Visit our Products section to learn more about architectural products.

IFF Creative Center HQ / Konyk Architecture

By Karen Cilento — Filed under: Institutional Architecture , , , ,
 

floating lab_1

Konyk Architecture has created a renewed identity for the International Flavors and Fragrances Headquarters in New York.  To uplift the corporation’s appearance, Konyk proposed a new laboratory addition entitled “Floating Gardens.”  These gardens are composed of a series of overlapping roofs with a variety of flowering plants.

l06

The building appears to float above West 57th Street because the gardens begin on the 7th floor.  A garden at street-level public is planted with multi-hued flowers and plants. Rendered in chrome, the undersides of the floating laboratories mirror the floral patterns on the ground creating the illusion of a reflected garden in the sky.

garden lab_1

Inside the 200,000 sqft building, the main workspaces are comprised of a flexible modular office system. The system allows spaces to be configured into various sized conference rooms as well as personal offices optimized for all the different administrative and laboratory environments needed.


l


l03

l06


Title: IFF Creative Center HQ NYC

Location: West 57th Street, Manhattan NYC

Client: IFF

Area:  2,000m2

Design Architects: konyk  (www.konyk.net)

Principal in Charge: Craig Konyk

Project Manager:  Mary Ellen Devers

Project Team: E. Sean Bailey, David Iseri, Moniera Buck

Associate Architect/Planner:  Gruzen Samton LLC,  Susan Drew, Principal-in-Charge

MEP/Structural Engineering:  ARUP NYC

Laboratory Design: Samuel Anderson Architects

Project Cost/Construction Management:  F.J. Sciame

Year of Design:  2008.

 

13 comments »

TB says:

I love the design and how it actually does look like it’s floating in mid-air in between two other buildings. It’s almost like a modern interpretation of the hanging gardens.

I would love to see some more specific renders as to what materials would be used. From these images it looks like a bunch of glass and concrete thrown in a blender. I think this could be made more interesting. Especially with the architects looking for a natural theme and scenery…

 
# October 31, 2009 at 04:33
kamran says:

very nice.
go on

 
# October 31, 2009 at 04:34
Tosh says:

This will cost somebody loads of moneyz :) I mean, what is that cantilever??? Is it like 20m, 30m?

 
# October 31, 2009 at 08:16
    mach5beez says:

    someone showed me a 3d visual of the skywalk over the grandcanyon a few years back and i thought it was crazy, but not impossible. It takes a smart engineer to push the impossible. I like the concepts and i would love them to prove those who say it cant be done wrong.

     
    # November 1, 2009 at 21:58
Tosh says:

Btw, u will never be able to get the floor slab that thin in there :)

 
# October 31, 2009 at 08:17
hj says:

^hey an engineer!^

 
# October 31, 2009 at 13:07
lfm says:

lo interesante de este edificio es la originalidad de la propuesta, lamentablemente muchas buenas ideas solo se quedan en papel.

 
# October 31, 2009 at 15:01
philadio says:

Come on, really? Are they serious? I mean the idea of large cantilevers makes most of us giddy, but this is just plain and simple render physics – or lack there of. There is nothing wrong with masturbatory imagery per se, but this wouldn’t fly, literally and financially.

oh well.

 
# October 31, 2009 at 16:54
laar says:

More photos and plans would help. At the moment, it looks like a reverse podium which is rarely successful at the steet level.

 
# November 1, 2009 at 17:47
tray_p says:

Uhmmm 40′+ cantilever supported by a what a 2″ concrete slab?!#%$^@#&

 
# November 2, 2009 at 10:16
cannedplan says:

Hello? Arup is the engineer. I find it amusing how everyone here says what can and can’t be done re the cantilever. I wonder how many of you said “can’t be done” when CCTV was proposed.

 
# November 2, 2009 at 11:37
Dustin says:

you cant judge the structure of the project until you see a section of it. the fact that the cantilever finishes thin doesnt mean the whole structure is thin, maybe it is only reduced at the end where less structural strength is needed.

 
# November 2, 2009 at 14:15
philadio says:

Yeah, but those are cantilevers upon cantilevers – I don’t believe that things are impossible, but this is a little ridiculous! Arup can Arup-it-up if they want, but let’s see what really happens…Besides it falling down on someone.

 
# November 12, 2009 at 14:37

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

88 people died[+]
Great project. I love that depressed ground floor,...[+]
I think architects are getting more confused by the...[+]
this building is awsome![+]
very nice lighting inside[+]
I used the brick first[+]
very nice… agree whit the first comment…we...[+]
Agh..!! Didn’t like it AT ALL..!!...[+]
the problem with this is that...[+]
isn’t that what all...[+]
very beautiful. I would love to visit there...[+]
wow! all that wood, wow![+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »