Comments on: Waterfall House / Andres Remy Arquitectos

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:53:54 +0000

Legit "waterfall house"
http://t.co/TVxbTbVR

By: andrew adams

andrew adams — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:34:04 +0000

Legit "waterfall house"
http://t.co/TVxbTbVR

By: Uros Smolnikar

Uros Smolnikar — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 06:22:07 +0000

Waterfall House / Andres Remy Arquitectos | ArchDaily http://t.co/V18Ojf6 via @archdaily

By: Mark Bailey

Mark Bailey — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:00:54 +0000

Dream house of the day: http://bit.ly/aNwnpN

By: tas yamos+

tas yamos+ — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:19:48 +0000

Reading: "Waterfall House / Andres Remy Arquitectos | ArchDaily"( http://twitthis.com/vzir5z )

By: -J

-J — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:52:07 +0000

I can see what you mean by “no sense of proportions”. I believe our craft is somehow degraded when we create spaces forced by a modulus or a recipe. (i.e. “a good living room should measure x by y”)

Don’t get me wrong, I know we need to take the industry/market standards into consideration; since that is the way we build. But don’t you get a feeling we are falling into the same clichés and justifying the phrase “we are creating a space…” with a desire to fit trends and appear in publications?

By the way, you’re right. It is easy to see the lack of relation among the different volumes, since they are so massive.

I don’t think this is a bad project at all; Mediocre? …Maybe.
Nice pictures do not make good architecture people.

Please excuse my english, it is just as mediocre as this project.

By: Michael Baugus

Michael Baugus — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:35:24 +0000

Nice water feature! Waterfall House / Andres Remy Arquitectos via arch/daily http://bit.ly/7Pmqgs

By: Creative Edge

Creative Edge — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:18:38 +0000

There are a couple of nice ideas in this house. The rationale for flipping the public spaces to the top and the private spaces below is not strong enough.

By: Creative Edge

Creative Edge — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:18:18 +0000

There are a couple of nice ideas in this house. The rationale for flipping the public spaces to the top and the private spaces is not strong enough.

By: Andrew Geber

Andrew Geber — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:35:06 +0000

i love it i love it i love it

By: Hustle Strategy » Blog Archive » Waterfall House

Hustle Strategy » Blog Archive » Waterfall House — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:32:36 +0000

[...] Here is a great example of imagination. This house has an amazing drive way, great lines from the side and a perfect backyard. The design on this is great all around. For more pics and details check out more at archdaily. [...]

By: Lucas Gray

Lucas Gray — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:14:44 +0000

just another example of incredible excess. It’s a shame really, that people feel they need these things. Go check out Architecture for Humanity and Rural Studio for some real amazing architecture – buildings with a foundation in social and environmental responsibility.

By: HW

HW — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:00:27 +0000

My guess is that the Owner, not you, wanted it, and that the Owner, not you, has paid for it to be in the house. I really like the house, but thats beside the point. I’m sure the owner got what they wanted, and that is the point.

By: lia henriques

lia henriques — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:59:46 +0000

Waterfall House / Andres Remy Arquitectos | ArchDaily: http://bit.ly/6axcQz via @addthis projeto simples, de boa solução!

By: Fonda LaShay Design | Blog

Fonda LaShay Design | Blog — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:03:25 +0000

[...] Architects: Andres Remy Arquitectos Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina Project Area: 340 sqm The waterfall house was conceived by the request of a young business man in a closed neighborhood. The particularities and requisites of the client, among with the lot’s characteristics, established the path to follow in the design process. [via archdaily] [...]

By: thomas foral

thomas foral — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:25:42 +0000

Waterfall House / Andres Remy Arquitectos | ArchDaily – http://shar.es/aEbiB

By: Tommy

Tommy — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:45:52 +0000

Everybody mentions the waterfall, that means there is “no” house.
Very basic design techniques and cheap furniture.
This house seems just for a decoration magazine, country life and people that do not have architectural knowledge.
Why so much focus on the water in the house when there is a lake just in front? Thats too much water…it is a design resource that is played out.

By: gn

gn — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:44:05 +0000

the perfect example for “adding architecture”

By: Wargo

Wargo — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:37:58 +0000

A house for a waterfall…

By: HW

HW — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:31:57 +0000

I guess I’m lost. This appears to be a well-designed house
just brimming with ideas and good architecture. Sure, you
personally may not like it, but your comments seem
somewhat juvenile without recognizing that there is indeed
depth and architecture here…