ArchDaily | Broadcasting Architecture Worldwidethe world's most visited architecture website
i

Sign up now and start saving and organizing your favorite architecture projects and photos

i

Find the most inspiring products for your projects in our Product Catalog.

i

Get the ArchDaily Chrome Extension and be inspired with every new tab. Install here »

All
Projects
Products
Events
Competitions
  1. ArchDaily
  2. Competitions
  3. Diller Scofidio + Renfro's Winning Proposal for Zaryadye Park: "Wild Urbanism"

Diller Scofidio + Renfro's Winning Proposal for Zaryadye Park: "Wild Urbanism"

Diller Scofidio + Renfro's Winning Proposal for Zaryadye Park: "Wild Urbanism"

UPDATE: The video detailing Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal for Moscow's Zaryadye Park has just been released. In it the three partners discuss the central idea behind the proposal - "Wild Urbanism" - in which plants and people are of equal importance and "nature and architecture are merged into a seamless whole." They explain how each of Russia's varied landscapes - its tundra, steppe, forest, and wetland - will be imported to the park and overlapped into "enfolded nodes" that will house sustainable, artificial micro-climates that will allow for year-round use of the park. 

The Strelka Institute has announced the winner of the two-stage international competition to design Zaryadye park, Moscow's first park in over 50 years: Diller Scofidio + Renfro.

The consortium led by the New York-based firm, beat out an impressive shortlist. Russian-led TPO “Reserve” came second and MVRDV third.

Zaryadye Park, 13 acres of land just a minute’s walk from the Kremlin and the Red Square, is hoped to “project a new image of Moscow and Russia to the world.” See the renderings from Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal for Moscow's new and most important public space, after the break...

Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal - Masterplan. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka Entrance from the Red Square - Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka +6

Diller Scofidio + Renfro's Winning Proposal for Zaryadye Park: "Wild Urbanism", Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Entrance from the Red Square - Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Entrance from the Red Square - Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal - Masterplan. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Diller Scofidio + Renfro's winning proposal - Masterplan. Image Courtesy of KB Strelka
Cite: Vanessa Quirk. "Diller Scofidio + Renfro's Winning Proposal for Zaryadye Park: "Wild Urbanism"" 19 Nov 2013. ArchDaily. Accessed . <http://www.archdaily.com/447637/diller-scofidio-renfro-win-zaryadye-park-competition/>
Read comments

9 Comments

Ben · December 12, 2013

To me, the issue is not the level of rigor in the intellectual framework so much as how easily that framework could be appropriated by Disneyworld.

Nick · November 27, 2013

I think this is a very interersting project. I would argue it is just as conceptually rigourous as any of the Parc Vilette proposals but that the concept, in this case, comes from an analysis of the macro (national) context, the role of Moscow within Russia and an exploration of how time (in the seasonal sense) can be edited. In what way is this a less valid conceptual investigation than Eisenmann or Tcshumi's philisophical approach (Derrida, Decontrucivism etc...) or Koolhaas' horizontal version of Delirious New York's programmatic arguement? All 4 of these are conceptually sound and thoroughly designed.

luke · November 13, 2013

is it just me or does this look a bit sh*t? Maybe its very conceptual and I just cant be ar@sed reading the small print. I hope it looks brilliant at eye level and I will be proved wrong.

Joe Schmo · November 13, 2013

I don't care what the concept is: this design looks horrible and is not a space i'd like to inhabit. space planning fail.

Beckster · November 13, 2013

hopefully this will go the way of their arberdeen project and be a non-starter. historically significant constructivist projects are rotting all over moscow without anyone doing a thing to preserve them, but they want to build this in the heart of the city?? that city needs to realign its priorities.

Michael · November 13, 2013

It's troubling that the most compelling image, by far, is the one with the yellow trees. And that's the one that has nothing to do with their proposed architecture...

flytoget · November 12, 2013

That is to say that the story is amazingly thin for a company that prides itself on being a conceptual heavy weight. Converging the elements of Russian, tundra, prairie and woods and replicating (!) their bioclimatic conditions for the purpose of popular recreation??.. I´m ok with DS+R being an ill-informed foreign "star" that does international competitions for the sweet cocktail of PR and (potentially) big bucks. But they could do better than that... Or perhaps they couldn´t and this entry represents their obvious intellectual limitation? As for the competition itself, this whole undertaking was as bad a mistake as taking a decision on tearing down the Hotel Russia several years ago.

Corbu · November 13, 2013 02:11 AM

"[or perhaps] this entry represents their obvious intellectual limitation?"

You haven't been paying much attention to Diller's work lately, have you? It's been garbage since the Blur Building. They keep repeating the same few tricks over and over again - this is just the latest casualty.

flytoget · November 12, 2013

The story is amazingly thin for a company that prides itself on being a conceptual heavy-weight. Converging the elements of Russian tundra, prairie and woods and replicating their bioclimatic condition (!) for the purpose of popular recreation??... I´m ok with DS+R being a typical ill-informed foreign "star" doing it for sweet cocktail of PR and (potentially) big bucks. But they could do better than that... Or perhaps they wouldn´t and this entry vividly reflects their intellectual limitation? As for the the actual competition... This whole undertaking is as big a mistake as was the decision to tear down the Hotel Russia several years ago.

NXS · November 12, 2013

The site plan...what?? A blob here, a squiggle there, and a bunch of peel-up-the-corner's everywhere else (it is DS+R, after all).

What a mess. I'd be interested to see what the other teams produced, but if this is the winner, we've seriously regressed since the La Villette days of intelligent public park competitions with clear, interesting concepts, rather than confetti of 'stuff' thrown all over a site.

H-J · November 12, 2013 10:14 PM

Wasn't "confetti of stuff" part of the concept behind both Tschumi's and OMA's Vilette entry?

···

Comments are closed

Read comments