cool forms but the building never ends up functioning properly or they leak or what ever bad consequence results from the design they produce. The comments are often made out of context as well and never merit the project based on it&#039;s setting or the issue they has to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks like no one is ever going to satisfy everyone with whatever design they produce. The arch-snobs on this and other blogs always comment negatively  about projects like this while praising the same Superficiality, poor colors, poor lighting, poor space planning AND poor environmental quality produced by starchitects. All they [starchitects] do is &#8220;Design&#8221; and make cool forms but the building never ends up functioning properly or they leak or what ever bad consequence results from the design they produce. The comments are often made out of context as well and never merit the project based on it&#8217;s setting or the issue they has to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: u</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-22460</link>
		<dc:creator>u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-22460</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tesa</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-17360</link>
		<dc:creator>tesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-17360</guid>
		<description>Agree with Richard Skinner. Design is very original and unique.
I checked the opus of OFIS and I am really impressed and motivated in my work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Richard Skinner. Design is very original and unique.<br />
I checked the opus of OFIS and I am really impressed and motivated in my work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean grey</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-17359</link>
		<dc:creator>jean grey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-17359</guid>
		<description>eclectic

in a bad way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eclectic</p>
<p>in a bad way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-13996</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-13996</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but all who say this is horrible are blind loosers with no style. This is beautiful piece of architecture, innovative and elegant. Ofis Arhitekti are really tallented designers, they have their own, unique style which is different but great and thats the point!!! Better go praise those postmodern rat-traps and try to study world architecture a bit, JDR, Faux Chinchilla and so on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but all who say this is horrible are blind loosers with no style. This is beautiful piece of architecture, innovative and elegant. Ofis Arhitekti are really tallented designers, they have their own, unique style which is different but great and thats the point!!! Better go praise those postmodern rat-traps and try to study world architecture a bit, JDR, Faux Chinchilla and so on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mika</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-11174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-11174</guid>
		<description>funny..eating waffle ends up in wc. This is a good example of where architecture is heading this century. Throw in a bit of pattern &amp; color...that&#039;ll do. At least it&#039;ll brighten up the east blok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny..eating waffle ends up in wc. This is a good example of where architecture is heading this century. Throw in a bit of pattern &amp; color&#8230;that&#8217;ll do. At least it&#8217;ll brighten up the east blok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6547/lace-apartments-ofis-arhitekti/#comment-10465</link>
		<dc:creator>ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6547#comment-10465</guid>
		<description>good concept and attractive building result.
I agree with &quot;vision&quot;. Some comments are made or from frustrating architects who are sitting and do nothing or from pompous students like &quot;Rafa&quot; said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good concept and attractive building result.<br />
I agree with &#8220;vision&#8221;. Some comments are made or from frustrating architects who are sitting and do nothing or from pompous students like &#8220;Rafa&#8221; said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
