Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

The Met / WOHA

By Nico Saieh — Filed under: Housing , Selected , , ,
 
© Tim Griffith

© Tim Griffith

Architects: WOHA
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Project Team: Alina Yeo, Carina Tang, Cheah Boon Kwan, Gerry Richardson, Janita Han, Jose Nixon Sicat, Puiphai Khunawat, Punpong Wiwatkul, Techit Romraruk, Richard Hassell, Sim Choon Heok, Wong Mun Summ
Associated Architects: Tandem Architects
Owner / Developer: Pebble Bay Thailand Co. Ltd
Mechanical & Electrical Engineers: Lincolne Scott Ng Pte. Ltd.
Civil & Structural Engineers: Worley Pte. Ltd.
Landscape Architects: Cicada Pte. Ltd.
Site area: 11,360.5 sqm
Project area: 112,833.5 sqm
Total cost: US $132 M
Project year: 2004-2005
Construction year: 2005-2009
Photographs: Patrick Bingham & Tim Griffith

© Patrick Bingham © Patrick Bingham © Patrick Bingham © Patrick Bingham

WOHA’s design explores strategies of high-density living in a high-rise tropical environment.

The concept for The Met is to develop an advanced form of high-rise living for the tropics, developed less from western temperate models than from research on possibilities of low-wind, tropical climate in dense urban conditions. This project implemented several ideas developed originally for a competition in Singapore for public housing.

20th floor plan

20th floor plan

High-rise designs have traditionally followed temperate models, which were developed in New York or Chicago with cold weather and strong winds. This resulted in apartments that are compact, insulated from the exterior and without sun shading or overhangs. Buildings are protective shells designed to shield the inhabitants from the harsh weather.

By contrast, design for the tropics should take advantage of year-round warm weather, capture breezes, and be laid out for cross-ventilation, incorporating outdoor spaces, verandas and gardens. Buildings are framing devices of minimal environmental devices for an indoor-outdoor lifestyle.

© Patrick Bingham

© Patrick Bingham

section DD

section DD

This scheme is designed from first principles to create a better lifestyle for central city living in the tropics. Going high in the tropics means cooler breezes, less dust, more privacy, more security, less noise, better views. To take advantage of these conditions, the design incorporates a staggered arrangement of blocks that allow cross ventilation, views to both the city and the river, and enhance the gentle breezes by funneling them between towers. The gaps between the towers are bridged with sky gardens that provide exterior entertaining areas directly off living areas – pools and gardens.

© Patrick Bingham

© Patrick Bingham

The orientation of the staggered blocks allows the sun to daily penetrate between the blocks on its regular tropical sun-path.

The apartments’ interiors interact strongly with the exterior, with full height glazing, balconies, sky gardens and sky terraces. Sun shading and overhangs provide weather protection and screen and filter the strong tropical light. Walls of greenery provide sun-shading that convert heat into oxygen, improving local air quality.

ground floor plan

ground floor plan

© Patrick Bingham

© Patrick Bingham

Common areas are spread throughout the towers, offering inhabitants a variety of experiences, from the intricately designed carpet of water, stone and vegetation at ground level, to the extensive indoor-outdoor facilities at the pool level, to libraries, barbecues, and function areas at sky terraces.

The hotel block explores related ideas, providing guests with huge outdoor balconies incorporating water features and trees, staggering up the façade to provide a layer of interlocking external spaces.

 

24 comments »

Alexander says:

Amazingly insightful

 
# November 11, 2009 at 13:42
sullka says:

WOW!….that’s just…..massive.

Kinda looks like the WTC competition proposal by Meier and Eisenman. Not saying that’s not original, just that as with the WTC proposal, the thing is just too big for its site.

 
# November 11, 2009 at 14:29
dah says:

I went recently to Bangkok and saw this building. It is probably one of the ugliest buildings i have seen in my life. Really bad taste..

 
# November 11, 2009 at 14:30
laar says:

inside is much better than outside

 
# November 11, 2009 at 16:49
HW says:

Gorgeous and innovative!

 
# November 11, 2009 at 17:06
sparch says:

if this building doesn’t dominate skyline as it does now, i would’ve loved it more

 
# November 11, 2009 at 17:32
Zard0z says:

An excellent example of form following function. Not outwardly pretty, but a fine prototype for future refinement.

 
# November 11, 2009 at 21:13
Khiensak Seangklieng,Ph.D.ASA says:

The world Architecture Awards 2009,inspired by thai-ness by Singaporean architects……cool…

 
# November 11, 2009 at 22:19
archilocus says:

1 spoon of Gotham City, 3 spoons of 1960s social housing block. The pixelated pattern in the facade does not add any extra quality to the building, even messing things up, while the interior seems neat and well detailed.
I find rather strange to make two separate lift lobbies per floor (1 for 2 apartments) instead of trying to provide a larger one for 4 apartments which would certainly bring more spatial quality when you get out the lift. There might be some regulation behind that.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 00:51
    Pipol says:

    I am in Thailand and i can confirm you that there isnt regulation about lift.I also strange that Y WOHA pay attention to make the private for owner like this. Maybe the rich man dont wanna talk each other -_-”

     
    # November 12, 2009 at 07:09
      corbus says:

      Privacy is always of uttermost importance for developers in Asia. Less apartments per lobby makes the units more exclusive, higher price, better to sell. That could have played a role.

       
      # November 16, 2009 at 03:12
Kuldeep says:

This is wat we call as Out of Box thinking!! Superb!!

 
# November 12, 2009 at 01:33
nello says:

Another proof that the design of high-rise buidlings’ is really hard to handle.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 03:36
adf says:

but it’s really more about utopia…

 
# November 12, 2009 at 03:57
Arnold says:

logical, reliable (straight), quality, neat(accurate). But..is here any architectural concept? Idea? In fact, it’s three masts(stems) connected betweem connections. Very simply architectural decision, but not interesting like architectural CONCEPT. But it’s GOOD WORK.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 04:52
Tosh says:

Awful. Purely awful. Hate the shape, hate the colours.. don’t understand it, don’t like it enough to get to know it..

 
# November 12, 2009 at 05:55
JDR says:

I think it is just fantastic!
Why can a high-rise building not be a building.
Why does a skyscraper has to be designed like a pen or any other design object.
This is brutalism, constructivism and as much architecture as any other arty-farty curved skyscraper.

Spot on.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 08:59
Tee says:

I really like it.
From the front it looks very fragile and seems like made of grey carton i built my models of.
From the thin side it seems much more massive althoug is very slender. Futhermore from this poit of view it has a cool technical charism (i don´t exactly know what it reminds me of, but it has something of a radiator grill or a cooling system with fins).
The interior is really tasteful and simple
and i also think it fits very well in the local environment.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 10:41
Jamie says:

Hideous!

My heart goes out to all the Thai’s who must endure the look of this monstrosity.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 20:18
Katsudon says:

Yeah JDR! Totally agree! I love it! Finally something constructed, not fashion designed! But i agree one thing about breaking so strongly the skyline… This is a bit tough! But i would love to see such design here in Shanghai! It would make sense with a few adaptations to the local climate.
And also not very sure about the pixelated pattern is or isn’t a good idea.
But definitely this is awesome!!

 
# November 12, 2009 at 22:20
L dog says:

dont judge a book by its cover. but the inside and outside do not really relate as much as i think they should. all in all i think this was very interesting home-like spaces inside.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 23:25
d says:

what’s up with those pattern??

 
# November 13, 2009 at 03:28
levert says:

its beautiful. no more wine and perfum bottles.
just a plain old building with something to say (though I wouldn’t put that pattern on the sides…with plain color would be really beautiful).
nice work.

 
# November 13, 2009 at 08:08
w says:

This is the most beautiful high-rise building in Thailand ever!!!! Everything is perfect, except for those ugly pattern decorated around the building.

 
# November 14, 2009 at 10:57

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

kolohe on DK2 / ICE:
isn’t this already steven holl’s project for some scandinavian country?[+]
Same here.[+]
Agreed, but what aa probably means is that the design is lacking structure. This...[+]
I really hate this… no match at all.[+]
start on from middle rise building… and from that continue on other high rise...[+]
aa: the realms of possibilities are to be challenged, not simply accepted. most...[+]
ok, so which part of ‘these type of projects can’t be built and should not...[+]
looks like building on Tiny Toons films[+]
@giogio – drowning in pools is one of the major causes of kids...[+]
Glen, have you used the Spiral in a wheelchair? The bumps enable me to pause...[+]
Well, both are allowed, but “stadia” is more elegant… ;)[+]
It’s “stadia”, not “stadiums”[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »