<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiscavaig / Rural Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centor4</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-427402</link>
		<dc:creator>Centor4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-427402</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Fiscavaig / Rural Design &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/1p0AGrE via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Fiscavaig / Rural Design | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/1p0AGrE" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/1p0AGrE</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monta</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-83609</link>
		<dc:creator>Monta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-83609</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.archdaily.com/42143 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/42143" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/42143</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-82797</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-82797</guid>
		<description>Lovely work.  Kudos to Rural Design.      

To TBX, take the time to look at the plat and the photos which clearly show this to be in close proximity to other cabins.  I count a minimum of 12 with 8 clearly visible in the background of photo 5.  

To wratherford, I am assuming the second bath you speak of is that which houses the composting toilet.  I for one thought it an ingenious solution to provide a low impact alternative to a traditional leach field.  Keeping it semi-separated from the main body of the cabin likely reduces any objectionable odors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely work.  Kudos to Rural Design.      </p>
<p>To TBX, take the time to look at the plat and the photos which clearly show this to be in close proximity to other cabins.  I count a minimum of 12 with 8 clearly visible in the background of photo 5.  </p>
<p>To wratherford, I am assuming the second bath you speak of is that which houses the composting toilet.  I for one thought it an ingenious solution to provide a low impact alternative to a traditional leach field.  Keeping it semi-separated from the main body of the cabin likely reduces any objectionable odors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BAJ</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-82373</link>
		<dc:creator>BAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-82373</guid>
		<description>A gem!

The critiques cease to amaze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gem!</p>
<p>The critiques cease to amaze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wratherford</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-82251</link>
		<dc:creator>wratherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-82251</guid>
		<description>as one who has holidayed in skye, the north narrowness is appropriate due to some fairly brutal winds and weathering. it is not a benign environment at all, even in summer, and especially not in winter. I applaud the simple form, but a second bath next to another? seems like a poor trade-off. horrid light fixtures ruin the interior for me, and the stair landing should have been an opportunity for hearth and seating by the stove. not as good/informal as sea ranch, not as good/minimal as sejima, but not bad at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as one who has holidayed in skye, the north narrowness is appropriate due to some fairly brutal winds and weathering. it is not a benign environment at all, even in summer, and especially not in winter. I applaud the simple form, but a second bath next to another? seems like a poor trade-off. horrid light fixtures ruin the interior for me, and the stair landing should have been an opportunity for hearth and seating by the stove. not as good/informal as sea ranch, not as good/minimal as sejima, but not bad at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simonmeek</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-87605</link>
		<dc:creator>simonmeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-87605</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;I want to live here: http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">I want to live here: <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Murney</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-82205</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Murney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-82205</guid>
		<description>Lovely wee building, but such a shame about the accompanying text. It&#039;s astonishing that someone can design so well and write so badly e.g. it is actually possible for a building which sits directly on the ground (as opposed to having quite clever and economic mini-pile foundations) to relate to its surroundings. Also, it&#039;s not necessary to tell us that windows draw light into the interior! The stated logic of why the building is narrower to the north - to reduce surface area - is entirely negated by the fact that it&#039;s fully glazed. Less archi-blather and more building information next time would be good - you know: client, brief, materials choice, context. Or am I just eschewing convention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely wee building, but such a shame about the accompanying text. It&#8217;s astonishing that someone can design so well and write so badly e.g. it is actually possible for a building which sits directly on the ground (as opposed to having quite clever and economic mini-pile foundations) to relate to its surroundings. Also, it&#8217;s not necessary to tell us that windows draw light into the interior! The stated logic of why the building is narrower to the north &#8211; to reduce surface area &#8211; is entirely negated by the fact that it&#8217;s fully glazed. Less archi-blather and more building information next time would be good &#8211; you know: client, brief, materials choice, context. Or am I just eschewing convention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trimtab21</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-82054</link>
		<dc:creator>trimtab21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-82054</guid>
		<description>this is just an eye sore in a beautiful area! What a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is just an eye sore in a beautiful area! What a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andres</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-81956</link>
		<dc:creator>andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-81956</guid>
		<description>great work ! congratulations .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great work ! congratulations .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBX</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-81927</link>
		<dc:creator>TBX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-81927</guid>
		<description>The surroundings and views of the area are so serene, that I think a better solution could&#039;ve been given to creating a temporary living space.

It seems more like the builders wanted to create something that stood out from the surroundings. Which they also did inside by the view being wonderfully obstructed by the fireplace...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The surroundings and views of the area are so serene, that I think a better solution could&#8217;ve been given to creating a temporary living space.</p>
<p>It seems more like the builders wanted to create something that stood out from the surroundings. Which they also did inside by the view being wonderfully obstructed by the fireplace&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuf-Pak</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-81915</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuf-Pak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-81915</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice.  The site, form, and materials couldn&#039;t be more evocative of Sea-Ranch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice.  The site, form, and materials couldn&#8217;t be more evocative of Sea-Ranch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Decor News</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-87617</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Decor News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-87617</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Fiscavaig / Rural Design http://bit.ly/5Wn0Zs&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Fiscavaig / Rural Design <a href="http://bit.ly/5Wn0Zs" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5Wn0Zs</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matiss gr</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-87633</link>
		<dc:creator>matiss gr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-87633</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;architecture for scottish country side http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/ ,,loving the chipboard finishes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">architecture for scottish country side <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/</a> ,,loving the chipboard finishes</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orestis Tsinalis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-87649</link>
		<dc:creator>Orestis Tsinalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-87649</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily Fiscavaig / Rural Design http://bit.ly/4XUFcv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily Fiscavaig / Rural Design <a href="http://bit.ly/4XUFcv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4XUFcv</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickwallen</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-87655</link>
		<dc:creator>nickwallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-87655</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: Fiscavaig / Rural Design http://bit.ly/4XUFcv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: Fiscavaig / Rural Design <a href="http://bit.ly/4XUFcv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4XUFcv</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architecture Feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/42143/fiscavaig-rural-design/#comment-87669</link>
		<dc:creator>Architecture Feeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=42143#comment-87669</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Fiscavaig / Rural Design: 
Architects: Rural Design
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland
Client: Nick ... http://bit.ly/7WCkxP (Via @archdaily)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Fiscavaig / Rural Design:<br />
Architects: Rural Design<br />
Location: Isle of Skye, Scotland<br />
Client: Nick &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/7WCkxP" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7WCkxP</a> (Via @archdaily)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 10:28:18 by W3 Total Cache -->
