I must admit, I never understood the aesthetics of “large-size concrete elements” used as pathways. The whole green area looks like a _parody_ of a park.

while just schematically drawn, I think they pretty much reflect what you’d always expect to see from an atrium building that relies on some sort of thermal mass for night air cooling and stack/cross ventilation through an atrium used for daylighting purposes. Looking at the drawings, there’s no obvious typological fluke in there that would contradict said climate concepts. However, I’m quite certain that someone must have modeled the expected performance to check for the unexpected.. I hope! But I still agree with you, DomkiZ, there’s always a danger of “magic arrows”!!