<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:25:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cad</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-74775</link>
		<dc:creator>cad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-74775</guid>
		<description>Unless you&#039;re Thom Mayne, the owners are always right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you&#8217;re Thom Mayne, the owners are always right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architecture+Molding</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89371</link>
		<dc:creator>Architecture+Molding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89371</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects http://su.pr/1vTYbi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects <a href="http://su.pr/1vTYbi" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/1vTYbi</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrem</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-74213</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-74213</guid>
		<description>Despite being such a gigantic mansion, the whole thing manages to look ultra-cheap, obviously IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite being such a gigantic mansion, the whole thing manages to look ultra-cheap, obviously IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archilocus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-74171</link>
		<dc:creator>archilocus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-74171</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll definitely not agree then.
I don&#039;t think comments are the place for essays, and I don&#039;t think I have to try to explain why this has little or nothing to do with folding. Probably depends on how you and I understand the word &quot;concept&quot;.
I would have preferred you to explain your point of view rather than posting such non constructive comments.
The thing is as smart as you want to seem to be, we&#039;ve learnt nothing from you while &quot;cad&quot; gave an interesting point about fire regulations in Santa Monica.
And if for you opinions are not productive, then better not read comments, you&#039;ll save your time and mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll definitely not agree then.<br />
I don&#8217;t think comments are the place for essays, and I don&#8217;t think I have to try to explain why this has little or nothing to do with folding. Probably depends on how you and I understand the word &#8220;concept&#8221;.<br />
I would have preferred you to explain your point of view rather than posting such non constructive comments.<br />
The thing is as smart as you want to seem to be, we&#8217;ve learnt nothing from you while &#8220;cad&#8221; gave an interesting point about fire regulations in Santa Monica.<br />
And if for you opinions are not productive, then better not read comments, you&#8217;ll save your time and mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stelina</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-74091</link>
		<dc:creator>stelina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-74091</guid>
		<description>If you can, instead of just naming obvious names, sum up a solid argument as to why folding is not an architectural concept, how the whole theoretical discussion around it is useless and irrelevant and how all the built examples have not enhanced and furthered the architectural discourse, I will be willing to listen and argue further.

Simply saying &quot;it has nothing for me to do with architectural concepts&quot; is an opinion, and everyone has one today. Frankly, opinions are not productive, and they matter little unless you can persuade me as to why I should care to think about yours.


Being polite also means being honest, and I was simply being honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can, instead of just naming obvious names, sum up a solid argument as to why folding is not an architectural concept, how the whole theoretical discussion around it is useless and irrelevant and how all the built examples have not enhanced and furthered the architectural discourse, I will be willing to listen and argue further.</p>
<p>Simply saying &#8220;it has nothing for me to do with architectural concepts&#8221; is an opinion, and everyone has one today. Frankly, opinions are not productive, and they matter little unless you can persuade me as to why I should care to think about yours.</p>
<p>Being polite also means being honest, and I was simply being honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar falcón lara</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-74009</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar falcón lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-74009</guid>
		<description>This house is indeed a boldly designed one and merits admiration. Great in every aspect, it may not please everyone, but it&#039;s great. ( and it is built, it pleases the most important person: the owners )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This house is indeed a boldly designed one and merits admiration. Great in every aspect, it may not please everyone, but it&#8217;s great. ( and it is built, it pleases the most important person: the owners )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archilocus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-73990</link>
		<dc:creator>archilocus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-73990</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stelina for setting me straight with such a scornful and haughty comment.
About folding, may you accept that i disagree with you? The folding of Van Berkel, Moussavi or other Lynn-like architects has nothing for me to do with architectural concepts, and i think we&#039;re quite far here to a philosophical discussion from Deleuze.
To go back to the topic, I&#039;d like to appreciate a house for itself, not through any kind of theoretical argument like the one you seem to be liking, and which seems to make you forget to be polite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stelina for setting me straight with such a scornful and haughty comment.<br />
About folding, may you accept that i disagree with you? The folding of Van Berkel, Moussavi or other Lynn-like architects has nothing for me to do with architectural concepts, and i think we&#8217;re quite far here to a philosophical discussion from Deleuze.<br />
To go back to the topic, I&#8217;d like to appreciate a house for itself, not through any kind of theoretical argument like the one you seem to be liking, and which seems to make you forget to be polite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stelina</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-73981</link>
		<dc:creator>stelina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-73981</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a diagram of the house, which would perhaps explain it better- photos often distort the logic and intent.

and clearly, &quot;archilocus&quot; is not at all familiar with the theoretical discussion of the fold that has occupied a prominent space in architectural discussions, work and writing for at least two decades now.

please do your homework before posting such ignorant and nonsensical comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a diagram of the house, which would perhaps explain it better- photos often distort the logic and intent.</p>
<p>and clearly, &#8220;archilocus&#8221; is not at all familiar with the theoretical discussion of the fold that has occupied a prominent space in architectural discussions, work and writing for at least two decades now.</p>
<p>please do your homework before posting such ignorant and nonsensical comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archilocus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-73969</link>
		<dc:creator>archilocus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-73969</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t misunderstand what proof200 or I said, it is not about giving or not giving big ideas to a small project. This house just lack the simplicity that should be resulting from a program of 4 bedrooms, bathrooms, a living room and a kitchen, no matter the concept. And honestly folding is not a concept, it&#039;s folding. It doesn&#039;t make any concept at all. And there are probably here more ideas than just &quot;folding&quot;, but the vision is so much disturbed by the additional noise of layers of different architectural vocabulary (different stair languages, the shape, the fancy pattern, pure white japanese style, etc.) that we cannot read a thing anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t misunderstand what proof200 or I said, it is not about giving or not giving big ideas to a small project. This house just lack the simplicity that should be resulting from a program of 4 bedrooms, bathrooms, a living room and a kitchen, no matter the concept. And honestly folding is not a concept, it&#8217;s folding. It doesn&#8217;t make any concept at all. And there are probably here more ideas than just &#8220;folding&#8221;, but the vision is so much disturbed by the additional noise of layers of different architectural vocabulary (different stair languages, the shape, the fancy pattern, pure white japanese style, etc.) that we cannot read a thing anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cad</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-73966</link>
		<dc:creator>cad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-73966</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re lights, vents and smoke detectors all are required
by building code. Santa Monica is one of the strictest, need to pass 5 different departments just for residential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re lights, vents and smoke detectors all are required<br />
by building code. Santa Monica is one of the strictest, need to pass 5 different departments just for residential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dariusz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-73956</link>
		<dc:creator>Dariusz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-73956</guid>
		<description>should designers not be bold then? This is nice.. I can see this concept came from folding. and it works for me..why can&#039;t small projects have big ideas anyways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should designers not be bold then? This is nice.. I can see this concept came from folding. and it works for me..why can&#8217;t small projects have big ideas anyways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proof200</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-73895</link>
		<dc:creator>proof200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-73895</guid>
		<description>Agreed. There seems to be a tendency these days in residential architecture to create buildings want to use the same design approach of large scale buildings on a much smaller scale... this seldom works and very frequently results in a project that has too much architectural &quot;noise&quot;. This building is ok but its trying too hard to be something its not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. There seems to be a tendency these days in residential architecture to create buildings want to use the same design approach of large scale buildings on a much smaller scale&#8230; this seldom works and very frequently results in a project that has too much architectural &#8220;noise&#8221;. This building is ok but its trying too hard to be something its not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architecture Feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89385</link>
		<dc:creator>Architecture Feeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89385</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects: 
Architects: John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects
Location: San... http://bit.ly/1EYCiy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects:<br />
Architects: John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects<br />
Location: San&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/1EYCiy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1EYCiy</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas foral</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89399</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas foral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89399</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects &#124; ArchDaily - http://shar.es/akckE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects | ArchDaily &#8211; <a href="http://shar.es/akckE" rel="nofollow">http://shar.es/akckE</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: archilocus</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-73777</link>
		<dc:creator>archilocus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-73777</guid>
		<description>Seems neat excepted for all the things they plugged in the ceiling.
Otherwise I&#039;m not fond of this kinf of overcomplicated architecture for a rather simple typology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems neat excepted for all the things they plugged in the ceiling.<br />
Otherwise I&#8217;m not fond of this kinf of overcomplicated architecture for a rather simple typology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaye Mendoza</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89404</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaye Mendoza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89404</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @nicholaspatten I&#039;d Live Here: King Residence. http://bit.ly/1HEMBe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @nicholaspatten I&#39;d Live Here: King Residence. <a href="http://bit.ly/1HEMBe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1HEMBe</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WPstudios</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89418</link>
		<dc:creator>WPstudios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89418</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @nicholaspatten I&#039;d Live Here: King Residence. http://bit.ly/1HEMBe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @nicholaspatten I&#39;d Live Here: King Residence. <a href="http://bit.ly/1HEMBe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1HEMBe</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Patten</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89428</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Patten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89428</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;I&#039;d Live Here: King Residence. http://bit.ly/1HEMBe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">I&#39;d Live Here: King Residence. <a href="http://bit.ly/1HEMBe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1HEMBe</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architecture+Molding</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89433</link>
		<dc:creator>Architecture+Molding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89433</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects: 
Architects: John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects Location.. http://bit.ly/2Wq6OQ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects:<br />
Architects: John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects Location.. <a href="http://bit.ly/2Wq6OQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2Wq6OQ</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bocetos Digitales</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/40011/king-residence-john-friedman-alice-kimm-architects/#comment-89440</link>
		<dc:creator>Bocetos Digitales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=40011#comment-89440</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects: 
Architects: John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects Location.. http://bit.ly/2Wq6OQ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">King Residence / John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects:<br />
Architects: John Friedman Alice Kimm Architects Location.. <a href="http://bit.ly/2Wq6OQ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2Wq6OQ</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-11 01:52:11 by W3 Total Cache -->
