<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zaha Hadid´s project rejected due to heat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin cci</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-964833</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin cci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-964833</guid>
		<description>Yep that&#039;s the problem with formalism but who cares it&#039;s worked for the Italians for years you never hear people talking of Ferrari and Lamborghini in the same sentence as comfort and reliability. Pretty always get chosen before kind hahahaha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep that&#8217;s the problem with formalism but who cares it&#8217;s worked for the Italians for years you never hear people talking of Ferrari and Lamborghini in the same sentence as comfort and reliability. Pretty always get chosen before kind hahahaha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mango</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-849653</link>
		<dc:creator>Mango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-849653</guid>
		<description>Interesting form, but not so interesting internal space, since when architecture has been designed to be viewed from outside, not been designed to be felt inside. So why do we need architecture? ? Just to look at??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting form, but not so interesting internal space, since when architecture has been designed to be viewed from outside, not been designed to be felt inside. So why do we need architecture? ? Just to look at??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architects&#8217; websites suck</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-186362</link>
		<dc:creator>Architects&#8217; websites suck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-186362</guid>
		<description>[...] I guess they can afford this in the short-term but as you can see from an earlier post, Zaha Hadid doesn&#8217;t get much love online.&#8221;, says Ivan. He added, &#8220;My advice, talk to my friend Gregor at SWISSLOGIC. He&#8217;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I guess they can afford this in the short-term but as you can see from an earlier post, Zaha Hadid doesn&#8217;t get much love online.&#8221;, says Ivan. He added, &#8220;My advice, talk to my friend Gregor at SWISSLOGIC. He&#8217;ll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gehry Gone Green? - Ecology</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-158003</link>
		<dc:creator>Gehry Gone Green? - Ecology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-158003</guid>
		<description>[...] an addition to the Middle East Centre at Oxford’s St. Antony’s College was rejected because of poor solar design and potential overheating. Tuning a building to the sun inevitably leads to climatic variation in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an addition to the Middle East Centre at Oxford’s St. Antony’s College was rejected because of poor solar design and potential overheating. Tuning a building to the sun inevitably leads to climatic variation in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-114425</link>
		<dc:creator>J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-114425</guid>
		<description>Although the project is interesting in form, it obviously doesn&#039;t respond to the program or climate. Reflective glass, electronic shades, and insulated panels are sticker solutions that should be unnecessary in good design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the project is interesting in form, it obviously doesn&#8217;t respond to the program or climate. Reflective glass, electronic shades, and insulated panels are sticker solutions that should be unnecessary in good design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIRTI</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-76981</link>
		<dc:creator>KIRTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-76981</guid>
		<description>i surely can do a better work.... n i can prove it.... any one out here can mail me on kirtiramolia@yahoo.com and try me.... u surely can try me.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i surely can do a better work&#8230;. n i can prove it&#8230;. any one out here can mail me on <a href="mailto:kirtiramolia@yahoo.com">kirtiramolia@yahoo.com</a> and try me&#8230;. u surely can try me&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-36458</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-36458</guid>
		<description>This is perfect. Holding a starchitect accountable for their innapropriate design! Just because she has a famous name doesn&#039;t mean the sun won&#039;t shine on her buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is perfect. Holding a starchitect accountable for their innapropriate design! Just because she has a famous name doesn&#8217;t mean the sun won&#8217;t shine on her buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jvl!o</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-36449</link>
		<dc:creator>jvl!o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-36449</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally agree with CABE, we must respect the local behavior, this means: environment, not just the sun and heat, also the surrounding buildings, i like a lot the new &quot;respectful&quot; projects, but come on, lets think and create equally, not just draft and forget the real world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally agree with CABE, we must respect the local behavior, this means: environment, not just the sun and heat, also the surrounding buildings, i like a lot the new &#8220;respectful&#8221; projects, but come on, lets think and create equally, not just draft and forget the real world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gurda</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-31741</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gurda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 22:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-31741</guid>
		<description>I might have taken the critics&#039; concerns seriously, but then reminded myself that Oxford&#039;s still in ENGLAND.  Sun?  . . . please.  Snarkiness aside, Zaha:  it would serve you well to keep in mind that the swoosh as a design choice isn&#039;t universally applicable.  Looked great in the Austrian transit stations, the German fire station, etc., but here you&#039;ve got a TV monitor splotched up onto a nice, unassuming old stone building using the mother of all caulk guns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might have taken the critics&#8217; concerns seriously, but then reminded myself that Oxford&#8217;s still in ENGLAND.  Sun?  . . . please.  Snarkiness aside, Zaha:  it would serve you well to keep in mind that the swoosh as a design choice isn&#8217;t universally applicable.  Looked great in the Austrian transit stations, the German fire station, etc., but here you&#8217;ve got a TV monitor splotched up onto a nice, unassuming old stone building using the mother of all caulk guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melit</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-28462</link>
		<dc:creator>melit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-28462</guid>
		<description>How in the world does she continue to get her minions to pump out such banal pudding?  My 3 year old son has a more sensitive hand.  Please, please, please do not give this woman any more publicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How in the world does she continue to get her minions to pump out such banal pudding?  My 3 year old son has a more sensitive hand.  Please, please, please do not give this woman any more publicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melon.group</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-27675</link>
		<dc:creator>melon.group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-27675</guid>
		<description>the problem of overheating from the southern side is a really simple one to solve. most of the sun rays get reflected due to the rays&#039; angle or blocked if the glazing is recessed (as in this case). so ppl, before you start criticising, take a look at the project. cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem of overheating from the southern side is a really simple one to solve. most of the sun rays get reflected due to the rays&#8217; angle or blocked if the glazing is recessed (as in this case). so ppl, before you start criticising, take a look at the project. cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-27604</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-27604</guid>
		<description>I think the CABE didnt have the guts to say they dont like the way it looks..so they put the blame on a window....!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the CABE didnt have the guts to say they dont like the way it looks..so they put the blame on a window&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alejandro</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-27486</link>
		<dc:creator>alejandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-27486</guid>
		<description>ugly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlbr</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-27341</link>
		<dc:creator>jlbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-27341</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always considered Hadid&#039;s architecture to be unfit for human-use, just pure mental masturbation with the use of 3d modeling software. 
This project is a sample of that. Consider the complete lack of respect or regard to the surrounding architecture. Now, if you are building an archive, well, damn it, give the use of the building you are designing some consideration!!! I think it&#039;s embarrassing her building gets the no-no because she and her employees did not give a flying hoot about the building&#039;s final use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always considered Hadid&#8217;s architecture to be unfit for human-use, just pure mental masturbation with the use of 3d modeling software.<br />
This project is a sample of that. Consider the complete lack of respect or regard to the surrounding architecture. Now, if you are building an archive, well, damn it, give the use of the building you are designing some consideration!!! I think it&#8217;s embarrassing her building gets the no-no because she and her employees did not give a flying hoot about the building&#8217;s final use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richie</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-17379</link>
		<dc:creator>Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-17379</guid>
		<description>While not normally being a fan of her projects, I like the look of this smaller scale intervention and I hope they figure out a way to get it built.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not normally being a fan of her projects, I like the look of this smaller scale intervention and I hope they figure out a way to get it built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mushab</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-17376</link>
		<dc:creator>mushab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-17376</guid>
		<description>i too agree what CABE has taken the action, coz space should be habitable before then the aesthetic n form, alltogether makes genious..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i too agree what CABE has taken the action, coz space should be habitable before then the aesthetic n form, alltogether makes genious..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhichart</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhichart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>I think principle ZH office use to generate architectural form now is resemble to the work of Eero Saarinen (TWA Terminal) and of Oscar Niemeyer . Those work of these two architects has been done many years ago when the use of concrete to shape the curve form was very popular at that time. Some of work looks like a spaceship (70s)but now she has more advantages driven by the computer aided design software and new material technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think principle ZH office use to generate architectural form now is resemble to the work of Eero Saarinen (TWA Terminal) and of Oscar Niemeyer . Those work of these two architects has been done many years ago when the use of concrete to shape the curve form was very popular at that time. Some of work looks like a spaceship (70s)but now she has more advantages driven by the computer aided design software and new material technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elegant.me &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Zaha is Too Hot to Handle</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>elegant.me &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Zaha is Too Hot to Handle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>[...] love Zaha Hadid and her ever-ingenious design team, so we were rather bummed to hear about the recent slip up. Hadid&#8217;s proposal for St Antony’s College in Oxford took some heat, literally, from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] love Zaha Hadid and her ever-ingenious design team, so we were rather bummed to hear about the recent slip up. Hadid&#8217;s proposal for St Antony’s College in Oxford took some heat, literally, from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fashion Week Daily - Chic Report &#187; Zaha is Too Hot to Handle</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>Fashion Week Daily - Chic Report &#187; Zaha is Too Hot to Handle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>[...] love Zaha Hadid and her ever-ingenious design team, so we were rather bummed to hear about the recent slip up. Hadid&#8217;s proposal for St Antony’s College in Oxford took some heat, literally, from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] love Zaha Hadid and her ever-ingenious design team, so we were rather bummed to hear about the recent slip up. Hadid&#8217;s proposal for St Antony’s College in Oxford took some heat, literally, from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/4005/zaha-hadid%c2%b4s-project-rejected-due-to-heat/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=4005#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>the second picture, looks like an xbox xD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the second picture, looks like an xbox xD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 23:01:28 by W3 Total Cache -->
