<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kamyk Heritage Park / Tamizo Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sationbe</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-108846</link>
		<dc:creator>sationbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-108846</guid>
		<description>first doubts : what kind of HERITAGE? ( heritage of culture, tradition, regional architecture or heritage of heritage ) do you know the meaning of this word? do you think  that puting tatched rooftops it is enough to say that it is contemporary interpretation of polish heritage?
second doubts : why are you strighly coping from KWKpromes (small hotel building divides night zones into small private buildings like KWK&#039;s gathering place)
do you think people are blind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first doubts : what kind of HERITAGE? ( heritage of culture, tradition, regional architecture or heritage of heritage ) do you know the meaning of this word? do you think  that puting tatched rooftops it is enough to say that it is contemporary interpretation of polish heritage?<br />
second doubts : why are you strighly coping from KWKpromes (small hotel building divides night zones into small private buildings like KWK&#8217;s gathering place)<br />
do you think people are blind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristijonas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-84276</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristijonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-84276</guid>
		<description>impressive, pure and clear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>impressive, pure and clear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: three zed</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-75413</link>
		<dc:creator>three zed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-75413</guid>
		<description>well - no.

this is artlantis. 3d max is not the only rendering engine out there, you know.
if you still have doubts, go to 
http://www.artlantis.com/index.php?page=community/galerie/index&amp;aut=100183935

this project is in the gallery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well &#8211; no.</p>
<p>this is artlantis. 3d max is not the only rendering engine out there, you know.<br />
if you still have doubts, go to<br />
<a href="http://www.artlantis.com/index.php?page=community/galerie/index&#038;aut=100183935" rel="nofollow">http://www.artlantis.com/index.php?page=community/galerie/index&#038;aut=100183935</a></p>
<p>this project is in the gallery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little girl</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-73132</link>
		<dc:creator>Little girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-73132</guid>
		<description>How beautiful this project is!pure!Less is more,which I blieve from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How beautiful this project is!pure!Less is more,which I blieve from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sullka</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-72335</link>
		<dc:creator>sullka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-72335</guid>
		<description>I found out about these guys in Vray related forums when some of them were still students.

I really hope they start building those ideas, they sure produce beautiful architecture that shouldn&#039;t remain in renderings.

C&#039;mon potential clients, start hiring them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found out about these guys in Vray related forums when some of them were still students.</p>
<p>I really hope they start building those ideas, they sure produce beautiful architecture that shouldn&#8217;t remain in renderings.</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon potential clients, start hiring them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAKTI</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-72136</link>
		<dc:creator>SAKTI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-72136</guid>
		<description>cute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dekodex</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71785</link>
		<dc:creator>Dekodex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71785</guid>
		<description>even if I consider this images as skatches I have to ask about the toilets...ARE YOU CRAZY???? You know how to render now learn how to make buildings. Becouse there is functional nor spatial relationships, and construction is chubby as well. Concrete roof with wooden construction inside? But still, form is nice I must say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even if I consider this images as skatches I have to ask about the toilets&#8230;ARE YOU CRAZY???? You know how to render now learn how to make buildings. Becouse there is functional nor spatial relationships, and construction is chubby as well. Concrete roof with wooden construction inside? But still, form is nice I must say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71501</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71501</guid>
		<description>The pitched roofs look superb, but the white flat-roofed connections look clumsy: too heavy, too thick. There&#039;s little integration, little balance. It diminishes the elegance of the rest.

I think that the toilet array is naif. There&#039;s always a need for a common space in restaurant-wedding pavillions&#039; rest rooms - assisting children, grooming conversation, &quot;powdering-the-nose&quot; chit-chat, and the bride will usually need assistance with her dress... girls do go in groups to the rest rooms in Poland too, don&#039;t they? Besides, no accessible toilet for handicapped?

Moreover: where&#039;s the kitchen? In another building? Where will the other buildings in the vicinity be? Xenia is right: a site plan (at least) should be shown, because the relations between the buildings themselves, and the site, aren&#039;t clear (there&#039;s water, there&#039;s grass, there&#039;s a vehicle path... nothing else?). Besides, if the purity of the isolatedly displayed buildings is compromised by the presence of other elements not depicted, then there would be a flaw, and the display would be trying fool us into not showing it. Notice: I&#039;m not stating that this flaw exists; I just wish that there were a site plan, an aerial view or a common perspective that wouldn&#039;t make people suspect it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pitched roofs look superb, but the white flat-roofed connections look clumsy: too heavy, too thick. There&#8217;s little integration, little balance. It diminishes the elegance of the rest.</p>
<p>I think that the toilet array is naif. There&#8217;s always a need for a common space in restaurant-wedding pavillions&#8217; rest rooms &#8211; assisting children, grooming conversation, &#8220;powdering-the-nose&#8221; chit-chat, and the bride will usually need assistance with her dress&#8230; girls do go in groups to the rest rooms in Poland too, don&#8217;t they? Besides, no accessible toilet for handicapped?</p>
<p>Moreover: where&#8217;s the kitchen? In another building? Where will the other buildings in the vicinity be? Xenia is right: a site plan (at least) should be shown, because the relations between the buildings themselves, and the site, aren&#8217;t clear (there&#8217;s water, there&#8217;s grass, there&#8217;s a vehicle path&#8230; nothing else?). Besides, if the purity of the isolatedly displayed buildings is compromised by the presence of other elements not depicted, then there would be a flaw, and the display would be trying fool us into not showing it. Notice: I&#8217;m not stating that this flaw exists; I just wish that there were a site plan, an aerial view or a common perspective that wouldn&#8217;t make people suspect it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huyuk</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-87352</link>
		<dc:creator>huyuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-87352</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Kamyk Heritage Park / Tamizo Architects http://bit.ly/tuHW2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Kamyk Heritage Park / Tamizo Architects <a href="http://bit.ly/tuHW2" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/tuHW2</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brice</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-87353</link>
		<dc:creator>Brice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-87353</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Le juste milieu entre retro et contemporain, bref j&#039;aime! Kamyk Heritage Park / Tamizo Architects &#124; @ArchDaily http://bit.ly/3GOfov #archi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Le juste milieu entre retro et contemporain, bref j&#39;aime! Kamyk Heritage Park / Tamizo Architects | @ArchDaily <a href="http://bit.ly/3GOfov" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3GOfov</a> #archi</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodrigo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71424</link>
		<dc:creator>rodrigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71424</guid>
		<description>&quot;They still copying others&quot; and themselves - all the time the same projects and renderings - walls, columns rofs - but where is architecture, IDEA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They still copying others&#8221; and themselves &#8211; all the time the same projects and renderings &#8211; walls, columns rofs &#8211; but where is architecture, IDEA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoltan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71397</link>
		<dc:creator>zoltan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71397</guid>
		<description>To Goldschmidt R...

That IS a TT. Definitely.
I learned some architecture.
Arcitecture is nice and simple.
Presentation very beautiful.
What else do you need?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Goldschmidt R&#8230;</p>
<p>That IS a TT. Definitely.<br />
I learned some architecture.<br />
Arcitecture is nice and simple.<br />
Presentation very beautiful.<br />
What else do you need?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71279</link>
		<dc:creator>jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71279</guid>
		<description>bloody agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bloody agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john avlakiotis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71189</link>
		<dc:creator>john avlakiotis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71189</guid>
		<description>beautiful work! I love it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautiful work! I love it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xenia</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71099</link>
		<dc:creator>xenia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71099</guid>
		<description>where is the site plan?
dont understand the setting of the project...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where is the site plan?<br />
dont understand the setting of the project&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamizo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71097</link>
		<dc:creator>tamizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71097</guid>
		<description>why polish are still copying others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why polish are still copying others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-71028</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-71028</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s really beautiful.  the design team should be proud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s really beautiful.  the design team should be proud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Design Scene&#8217;s Link Time &#124; Fashion Design</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-70950</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Scene&#8217;s Link Time &#124; Fashion Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-70950</guid>
		<description>[...] Reality Show?*WOMEN blog &#8211; November 2009 German Vogue cover Katrin Thormann by Solve Sundsbo*ArchDaily &#8211; Kamyk Heritage Park by Tamizo Architects*Made in Brazil &#8211; I Guess I Would Also Get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reality Show?*WOMEN blog &#8211; November 2009 German Vogue cover Katrin Thormann by Solve Sundsbo*ArchDaily &#8211; Kamyk Heritage Park by Tamizo Architects*Made in Brazil &#8211; I Guess I Would Also Get [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldschmidt R</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-70868</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldschmidt R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-70868</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha. Gs you have to go home or you must wake up. What is this comment?
 And by the way, that is not TT. Christ go and learn at least some architecture!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha. Gs you have to go home or you must wake up. What is this comment?<br />
 And by the way, that is not TT. Christ go and learn at least some architecture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GS</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/39252/kamyk-heritage-park-tamizo-architects/#comment-70854</link>
		<dc:creator>GS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=39252#comment-70854</guid>
		<description>they forgot to include the Audi TT in the drawings...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they forgot to include the Audi TT in the drawings&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 16:28:41 by W3 Total Cache -->
