Your inquiry seems a bit severe to me…Maybe the walls are not a mere expression of ego… But rather, in their attampt to emulate a surface chroma and texture (via limmitless surface effect potential born in concrete material plasticity) that is a reflection of the surrounding ground condition, the project is referencing the landscape (good contextual sensitivity) instead of plopping something down upon it as a disassociated object in a field.(see: calatrava, ghery, american suburbs, etc..) Formally, however, to your point, the profile does not evoke or recall even a memory of the context. I have no problem with this. As an architect, maybe they couldnt resist calling out contrast between the landscape and their object by giving it a strong planar reading, rather than blending it with the landscape via more integrated elevation/sectional profiles. Great sections!
Dave
This is a good example of ‘habitable poche’.

best