<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMA unveils new images for their New York residential tower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:18:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Thyssenkrupp Competition Non-Winners &#171; replace the ordinary</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-31275</link>
		<dc:creator>Thyssenkrupp Competition Non-Winners &#171; replace the ordinary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-31275</guid>
		<description>[...] Slick visuals, and an interesting idea, although succumbs to looking like a prominent high rise building. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Slick visuals, and an interesting idea, although succumbs to looking like a prominent high rise building. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Daily Sky Village in Rødovre &#171; Enhuong&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-7848</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Daily Sky Village in Rødovre &#171; Enhuong&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-7848</guid>
		<description>[...] time ago we featured a mid rise building by OMA in New York, a cantilevered volume that brings a new concept for tall buildings. A similar approach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time ago we featured a mid rise building by OMA in New York, a cantilevered volume that brings a new concept for tall buildings. A similar approach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky Village in Rødovre / MVRDV</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-7794</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky Village in Rødovre / MVRDV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-7794</guid>
		<description>[...] time ago we featured a mid rise building by OMA in New York, a cantilevered volume that brings a new concept for tall buildings. A similar approach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time ago we featured a mid rise building by OMA in New York, a cantilevered volume that brings a new concept for tall buildings. A similar approach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarpasez</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-6850</link>
		<dc:creator>scarpasez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-6850</guid>
		<description>Rem may be a cynical a**hole with a suitcase full of ugly diagrams, nasty discourse, and awful buildings on the grandest scale...but sometimes his firm hits the ball so far out of the park all his other baggage becomes trivial.  This building is exquisite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rem may be a cynical a**hole with a suitcase full of ugly diagrams, nasty discourse, and awful buildings on the grandest scale&#8230;but sometimes his firm hits the ball so far out of the park all his other baggage becomes trivial.  This building is exquisite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asfaltkonijn &#187; Koolhaas in NY</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-6315</link>
		<dc:creator>Asfaltkonijn &#187; Koolhaas in NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-6315</guid>
		<description>[...] verbaast de wereld opnieuw met een grappig en tegelijk technisch uitdagend gebouw in New York: One Madison Park. In plaats van de hogere verdiepingen te laten inspringen (oorspronkelijk verplicht door de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] verbaast de wereld opnieuw met een grappig en tegelijk technisch uitdagend gebouw in New York: One Madison Park. In plaats van de hogere verdiepingen te laten inspringen (oorspronkelijk verplicht door de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Basulto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-5977</link>
		<dc:creator>David Basulto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-5977</guid>
		<description>Mr James, 

Don&#039;t worry. I hope you are enjoying our latest picks, interesting buildings from young fresh practices from around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr James, </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry. I hope you are enjoying our latest picks, interesting buildings from young fresh practices from around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr James</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-5973</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-5973</guid>
		<description>LLL:
I think there is nothing against star-architects... the point is if this blog should publish them! 

Maybe the value of this blog resides in the strenght to ignore the eye candy architecture in benefit of the other 99% architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LLL:<br />
I think there is nothing against star-architects&#8230; the point is if this blog should publish them! </p>
<p>Maybe the value of this blog resides in the strenght to ignore the eye candy architecture in benefit of the other 99% architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Basulto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-5970</link>
		<dc:creator>David Basulto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-5970</guid>
		<description>LLL, I totally agree with you. This is something we haven&#039;t seen before. OMA is really pushing architecture forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LLL, I totally agree with you. This is something we haven&#8217;t seen before. OMA is really pushing architecture forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLL</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-5960</link>
		<dc:creator>LLL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-5960</guid>
		<description>To MZ and Lite:
What&#039;s the matter with you guys? This is an amazing work and deserves recognition. Why do you keep hating starchitects like hell? I mean, they do most of the pushing of architecture forward, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To MZ and Lite:<br />
What&#8217;s the matter with you guys? This is an amazing work and deserves recognition. Why do you keep hating starchitects like hell? I mean, they do most of the pushing of architecture forward, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OMA in New York &#171; The Cornak&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6403/oma-unveils-new-images-for-their-new-york-residential-tower/#comment-4624</link>
		<dc:creator>OMA in New York &#171; The Cornak&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6403#comment-4624</guid>
		<description>[...] More pics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More pics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
