Have you seen our interviews in High Definition?

Vadabus Square and St. Paul Church / Ginseng Chicken

By Karen Cilento — Filed under: Competitions , Cultural , News , Renovation , , ,
 

render-vabadus

Ginseng Chicken Architecture P.C. has proposed a renewed identity for the St. Paul Church and Vadabus Square in Rakvere, Estonia by attempting to integrate three disparate elements of the site into a cohesive design strategy for a main concert hall.   With Arvo Pärt’s musical legacy and contribution to the genre of minimal music in mind, non-organization and non-sequentiality became the main driving force behind the design of the annex and were then translated into an architectural language.

More images and further project description after the break.

The key aspects of minimal music consist of independent elements that are composed to create repetitive rhythms, patterning, and layering.  The architects communicated the characteristics of the music into the building by designing multiple entrances, fluidity between the interior and exterior, structural independence of annex to the existing building, multi -functional spaces, and a lack of hierarchy between programs represented as building massing.

elev-n

The enter the hall, the existing profile of the Church will remain and vistors will enter through a large glass encased lobby.  The annex allows for multiple entrances and opens to an open ground-level lobby. This lobby space is defined by the porous mesh screen, which ambiguously and fluidly defines the interior and exterior. All of the building’s main floors will be interconnected by single core, housing circulation and bathrooms. By organizing programmatic spaces vertically via elevator access, linearity is destroyed.  Each guest is able to directly access any floor or program without going through another. This reinforces Arvo Part’s musical idea that all individual elements that create a whole may have equal weight and significance, negating any linearity or hierarchy.

render-concerthall

The annex adjoins to the existing church creating a 37 cubic meter volume, the minimum envelope required to “complete” the pure geometric form of a cube. The skin of the volume is constructed of panels of perforated metal screens, the perforation of which is derived from the texture of a stone wall found in the Church, further helping to fuse the church and annex into a single entity characterized by geometrical and culturally symbolic purity.

render-arvoparthall

Architects: Ginseng Chicken Architecture P.C.

Location: Vadabus Square, Rakvere, Estonia

Client: The City of Rakvere

Project Type: Competition

Project team: Jeeyong An, Sang Hwa Lee, Yoon Kyung Park, Ulyong Moon, Sieun Lee, Jay Tsai, Hyuna Kang

Project Area: 2,800 sqm

Project year: 2009

 

18 comments »

wowdow says:

looks like a chicken cage… perfect for the firm’s name

 
# November 9, 2009 at 23:57
bshi says:

wow
i thought it was a prison

 
# November 10, 2009 at 00:41
gg says:

excellent project!

 
# November 10, 2009 at 01:09
t6nis says:

as the site is in a small city (~22000 people). I find its extremely overscaled project. + that the room program is max 1/4 of the proposed volume.

weak idea. sry.

 
# November 10, 2009 at 02:48
t6nis says:

to add some thoughts…

the contsepual idea is itriging, but it does not link to the conditions of site.

for example heating question. as i can understand, the cube is made from perforated metal. so the space between functions in cube seems to be outside room. i cant see myself in february (with minus 20 degrees C outside) giving away my coat ant walking trough the ipressive /but minus 20C/ space to the concert.

 
# November 10, 2009 at 02:54
EU says:

En mi humilde opinión es la “cosa” más fea, grosera, vasta y maleducada que se ha planteado en nombre de la arquitectura en los últimos ni tiempos.

No hay respeto por el entorno, con la escala, con las preexistencias… total, para meter cuatro cajitas mal puestas y sin gracia.

 
# November 10, 2009 at 04:03
Tee says:

It indeed looks like there’s still a Church, at least when you look at it the second time, but functional only as a foundation for the cube.
Apart from that an unexciting and uninspired architecture.
Even though I like the renderings.

 
# November 10, 2009 at 04:42
tuankt14b6 says:

may cong trinh nay co nhieu net doc dao va rat pha cach

 
# November 10, 2009 at 05:04
name says:

somebody has been looking at the caixa forum a little too much http://www.arcspace.com/architects/herzog_meuron/caixa/caixa.html

 
# November 10, 2009 at 06:29
by says:

great renderings… so what’s the concept of this project?

 
# November 10, 2009 at 09:57
Markansas says:

Is anyone else feel like it is Le Fresnoy, Part II.

 
# November 10, 2009 at 10:08
daily spread says:

at first sight i would agree with all the negative comments, but the longer i look at it, the more i start to like it!

yes, actually, i really like it.
it creates a landmark in/for this little village, and therefore even the big scale in the small context might be right….

 
# November 10, 2009 at 13:25
haha says:

btw, it’s VABADUS square, not vadabus. the architects have really delved into the competition brief, basically ignoring every requirement.

 
# November 10, 2009 at 13:56
arquipablo says:

the third image , the interior rendering is awesome….

 
# November 11, 2009 at 08:46
sullka says:

I signed in for this competition, I regret now not having sent an idea.

I’m guessing this team was more into teh “experimentation and conceptual” field, rather than a practical one. They’re waaaaaaaaaaaay out of the contest’s rules with that proposal

 
# November 11, 2009 at 10:00
as says:

we entered this competition and we placed in the final 3rd stage… This entry has a very interesting concept, great research but total disregard for the competition program…

… although i love the interior space…

one more thing the final shortlist was a total dissapointment except for Peter Cook’s entry…

the chosen scheme had, literally, piano notes on their urban square design… pathetic…

 
# November 12, 2009 at 01:41
Tosh says:

Again – “who’s got the nicest box” dick contest..

Not interested.. anymore. Before it was really nice and cute. Now – it’s nothing new.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 06:13
heitor says:

‘how to make a historical building disappear’

 
# November 15, 2009 at 18:42

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

Matteo on Milan Expo 2015 :
Hi. Leave your messages on http://www.milanoexpo-2015.ws/ blog.htm Thanks[+]
This is very nice.. I like the bright interconnected feel, the...[+]
really good. I love njiric+ works[+]
Visitability. By code (not everywhere though) you have to provide a...[+]
urban reef…so cool[+]
this is specials perfect school design, so makes students...[+]
great, very fluid[+]
:)[+]
Nice work people.[+]
very interesting, reminds me the deconstructivist times…. I hope...[+]
@miguel…i agree……@archilo...[+]
hahahahahaha……………[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »