“I recall the swiss architect Valerio Olgiati mentioning there are only two tipes of buildings: Contextual buildings and temples. Even thou i think he was refering to a landscape-pressence point of view, the fact that this project fails to achieve an identity make’s it very relevant. Somehow when a public structure with religious icons is reused in a concert hall or a discoteque, it remains a public gathering place for a commuity. If it losses the icons, certanly the structure can become anything. But this project is neither as simple as a “reused structure” (because it keeps the icons) neither a gathering place.”

Certanly the project wants to comunicate something but it dosn’t know what. Like teenagers.

- keeping the benches as dinig chairs
- chandeliers at bathrooms (specially the one chosen, eth rest of the bathroom is pretty nice)
- plastering all the back wall but the arch, cross and side doors.
- Some “gothic meets modern” features I don’t like, etc

All interior design issues (a purely personal view, others surely think different)

But based stricly in formal, abstract, relative, mundane or even banal points.

Not because of “profanity” or “insensitive” decisions.