<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House in Gohara / Suppose Design Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenchiku</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-263891</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenchiku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-263891</guid>
		<description>There is a lot to be said of the &#039;honesty&#039; within traditional Japanese architecture - this example is not one of them. As usual with most things Japanese, the idea is lost in the perverse separation of reality and ideology. Concrete can be a beautiful material to use, if designed, detailed, poured and finished correctly - and it does speak of many historic qualities of Japanese architecture (see, wabi-sabi, shibui, mono-no-aware etc.). think of it as liquid stone, without the time required to make it as such - stone. However, its the innate nature of contemporary Japanese architects who derive much of their enthusiasm from the &#039;different&#039; for &#039;difference sake&#039;, which is rather pointless, there is no reference to begin to understand of question the design and building on. and yes, the practicality of &#039;living&#039; in the space will be uncomfortable (taking a crap in full view of all occupants and passerby&#039;s ...) to say the least. It appears that most well-grounded, enthusiastic and inventive examples of Japanese architecture occur in the built-up cities of Tokyo, Osaka or Kobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot to be said of the &#8216;honesty&#8217; within traditional Japanese architecture &#8211; this example is not one of them. As usual with most things Japanese, the idea is lost in the perverse separation of reality and ideology. Concrete can be a beautiful material to use, if designed, detailed, poured and finished correctly &#8211; and it does speak of many historic qualities of Japanese architecture (see, wabi-sabi, shibui, mono-no-aware etc.). think of it as liquid stone, without the time required to make it as such &#8211; stone. However, its the innate nature of contemporary Japanese architects who derive much of their enthusiasm from the &#8216;different&#8217; for &#8216;difference sake&#8217;, which is rather pointless, there is no reference to begin to understand of question the design and building on. and yes, the practicality of &#8216;living&#8217; in the space will be uncomfortable (taking a crap in full view of all occupants and passerby&#8217;s &#8230;) to say the least. It appears that most well-grounded, enthusiastic and inventive examples of Japanese architecture occur in the built-up cities of Tokyo, Osaka or Kobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leyarose</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-220226</link>
		<dc:creator>Leyarose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-220226</guid>
		<description>what is the external cladding used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the external cladding used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JitM</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-219941</link>
		<dc:creator>JitM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-219941</guid>
		<description>oops sorry ... not ordos villa, I meant the Osler House (Brazil).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops sorry &#8230; not ordos villa, I meant the Osler House (Brazil).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JitM</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-219905</link>
		<dc:creator>JitM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-219905</guid>
		<description>there are some who get very disturbed/ agitated when others do some very reasonable criticism about the cliched bare-concrete-with-puncture-marks look and the bare-cold-impersonal -- and in some cases downright gloomy and morose -- look and feel of many houses that have come to characterize what goes by the name of &quot;Japanese Architecture&quot; nowadays. and they talk of &quot;different culture&quot; and &quot;Jap aesthetics&quot;, and &quot;the Japanese mind&quot; and what not. I wish people had not bluffed themselves so much. 
for example, see the Fisher&#039;s Island House by Thomas Phifer (New York). same kind of minimalism, even the same kind of transparency and openness -- with actually more glass then this house. same simplicity and unclutterred look. but completely different feel. you feel light and cheery. you feel &quot;spring&quot; instead of &quot;winter&quot;. you feel &quot;tranquility&quot; instead of &quot;silent gloom&quot;. for other examples of what minimalism and simplicity can and should be, compare the Ordos Villa with the Plus House (same basic concept), or even the traditional Jap timber-and-bamboo houses before this bunch of modern Jap architects came along. 
who has ever proved that &quot;simple&quot; is the same as &quot;bland&quot;? that there is the opposite of &quot;gaudiness&quot; or &quot;tackiness&quot; has to be &quot;cold&quot; and &quot;morose&quot; but cannot be a golden mean in between? are these architects doing justice to even the traditional Japanese way of living and sense of beauty? a big NO, if &quot;Japanese Architecture&quot; has to mean building bare blue-gray concrete boxes or metal boxes -- sometimes with non-right angles and skewed edges, and no demarkation between a living room and a bathroom. sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are some who get very disturbed/ agitated when others do some very reasonable criticism about the cliched bare-concrete-with-puncture-marks look and the bare-cold-impersonal &#8212; and in some cases downright gloomy and morose &#8212; look and feel of many houses that have come to characterize what goes by the name of &#8220;Japanese Architecture&#8221; nowadays. and they talk of &#8220;different culture&#8221; and &#8220;Jap aesthetics&#8221;, and &#8220;the Japanese mind&#8221; and what not. I wish people had not bluffed themselves so much.<br />
for example, see the Fisher&#8217;s Island House by Thomas Phifer (New York). same kind of minimalism, even the same kind of transparency and openness &#8212; with actually more glass then this house. same simplicity and unclutterred look. but completely different feel. you feel light and cheery. you feel &#8220;spring&#8221; instead of &#8220;winter&#8221;. you feel &#8220;tranquility&#8221; instead of &#8220;silent gloom&#8221;. for other examples of what minimalism and simplicity can and should be, compare the Ordos Villa with the Plus House (same basic concept), or even the traditional Jap timber-and-bamboo houses before this bunch of modern Jap architects came along.<br />
who has ever proved that &#8220;simple&#8221; is the same as &#8220;bland&#8221;? that there is the opposite of &#8220;gaudiness&#8221; or &#8220;tackiness&#8221; has to be &#8220;cold&#8221; and &#8220;morose&#8221; but cannot be a golden mean in between? are these architects doing justice to even the traditional Japanese way of living and sense of beauty? a big NO, if &#8220;Japanese Architecture&#8221; has to mean building bare blue-gray concrete boxes or metal boxes &#8212; sometimes with non-right angles and skewed edges, and no demarkation between a living room and a bathroom. sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remark</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-217746</link>
		<dc:creator>remark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-217746</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot missing compositionally, fenomenologically. The garage story needs some support-point or weight. And the living story seems too elementary, too. 

But if this is for japanese, then who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot missing compositionally, fenomenologically. The garage story needs some support-point or weight. And the living story seems too elementary, too. </p>
<p>But if this is for japanese, then who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gani zakaria</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-217642</link>
		<dc:creator>gani zakaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-217642</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;House in Gohara / Suppose Design Office &#124; ArchDaily http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">House in Gohara / Suppose Design Office | ArchDaily <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georgesmyrlis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-201836</link>
		<dc:creator>georgesmyrlis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-201836</guid>
		<description>what if you are not nudist and you want to visit?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if you are not nudist and you want to visit?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kian</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-110838</link>
		<dc:creator>kian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-110838</guid>
		<description>Anyone got any info on this building besides the whats on arch daily??

Cant seem to find anything anywhere!!! i am studying this building in college at the moment... emailed suppose office designs and they never got back to me :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone got any info on this building besides the whats on arch daily??</p>
<p>Cant seem to find anything anywhere!!! i am studying this building in college at the moment&#8230; emailed suppose office designs and they never got back to me :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunia Tomoum</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-76616</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunia Tomoum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-76616</guid>
		<description>the building is offset from the road… there is kind of bridge in the architecture connecting the road to the roof… that’s why u find windows on the the side of the road too.

see:
- Go01 image ( look on the very left)
- on the second floor plan, u’ll find the extended platform on plan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the building is offset from the road… there is kind of bridge in the architecture connecting the road to the roof… that’s why u find windows on the the side of the road too.</p>
<p>see:<br />
- Go01 image ( look on the very left)<br />
- on the second floor plan, u’ll find the extended platform on plan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-74063</link>
		<dc:creator>P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-74063</guid>
		<description>energy waste, no privacy, Space one two and three are one visually, Too silhouette for...no nice view, more expensive construction, stones in the garage are beautiful in the photo, but I can^t see a woman walking with stylus shoes on them, 	
I think the majority of houses are currently undertaking to see from outside, as these monstrous women operated with botox, but no to living in. sorry for my comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>energy waste, no privacy, Space one two and three are one visually, Too silhouette for&#8230;no nice view, more expensive construction, stones in the garage are beautiful in the photo, but I can^t see a woman walking with stylus shoes on them,<br />
I think the majority of houses are currently undertaking to see from outside, as these monstrous women operated with botox, but no to living in. sorry for my comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiterock</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-72560</link>
		<dc:creator>whiterock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-72560</guid>
		<description>很喜欢建筑带来的这种宁静的感觉！！！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>很喜欢建筑带来的这种宁静的感觉！！！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-70081</link>
		<dc:creator>arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-70081</guid>
		<description>very ascetic, cold and conceptual house; maybe too much for the Europeans eyes. But for Japanese it&#039;s - O.K. In some case, it&#039;s like architectural haiku.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very ascetic, cold and conceptual house; maybe too much for the Europeans eyes. But for Japanese it&#8217;s &#8211; O.K. In some case, it&#8217;s like architectural haiku.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-70078</link>
		<dc:creator>arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-70078</guid>
		<description>this house is joy for neighbors :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this house is joy for neighbors :-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papanoa</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-69811</link>
		<dc:creator>papanoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-69811</guid>
		<description>cool design. one have certainly to adapt the daily life to such sculptural designs - would be worth it for me. but i see a lot of potential termic problems. what about the climate-chenge?? projects not reflecting those problems are outdated, i`m afraid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool design. one have certainly to adapt the daily life to such sculptural designs &#8211; would be worth it for me. but i see a lot of potential termic problems. what about the climate-chenge?? projects not reflecting those problems are outdated, i`m afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunia Tomoum</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-69747</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunia Tomoum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-69747</guid>
		<description>to anavic,
the building is offset from the road... there is kind of bridge in the architecture connecting the road to the roof... that&#039;s why u find windows on the the side of the road too. 

see: 
- Go01 image ( look on the very left)
- on the second floor plan, u&#039;ll find the extended platform on plan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to anavic,<br />
the building is offset from the road&#8230; there is kind of bridge in the architecture connecting the road to the roof&#8230; that&#8217;s why u find windows on the the side of the road too. </p>
<p>see:<br />
- Go01 image ( look on the very left)<br />
- on the second floor plan, u&#8217;ll find the extended platform on plan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w11kirschner</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-89758</link>
		<dc:creator>w11kirschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-89758</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;immer wieder geil: Suppose Design Office http://bit.ly/msuOa #Architektur&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">immer wieder geil: Suppose Design Office <a href="http://bit.ly/msuOa" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/msuOa</a> #Architektur</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luscious Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-89771</link>
		<dc:creator>Luscious Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-89771</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: House in Gohara / Suppose Design Office http://bit.ly/27UaD6 #architecture #design&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: House in Gohara / Suppose Design Office <a href="http://bit.ly/27UaD6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/27UaD6</a> #architecture #design</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-69568</link>
		<dc:creator>M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-69568</guid>
		<description>Ah, que bacana! Seja bemvindo!
When I saw teh 1st pic, I thought the wiew should be ugly or something. That happens a lot in japanese architecture, to hide from the external landscape of crowded urban towns. But nope: here the site is rather nice. Go figure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, que bacana! Seja bemvindo!<br />
When I saw teh 1st pic, I thought the wiew should be ugly or something. That happens a lot in japanese architecture, to hide from the external landscape of crowded urban towns. But nope: here the site is rather nice. Go figure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodrigobocater</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-69504</link>
		<dc:creator>rodrigobocater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-69504</guid>
		<description>eu realmente não entendo as conformações dos espaços internos orientais. admiro muito, mas diversas vezes chega a ser curioso o porque em decisões como essa nesse projeto! 

vi seu blog! braileira/francesa! otimo! gostei dos textos =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eu realmente não entendo as conformações dos espaços internos orientais. admiro muito, mas diversas vezes chega a ser curioso o porque em decisões como essa nesse projeto! </p>
<p>vi seu blog! braileira/francesa! otimo! gostei dos textos =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john avlakiotis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/38791/house-in-gohara-suppose-design-office/#comment-69452</link>
		<dc:creator>john avlakiotis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=38791#comment-69452</guid>
		<description>Real good work! I wish there were more photos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real good work! I wish there were more photos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 16:33:48 by W3 Total Cache -->
