King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art / Zaha Hadid Architects

By — Filed under: Awarded Competitions ,Cultural , , ,
 

The new King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art in designed by Zaha Hadid Architects has been announced this week.

The project comes after a competition awarded in June 2008, which included Snøhetta (Norway), Atelier Christian de Portzamparc (France), Delugan Meissl (Austria), Henning Larsens Tegnestue (Denmark) and Kerry Hill Architects (Singapore).

The project consists in a performing arts and cultural centre that includes a 1600-seat concert theatre, 400-seat theatre, educational centre, rehearsal rooms, and galleries.

As you can see on the renderings, the building is mainly a carved volume, with voids crossing it creating several visual relations.

On the outside, the volume looks very simple, contrasting with the carved spaces that express themselves on the facade.

More info about the project after the break:

© Zaha Hadid Architects

The architectural expression for the new performing arts centre has been inspired by the uniquely beautiful monument of Petra. As an artificial oasis and sanctuary the ancient city of Petra is an appropriate source of analogy for a performing arts centre that aspires to be an oasis and sanctuary for contemporary culture.
Petra is also a fantastic example of the wonderful interplay between architecture and nature. Contemporary architecture is striving to emulate nature and imbue architecture with the intricate complexity and elegance of natural forms. In Petra we admire the way the rose-colored mountain walls have been fissured, eroded, carved and polished to reveal the strata of sedimentation along the fluid lines of the fluvial erosions.

We are applying the principle of fluid erosion and carving to the mass of the building for the performing arts centre. This principle of erosion is the sole means of articulating the public spaces in the building. Thus there is a very strong, legible relation between the exterior and interior public spaces. The interior public foyer space is a continuous, multi-level space that cuts through the building and connects the north and south side of the valley. The fact that the erosion is cutting through the building implies that the beautiful interior surfaces will be light-flooded and thus very visible from without. The eroded interior surface extends deep into the public plaza as a welcoming gesture drawing the public into the building. There can be no doubt that this inviting design will wash away the threshold anxiety that sometimes is felt in front of monumental cultural buildings.

© Zaha Hadid Architects

While the erosion creates the public foyer spaces the remaining mass represents the performance spaces. The shape of the eroded space reveals the two main performance spaces as the figurative parts of the eroded mass. The big Concert Theater is exposed at the end of the public void. The Small Theater is exposed overhead at the front of the building where the public foyer space fuses with the public plaza. These two recognizably shaped volumes that contain the primary event spaces are then encapsulated by the support functions to create the exterior cubic volume. However, this exterior volume is not a rigid box. The volume is given tension be letting it gently swell – like the entasis of a column – in response to the public void in the centre of the building. Another nuance is to be noticed with respect to the treatment of the ground-surface – both on the plaza and within the public foyer. The plaza ground outside receives the underpass coming from the GAM strip and thus creates an amphi-theatre-like valley. The surface of the plaza rises gently as it approaches the building. The foyer ground is thus slightly raised and dips again slightly in response to the Small Theatre. The ground is eroded again in front of the big Concert Theater to reveal and give access to this performance space creating another situation that might become a kind of amphi-theatre within the overall space.

© Zaha Hadid Architects

Such quasi-topographic manipulations of the ground surface are very communicative. They help to structure the large public surface and facilitate orientation and overview, in particular if the space is filled with people. Thus this play with the ground plane goes hand in hand with the overall ambitions of the multi-level public void that allows the audience to participate in the unified public space on many levels. In particular the second, elevated foyer level that connects across to the south-side of the valley might become Aman’s favorite spot to relax and enjoy the city.

Program: Concert theatre: 1600 seat, Small theatre: 400 seat, Educational Centre and Galleries
Cliente: The Greater Amman Municipality
Architect: Zaha Hadid Architects
Design: Zaha Hadid and Patrik Schumacher
Project Director: Charles Walker
Project Architect: Tariq Khayyat
Competition Team: Maria Araya, Melike Altinisik, Dominiki Dadatsi, Renata Dantas,Sylvia Georgiadou,Britta Knobel, Rashiq Muhamadali, Bence Pap, Eleni Pavlidou, Daniel Santos, Daniel Widrig, Sevil Yazici.
Structural Consultants: Dar Al-Handasah, Beirut-Cairo
Mechanical& Environmental Consultants: Dar Al-Handasah, Beirut-Cairo
Theatre & Acoustics consultant : Artec Consultants Inc, New York
Façade Engineers : Ramboll, London
Lighting Consultants: OVI, New York

 
 
Thumb up Thumb down 0
z99 says:

nice choice of colors. the lobby looks like it would be a pretty breathtaking experience

 
# February 24, 2010 at 21:20
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Bola de fogo says:

    ….niemeyer…..like all the others….

     
    # February 26, 2010 at 09:30
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ferarc says:

It looks like a musical note; a very advanced architectural concept in contrast with the existing architecture!
Hope, it will be appreciated at its real value!

 
# February 25, 2010 at 01:34
Thumb up Thumb down 0
H_R says:

sections, plans ?

 
# February 25, 2010 at 02:03
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    Joshua says:

    Yes, please. A Hadid project without plans and sections is just eye candy.

     
    # February 25, 2010 at 12:04
Thumb up Thumb down 0
snight____night says:

as usually,Zaha
it’s great!

take a look the animation

http://architecturalvideos.blogspot.com/2010/02/king-abdullah-ii-house-of-culture-art.html

 
# February 25, 2010 at 03:22
Thumb up Thumb down 0
john_eclipse says:

just perfect!

 
# February 25, 2010 at 03:51
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ethem says:

The other winner project,Delugan Meissl’s design, is 10 times better than this. I have no idea why the judge decided to choose two winners for this:

 
# February 25, 2010 at 04:37
Thumb up Thumb down 0
kiratu says:

great work

 
# February 25, 2010 at 05:24
Thumb up Thumb down 0
dioz says:

@ ethem
international competitions results are infortunately often influenced by a kind of fashion effect. zaha hadid is fashion!
i usually do not like the works of her company, but this one gets some good points!

 
# February 25, 2010 at 05:26
Thumb up Thumb down 0
archi says:

Meh. One trick pony.

 
# February 25, 2010 at 05:35
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Josh says:

Zaha Hadid better check herzog de meuron hamburg! there she will see a nice operaroom!!!

 
# February 25, 2010 at 05:48
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Małgorzata says:

Blob on blob

 
# February 25, 2010 at 05:57
Thumb up Thumb down 0
tim says:

archi got it: one trick pony. kind of looks like the inside of a cow´s bowel…

 
# February 25, 2010 at 06:14
Thumb up Thumb down 0
dev says:

where can i get to see the other entries…would love to go through delugan meissls entry..

 
# February 25, 2010 at 06:31
Thumb up Thumb down 0

It is new trend of course… Blow in geometry shape. But… Actualy, I don’t understand why it is allways Z.H.???… A lot of other architects has same ideas, however she is on top… I don’t like this situation…

 
# February 25, 2010 at 07:02
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    SAD says:

    Develop your own style!!! Then, maybe you can get featured too, and who knows it may be that another wining person comes and thinks you are Americas Next Top Architect…

     
    # February 25, 2010 at 09:16
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Dan says:

Yet another sculpture masquerading as architecture.

 
# February 25, 2010 at 08:21
Thumb up Thumb down 0
el cowboy says:

Great? Well I didn’t see any plans, sections or even diagrams, so for all I know Dan is right on: sculpture instead of architecture. There’s no problem with being grandiose as long as there’s a concept, a purpose or a problem to solve. But here there’s none of that; it’s form for form’s sake [there's even no hint of material]. I can’t see how there’s any architectural progress with this project. It seems to be another self-indulgent solipsit exersice of ego, to jerk-off someone else’s [Mr. Abdullah #2]. Of course I’d love to hear anyone defend its merits…

 
# February 25, 2010 at 09:58
    Thumb up Thumb down 0
    richard says:

    well she won the competition, so any critique of her proposal is kind of nullified. unless you’re paying for the building….

     
    # February 27, 2010 at 13:35
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      el cowboy says:

      …Well, I guess that arguments trumps any kind of criticism, for this project and any other, and by extension this whole section on ArchDaily wouldn’t exist. End of story, right?

       
      # February 27, 2010 at 14:40
      Thumb up Thumb down 0
      Dan says:

      Because popular opinion/the opinion of X amount of judges is unquestionable?

       
      # February 27, 2010 at 17:21
Thumb up Thumb down 0
Polina says:

Any plans? Sections?
So far – it’s just a form. Very Hadid, obviously, but sort of inverted inside out. Instead of free standing blurb, it’s a blurb within a box.
Agree with Dan – “sculpture masquerading as architecture”.

 
# February 25, 2010 at 10:24
Thumb up Thumb down 0
danklyn says:

not usually a fan of Zaha Hadid's design sensibility but this is awesome: http://bit.ly/b1syvg

 
# February 25, 2010 at 11:28
Thumb up Thumb down 0
igor says:

The project is very organic(orgazmic)and very futuristic. Bravo Zaha. Plans and cross sections,please!

 
# February 25, 2010 at 12:19
Thumb up Thumb down 0
yabbo says:

Acoustics? hard surfaces everywhere? They need an acoustician badly!

 
# March 1, 2010 at 16:47
Thumb up Thumb down 0
ik says:

hmm much better than other Zahas

 
# June 8, 2010 at 10:42
Thumb up Thumb down 0
wpolscemamymocneseo says:

Hi….thanks for this good information.I’m so happy because it’s very useful for my thesis research.I hope you will keep updating your content constantly as you have one dedicated reader here :)

 
# January 11, 2011 at 17:57
Thumb up Thumb down 0

11:54 AM Jul 12th

Gorgeous architecture. Great scale and fluidity. Would love to see this. King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art http://bit.ly/aY7ahk

Thumb up Thumb down 0

10:02 AM Apr 23rd

IMPRESSIVE! King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art / Zaha Hadid Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/5h9dMJG via @archdaily #Jo #Amman

Thumb up Thumb down 0

10:40 AM Apr 23rd

RT @EvelynZoubi: IMPRESSIVE! King Abdullah II House of Culture & Art / Zaha Hadid Architects | ArchDaily http://t.co/5h9dMJG via @archda …

Thumb up Thumb down 0

6:46 PM Nov 2nd

Dit gebouw bijvoorbeeld, wat ze daar kan met beton en glas, zo ongelofelijk mooi:
http://t.co/RFUdMxfs

Leave a Reply »

 

Latest Comments »

Has archdaily started a new...[+]
I’ll add one, based on these comments: Architects are easily offended.[+]
Just something he learned from Rem Koolhaas, again and again...[+]
Why not try and improve the existing...[+]
What even is that lake room oval thing!!?? I still don’t know…[+]

Upcoming Architecture Events »

got events? invite us! click here

Architecture Books & Magazines »

The Architecture of Croce, Aflalo and Gasperini / Aflalo and Gasperini Architects

The Architecture of Croce, Aflalo and Gasperini / Aflalo and Gasperini Architects

Aflalo & Gasperini Arquitetos recently shared with us the book they are launching titled, “The Architecture of Croce, Aflalo and Gasperini.” The book details the 50 years history of one of the most important architecture office in Brazil. The…

 

Encyclopedia of Detail in Contemporary Residential Architecture

Encyclopedia of Detail in Contemporary Residential Architecture

French novelist Gustave Flaubert’s expression, “le bon Dieu est le détail” became a cliché for one reason, it is true. God does dwell in the details, and well done details are often the difference between a mundane building and…

 

Bolles+Wilson / A Handbook Of Productive Paradigms

01

“Established initially in London in 1980 and based in Germany since 1988 the architectural office of Bolles + Wilson has firmly established itself as an international practice underpinned by thorough research and theoretical discourse. This monograph chronicles a variety

 

Our partners »

AD on iPad via Pulse

Browse by date »

Browse by category »

Friends »