<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New sustainable building for London by Sheppard Robson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaa moflah</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/#comment-230747</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaa moflah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4459#comment-230747</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t really like the shape of the building. but the diagrid system( diagonal bracing )made it look interesting.
actually  i don&#039;t see it as crystal, because the tube shape make it look more like a pipe than a crystal.
The other good thing about the diagrid system besides giving it an interesting facade, is that the plans will be column-free, and it allows the maximum natural light through the building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t really like the shape of the building. but the diagrid system( diagonal bracing )made it look interesting.<br />
actually  i don&#8217;t see it as crystal, because the tube shape make it look more like a pipe than a crystal.<br />
The other good thing about the diagrid system besides giving it an interesting facade, is that the plans will be column-free, and it allows the maximum natural light through the building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renoir</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/#comment-80472</link>
		<dc:creator>renoir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4459#comment-80472</guid>
		<description>sustainability_energy efficient_breeam and so on....I can&#039;t stand it anymore - sometimes only excuses for tasteless architecture. 
why do they all try to fool us with full glass buildings that are not sustainable at all? In 20 years or so we will look at this style and wish it was never been build, when we realized it was not the answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sustainability_energy efficient_breeam and so on&#8230;.I can&#8217;t stand it anymore &#8211; sometimes only excuses for tasteless architecture.<br />
why do they all try to fool us with full glass buildings that are not sustainable at all? In 20 years or so we will look at this style and wish it was never been build, when we realized it was not the answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistair</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4459#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth noting that Breeam &#039;excellent&#039; ratings dont go anywhere near making a building like this green. the ratings emphasise thinks like cycle parking and plant species as much as energy consuption. it&#039;s relatively straightforward to get the rating with some creative report writing on a standard building.

and i wouldn&#039;t trust shepherd to make anything iconic.. it&#039;s just another blob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that Breeam &#8216;excellent&#8217; ratings dont go anywhere near making a building like this green. the ratings emphasise thinks like cycle parking and plant species as much as energy consuption. it&#8217;s relatively straightforward to get the rating with some creative report writing on a standard building.</p>
<p>and i wouldn&#8217;t trust shepherd to make anything iconic.. it&#8217;s just another blob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4459#comment-2112</guid>
		<description>It just looks like a hybrid of 30 St Mary Axe and London City Hall, both by Foster and Partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just looks like a hybrid of 30 St Mary Axe and London City Hall, both by Foster and Partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUST COOL Design Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>JUST COOL Design Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4459#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>like a jewel in the sky...
interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like a jewel in the sky&#8230;<br />
interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xing</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4459/new-sustainable-building-for-london-by-sheppard-robson/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>xing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4459#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>I would like to know what kind of energy this build collect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know what kind of energy this build collect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-11 05:05:28 by W3 Total Cache -->
