Cooper Union Students Campaign to Keep Architecture Education Free

With the news earlier this year that The Cooper Union in New York will, for the first time in 155 years, begin charging tuition fees to students in 2014, the existing students at its Irwin S. Chanin School of Architecture are taking steps to ensure that it stays true to the meritocratic principles on which it was founded. To achieve this, they have launched the One Year Fund, an attempt to crowdsource $600,000 in order to cover the tuition fees of the incoming students in 2014.

Read more about the One Year Fund, and how it fits into the students’ larger aims, after the break.

From their campaign, it is clear the students feel that not having to pay tuition is fundamental to the nature of , and gives an important aspect to their education as architects. “Charging tuition adds money to the equation and changes the relationships that are already in place”, says one student. In their press release, they state ”it is imperative to ensure that future students are educated under the same meritocratic conditions as they are today and have been for the past 155 years.”

Raising $600,000 in 40 days may be an ambitious goal, but it is a vital step in preserving what they see as a vital element of the education of future students. This first step is a temporary solution, simply aiming to provide “one full year to develop and put into action another financial model to preserve  and its fundamental principles.”

If the principle of a free, meritocratic education for architects is an idea you would like to support, you can donate on their fundraising page. you can also connect with the One Year Fund via Facebook and Twitter.

Cite: Stott, Rory. "Cooper Union Students Campaign to Keep Architecture Education Free" 02 Dec 2013. ArchDaily. Accessed 17 Sep 2014. <>


  1. Thumb up Thumb down -13

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • Thumb up Thumb down -5

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • Thumb up Thumb down +8

      I’d demand a refund if I were you. Poor grammar, polarized politics and ageism do not an educated person make.

    • Thumb up Thumb down +1

      If you are like most students, you probably paid for a sub-par education not nearly worth what came out of your pocket. The “whiners” who study at the Cooper Union are privileged enough to learn from some of the best thinkers in the world. You don’t need to pay for education in order for it to be among intellectuals. Perhaps if you stepped out of your limited/conservative point of view you would realize that education is priceless. And by the way, we are entitled to this education anyone who tells you otherwise is a slave to the capitalist system.

    • Thumb up Thumb down +2

      Did you read the article?

      This has nothing to do with self-reliance, political affiliation or responsibility. It seems to be CURRENT students doing the campaign. That implies that they don’t have to pay at all, and are standing for the principle. There’s a reason why the school is selective. The loan they avoided is a privilege they enjoy for being competitive enough to merit it. Just as the loan(s) you took out could be viewed as a penalty for your inability to secure a better deal.

    • Thumb up Thumb down 0

      Did you read the article? This has nothing to do with self-reliance, political affiliation or respo

  2. Thumb up Thumb down -1

    Nobody gets truly free education, you have to work or pay for it somehow. At some point, you have to connect to real world economies whether it’s your own pocket or someone else’s.

    The Bauhaus attempted to gain autonomy from the state by selling some of their wares. Despite their failures, this may be an economically sustainable path for the future, but economic realities and work may scare of some of the more speculation oriented students.

  3. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    meanwhile, thousands of architecture students are paying thousands of dollars everywhere else in the US public universities, going into debt, without asking random people to pay for their private university costs.

    • Thumb up Thumb down +3

      Education is not a material thing you pay for. Education is something more critical then something like buying an ipad. When you pay for education and treat it like a product you completely loose the criticality of the eduction you are receiving. That renders it useless, or at least less useful. I would say the criticality of the received education is definitely extremely important, especially in the field of architecture. Why do you think the current world is being filled with the most thoughtless forms and architectures ? – because of people who think learning how to pay for a loan is more important than actually learning.

  4. Thumb up Thumb down -3

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  5. Thumb up Thumb down -1

    They need to grow up and realize life is not free. Every other architecture school requires students to pay tuition. Now that they have to pay for school they want other people to pay for them while thousands of other students pay tuition at every other school and don’t make videos asking other people to give them money. I would have loved for someone to pay for my schooling but I’m paying for it myself through loans and working.

    Nothing is stopping them form taking out loans like the rest of the world.

  6. Thumb up Thumb down 0

    After paying $130k for undergrad I am applying to grad school to the tune of another $60k. I think more payed competitions/grant work would benefit architecture students as a whole a lot more than the 50 kids at CU.

  7. Thumb up Thumb down +2

    free…free architectural education…why did i NOT know about this. i’m taking a year off right now from architectural education to work so i can pay for it. i’ll pay what i earned in a year if i get in this place and it stays free. what the heck. what have i been doing. free architectural education…

  8. Thumb up Thumb down +3

    Well, here in Brazil, higher education is completely free and state-funded. Of course, the rest is not, but still it’s a solution for higher education: we pay taxes, you know. If the state can pay for high schools, why can’t it pay for higher education?

  9. Thumb up Thumb down -4

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Share your thoughts