<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORDOS 100 #3: nArchitects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: building round up 01 &#171; ARCHITECTURE00</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-13632</link>
		<dc:creator>building round up 01 &#171; ARCHITECTURE00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-13632</guid>
		<description>[...] PLOT 89 of the ORDOS PROJECT - expands and contracts with shifting use and temperatures:  http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PLOT 89 of the ORDOS PROJECT &#8211; expands and contracts with shifting use and temperatures:  http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Basulto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-12186</link>
		<dc:creator>David Basulto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-12186</guid>
		<description>Amelie,

You read our mind. We are featuring those projects during this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amelie,</p>
<p>You read our mind. We are featuring those projects during this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelie</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-12170</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-12170</guid>
		<description>About Ordos, it s a very strange situation…AND i think Narchitects were more courageous in the past / on the 100 ordos projects - the one of Mos-USA seems the best (www.mos-office.net) but again the RSie PUT a finger touch in the chinese target (www.new-territories.com/ordos%20100rsie.htm)
Have a look, amelie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Ordos, it s a very strange situation…AND i think Narchitects were more courageous in the past / on the 100 ordos projects &#8211; the one of Mos-USA seems the best (www.mos-office.net) but again the RSie PUT a finger touch in the chinese target (www.new-territories.com/ordos%20100rsie.htm)<br />
Have a look, amelie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rvltn</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-12155</link>
		<dc:creator>rvltn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-12155</guid>
		<description>i think this home is far from sterile.  the inner/outer house is a sincere projection of the human body outward the a hostile environment inner mongolia.  

the outer house is severe, but it is not alien - materially it of the earth and the bricks give it human scale.  

the inner house is very warm and the tubular spaces are smart and very inhabitable.   

treating the interstitial space between this inner and outer house as a kind of inside-outside seems like a good strategy for responding to the harsh climate.

Some critcisms i would have would be 

1) that the response to a harsh climate is fictitious given the reality of the future site of this home, which is in a lush suburban neighborhood filled with 100 monstrous and expensive villas, luxury cars, and families.  The renderings look great in the context of the existing Mongolian wilderness but after this project is complete it may well turn out to be just another artifact in architectural Disneyland.  (no doubt the fate of most of these homes)

2) the scale of the home is rather immense and daunting.  This may be due to the project restrictions set by the Ordos officials, but either way scale and sensitivity to the human body I think are paramount issues in the design of a home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this home is far from sterile.  the inner/outer house is a sincere projection of the human body outward the a hostile environment inner mongolia.  </p>
<p>the outer house is severe, but it is not alien &#8211; materially it of the earth and the bricks give it human scale.  </p>
<p>the inner house is very warm and the tubular spaces are smart and very inhabitable.   </p>
<p>treating the interstitial space between this inner and outer house as a kind of inside-outside seems like a good strategy for responding to the harsh climate.</p>
<p>Some critcisms i would have would be </p>
<p>1) that the response to a harsh climate is fictitious given the reality of the future site of this home, which is in a lush suburban neighborhood filled with 100 monstrous and expensive villas, luxury cars, and families.  The renderings look great in the context of the existing Mongolian wilderness but after this project is complete it may well turn out to be just another artifact in architectural Disneyland.  (no doubt the fate of most of these homes)</p>
<p>2) the scale of the home is rather immense and daunting.  This may be due to the project restrictions set by the Ordos officials, but either way scale and sensitivity to the human body I think are paramount issues in the design of a home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trimtab21</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-11853</link>
		<dc:creator>trimtab21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-11853</guid>
		<description>so much wasted volume space. Just another big sterile box</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so much wasted volume space. Just another big sterile box</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samurai</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-11848</link>
		<dc:creator>Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-11848</guid>
		<description>Quite frankly, I think this home looks hideous. Would any of you live here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite frankly, I think this home looks hideous. Would any of you live here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franco</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-11771</link>
		<dc:creator>Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-11771</guid>
		<description>I think this one is the best of the first three projects, but it would be better understood if there were plants, sections and façades!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this one is the best of the first three projects, but it would be better understood if there were plants, sections and façades!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sisifo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-11225</link>
		<dc:creator>sisifo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-11225</guid>
		<description>im dissapointed. i think narchitecs as an young office has more to give, specially in this kind of project, where the experimentation has some space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im dissapointed. i think narchitecs as an young office has more to give, specially in this kind of project, where the experimentation has some space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinking Cities</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-11214</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinking Cities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-11214</guid>
		<description>This development of homes in Inner Mongolia is interesting.  It will be a unique sight when all are constructed and inhabited, especially in the bleak context all of the renderings show. Good work nArchitects!
-
http://sinkingcities.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This development of homes in Inner Mongolia is interesting.  It will be a unique sight when all are constructed and inhabited, especially in the bleak context all of the renderings show. Good work nArchitects!<br />
-<br />
<a href="http://sinkingcities.com" rel="nofollow">http://sinkingcities.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-11207</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-11207</guid>
		<description>agree, completely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree, completely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contemporary Art</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/6294/ordos-100-3-narchitects/#comment-11202</link>
		<dc:creator>Contemporary Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=6294#comment-11202</guid>
		<description>Easily my favorite so far. It&#039;s clean, light, and not so laboriously experimental. Looks great. Thanks for keeping us up to date with this!
--
http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easily my favorite so far. It&#8217;s clean, light, and not so laboriously experimental. Looks great. Thanks for keeping us up to date with this!<br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 10:33:51 by W3 Total Cache -->
