<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:40:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-226563</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-226563</guid>
		<description>i really don&#039;t think this lovely little house deserve such a strong criticism. cute tiny home, not more, not less. i am personally very happy to see it here on archdaily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really don&#8217;t think this lovely little house deserve such a strong criticism. cute tiny home, not more, not less. i am personally very happy to see it here on archdaily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panda</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-117103</link>
		<dc:creator>panda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-117103</guid>
		<description>Who is Francine Fort??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is Francine Fort??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tired</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-116838</link>
		<dc:creator>tired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-116838</guid>
		<description>Just in plan, section, elevation and the relationship to the larger site. The courtyard, in relationship to the interior spaces, is poorly proportioned and takes away from the spaces instead of adding to their interest and complexity. The photography is exemplary, bravo wide angle lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in plan, section, elevation and the relationship to the larger site. The courtyard, in relationship to the interior spaces, is poorly proportioned and takes away from the spaces instead of adding to their interest and complexity. The photography is exemplary, bravo wide angle lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maison 51 &#124; CoolBoom</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-116522</link>
		<dc:creator>Maison 51 &#124; CoolBoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-116522</guid>
		<description>[...] Via ArchDaily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via ArchDaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambra</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-115619</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-115619</guid>
		<description>H A R M L E S S  +  B O R I N G 
&amp; cute (which is an insult)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H A R M L E S S  +  B O R I N G<br />
&amp; cute (which is an insult)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squidly</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-115170</link>
		<dc:creator>squidly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-115170</guid>
		<description>How is it inept?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it inept?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tired</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114906</link>
		<dc:creator>tired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114906</guid>
		<description>Looks like a child drew a courtyard house. I love simplicity but this is just inept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a child drew a courtyard house. I love simplicity but this is just inept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patient soul</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114783</link>
		<dc:creator>patient soul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114783</guid>
		<description>so here we see a decent house which attracts to its simplicity and two gentlemens fighting each other .. one means to say that the other gets aroused to the dramatic dressup of a hooker .. and dosent feel the passion of simplistic beauty .. but the other cant change ..its his nature .. and thats all bring &#039;im different &#039; thing in us bravo u two

4 me the design is bent on proving few things 

1) living together
2) living with the nature
3) living good without excessive expenditures
4) maintaining well, what you can ! with just your earning than mortgage 

hope this is also a part of every dwellings planned 4 which a artitect is ever called up not just 2 share his bling bling ..

ne wayz i like this post as it inspires me a lot .. of a money worthy dwelling .. hope im not hurting .. pplzz who have exotic tastes ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so here we see a decent house which attracts to its simplicity and two gentlemens fighting each other .. one means to say that the other gets aroused to the dramatic dressup of a hooker .. and dosent feel the passion of simplistic beauty .. but the other cant change ..its his nature .. and thats all bring &#8216;im different &#8216; thing in us bravo u two</p>
<p>4 me the design is bent on proving few things </p>
<p>1) living together<br />
2) living with the nature<br />
3) living good without excessive expenditures<br />
4) maintaining well, what you can ! with just your earning than mortgage </p>
<p>hope this is also a part of every dwellings planned 4 which a artitect is ever called up not just 2 share his bling bling ..</p>
<p>ne wayz i like this post as it inspires me a lot .. of a money worthy dwelling .. hope im not hurting .. pplzz who have exotic tastes ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uyyu</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114726</link>
		<dc:creator>uyyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114726</guid>
		<description>NO, it&#039;s not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, it&#8217;s not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frix</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114717</link>
		<dc:creator>Frix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114717</guid>
		<description>to squidly: Francine Fort get out this body!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to squidly: Francine Fort get out this body!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squidly</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114714</link>
		<dc:creator>squidly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114714</guid>
		<description>A well done, simple urban house lacking in the bullsit usually required to be &quot;noticed&quot;.  i find its straightforwardness refreshing and disagree completely with the comment about the facade.  The composition, with large opening pushed off into the corner, disrupts an expected symmetry set up by the upper level windows and allows for the horizontal window below, which imparts a quiet dynamism in proportion with such a small project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well done, simple urban house lacking in the bullsit usually required to be &#8220;noticed&#8221;.  i find its straightforwardness refreshing and disagree completely with the comment about the facade.  The composition, with large opening pushed off into the corner, disrupts an expected symmetry set up by the upper level windows and allows for the horizontal window below, which imparts a quiet dynamism in proportion with such a small project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frix</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114596</link>
		<dc:creator>Frix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114596</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re saying that because of illusion produced by oversized FOV photographics ; it must be about 120° or more on these views, I don&#039;t think you would feel the same with your 60°&#039;s one.
What is said about elevation is true for the plan too; poor work on proportion between patio and interior.
I&#039;m still wondering why this terrible thing laid in an architecture blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re saying that because of illusion produced by oversized FOV photographics ; it must be about 120° or more on these views, I don&#8217;t think you would feel the same with your 60°&#8217;s one.<br />
What is said about elevation is true for the plan too; poor work on proportion between patio and interior.<br />
I&#8217;m still wondering why this terrible thing laid in an architecture blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zane</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114528</link>
		<dc:creator>Zane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114528</guid>
		<description>The street elevation is terrible, very little attention to proportion and rectilinear relationships make the street facade bland, and of no energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The street elevation is terrible, very little attention to proportion and rectilinear relationships make the street facade bland, and of no energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Cowen</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-171842</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Cowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-171842</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Lovely home in France. RT @HomeDecorNews Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes http://bit.ly/9Hllvd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Lovely home in France. RT @HomeDecorNews Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes <a href="http://bit.ly/9Hllvd" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9Hllvd</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Decor News</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-171843</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Decor News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-171843</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes http://bit.ly/9Hllvd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes <a href="http://bit.ly/9Hllvd" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9Hllvd</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114426</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114426</guid>
		<description>I like it - a lot. The combination of natural light and open, outdoor privacy is something you don&#039;t see all that often in small houses. Were it not for an arthritic hip that makes going up and down stairs a pain (literally), I&#039;d certainly live in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it &#8211; a lot. The combination of natural light and open, outdoor privacy is something you don&#8217;t see all that often in small houses. Were it not for an arthritic hip that makes going up and down stairs a pain (literally), I&#8217;d certainly live in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reger</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114397</link>
		<dc:creator>reger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114397</guid>
		<description>The answer is NO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is NO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Decor News</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-171844</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Decor News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-171844</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes http://bit.ly/aNBOcs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes <a href="http://bit.ly/aNBOcs" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aNBOcs</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-114375</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-114375</guid>
		<description>(°_°) ? the smile in the elevation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(°_°) ? the smile in the elevation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assis Haubert</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/50585/maison-51-fabredemarien-architectes/#comment-171845</link>
		<dc:creator>Assis Haubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=50585#comment-171845</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes http://archdai.ly/afESeC &lt;&lt; #architecture&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: Maison 51 / FABRE/deMARIEN architectes <a href="http://archdai.ly/afESeC" rel="nofollow">http://archdai.ly/afESeC</a> &lt;&lt; #architecture</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 15:05:29 by W3 Total Cache -->
