King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art / Zaha Hadid Architects
The new King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art in Jordan designed by Zaha Hadid Architects has been announced this week.
The project comes after a competition awarded in June 2008, which included Snøhetta (Norway), Atelier Christian de Portzamparc (France), Delugan Meissl (Austria), Henning Larsens Tegnestue (Denmark) and Kerry Hill Architects (Singapore).
The project consists in a performing arts and cultural centre that includes a 1600-seat concert theatre, 400-seat theatre, educational centre, rehearsal rooms, and galleries.
As you can see on the renderings, the building is mainly a carved volume, with voids crossing it creating several visual relations.
On the outside, the volume looks very simple, contrasting with the carved spaces that express themselves on the facade.
More info about the project after the break:
The architectural expression for the new performing arts centre has been inspired by the uniquely beautiful monument of Petra. As an artificial oasis and sanctuary the ancient city of Petra is an appropriate source of analogy for a performing arts centre that aspires to be an oasis and sanctuary for contemporary culture.
Petra is also a fantastic example of the wonderful interplay between architecture and nature. Contemporary architecture is striving to emulate nature and imbue architecture with the intricate complexity and elegance of natural forms. In Petra we admire the way the rose-colored mountain walls have been fissured, eroded, carved and polished to reveal the strata of sedimentation along the fluid lines of the fluvial erosions.
We are applying the principle of fluid erosion and carving to the mass of the building for the performing arts centre. This principle of erosion is the sole means of articulating the public spaces in the building. Thus there is a very strong, legible relation between the exterior and interior public spaces. The interior public foyer space is a continuous, multi-level space that cuts through the building and connects the north and south side of the valley. The fact that the erosion is cutting through the building implies that the beautiful interior surfaces will be light-flooded and thus very visible from without. The eroded interior surface extends deep into the public plaza as a welcoming gesture drawing the public into the building. There can be no doubt that this inviting design will wash away the threshold anxiety that sometimes is felt in front of monumental cultural buildings.
While the erosion creates the public foyer spaces the remaining mass represents the performance spaces. The shape of the eroded space reveals the two main performance spaces as the figurative parts of the eroded mass. The big Concert Theater is exposed at the end of the public void. The Small Theater is exposed overhead at the front of the building where the public foyer space fuses with the public plaza. These two recognizably shaped volumes that contain the primary event spaces are then encapsulated by the support functions to create the exterior cubic volume. However, this exterior volume is not a rigid box. The volume is given tension be letting it gently swell – like the entasis of a column – in response to the public void in the centre of the building. Another nuance is to be noticed with respect to the treatment of the ground-surface – both on the plaza and within the public foyer. The plaza ground outside receives the underpass coming from the GAM strip and thus creates an amphi-theatre-like valley. The surface of the plaza rises gently as it approaches the building. The foyer ground is thus slightly raised and dips again slightly in response to the Small Theatre. The ground is eroded again in front of the big Concert Theater to reveal and give access to this performance space creating another situation that might become a kind of amphi-theatre within the overall space.
Such quasi-topographic manipulations of the ground surface are very communicative. They help to structure the large public surface and facilitate orientation and overview, in particular if the space is filled with people. Thus this play with the ground plane goes hand in hand with the overall ambitions of the multi-level public void that allows the audience to participate in the unified public space on many levels. In particular the second, elevated foyer level that connects across to the south-side of the valley might become Aman’s favorite spot to relax and enjoy the city.
Program: Concert theatre: 1600 seat, Small theatre: 400 seat, Educational Centre and Galleries
Cliente: The Greater Amman Municipality
Architect: Zaha Hadid Architects
Design: Zaha Hadid and Patrik Schumacher
Project Director: Charles Walker
Project Architect: Tariq Khayyat
Competition Team: Maria Araya, Melike Altinisik, Dominiki Dadatsi, Renata Dantas,Sylvia Georgiadou,Britta Knobel, Rashiq Muhamadali, Bence Pap, Eleni Pavlidou, Daniel Santos, Daniel Widrig, Sevil Yazici.
Structural Consultants: Dar Al-Handasah, Beirut-Cairo
Mechanical& Environmental Consultants: Dar Al-Handasah, Beirut-Cairo
Theatre & Acoustics consultant : Artec Consultants Inc, New York
Façade Engineers : Ramboll, London
Lighting Consultants: OVI, New York
















































nice choice of colors. the lobby looks like it would be a pretty breathtaking experience
….niemeyer…..like all the others….
It looks like a musical note; a very advanced architectural concept in contrast with the existing architecture!
Hope, it will be appreciated at its real value!
sections, plans ?
Yes, please. A Hadid project without plans and sections is just eye candy.
as usually,Zaha
it’s great!
take a look the animation
http://architecturalvideos.blogspot.com/2010/02/king-abdullah-ii-house-of-culture-art.html
just perfect!
The other winner project,Delugan Meissl’s design, is 10 times better than this. I have no idea why the judge decided to choose two winners for this:
Can u please give us a link so we could see the Delugan Meissl’es design ?
all winning entries below. i think D-M’s entry would have been classier in real life, especially if you can go on the roof.
http://architecturelab.net/2008/06/26/zaha-hadid-delugan-meissl-assossiated-architects-win-%E2%80%98darat-king-abdullah-ii%E2%80%99-competition-in-amman/
great work
@ ethem
international competitions results are infortunately often influenced by a kind of fashion effect. zaha hadid is fashion!
i usually do not like the works of her company, but this one gets some good points!
Meh. One trick pony.
Zaha Hadid better check herzog de meuron hamburg! there she will see a nice operaroom!!!
Blob on blob
archi got it: one trick pony. kind of looks like the inside of a cow´s bowel…
where can i get to see the other entries…would love to go through delugan meissls entry..
It is new trend of course… Blow in geometry shape. But… Actualy, I don’t understand why it is allways Z.H.???… A lot of other architects has same ideas, however she is on top… I don’t like this situation…
Develop your own style!!! Then, maybe you can get featured too, and who knows it may be that another wining person comes and thinks you are Americas Next Top Architect…
Yet another sculpture masquerading as architecture.
Great? Well I didn’t see any plans, sections or even diagrams, so for all I know Dan is right on: sculpture instead of architecture. There’s no problem with being grandiose as long as there’s a concept, a purpose or a problem to solve. But here there’s none of that; it’s form for form’s sake [there's even no hint of material]. I can’t see how there’s any architectural progress with this project. It seems to be another self-indulgent solipsit exersice of ego, to jerk-off someone else’s [Mr. Abdullah #2]. Of course I’d love to hear anyone defend its merits…
well she won the competition, so any critique of her proposal is kind of nullified. unless you’re paying for the building….
…Well, I guess that arguments trumps any kind of criticism, for this project and any other, and by extension this whole section on ArchDaily wouldn’t exist. End of story, right?
Because popular opinion/the opinion of X amount of judges is unquestionable?
Any plans? Sections?
So far – it’s just a form. Very Hadid, obviously, but sort of inverted inside out. Instead of free standing blurb, it’s a blurb within a box.
Agree with Dan – “sculpture masquerading as architecture”.
not usually a fan of Zaha Hadid's design sensibility but this is awesome: http://bit.ly/b1syvg
The project is very organic(orgazmic)and very futuristic. Bravo Zaha. Plans and cross sections,please!
Acoustics? hard surfaces everywhere? They need an acoustician badly!
hmm much better than other Zahas
Hi….thanks for this good information.I’m so happy because it’s very useful for my thesis research.I hope you will keep updating your content constantly as you have one dedicated reader here :)
11:54 AM Jul 12th
Gorgeous architecture. Great scale and fluidity. Would love to see this. King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art http://bit.ly/aY7ahk
10:02 AM Apr 23rd
IMPRESSIVE! King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art / Zaha Hadid Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/5h9dMJG via @archdaily #Jo #Amman
10:40 AM Apr 23rd
RT @EvelynZoubi: IMPRESSIVE! King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art / Zaha Hadid Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/5h9dMJG via @archda …
6:46 PM Nov 2nd
Dit gebouw bijvoorbeeld, wat ze daar kan met beton en glas, zo ongelofelijk mooi:
http://t.co/RFUdMxfs