<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post Parametric 1: Data, a debate in Columbia University</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/36260/post-parametric-1-data-a-debate-in-columbia-university/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36260/post-parametric-1-data-a-debate-in-columbia-university/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36260/post-parametric-1-data-a-debate-in-columbia-university/#comment-370888</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36260#comment-370888</guid>
		<description>I am a free thinking individual with rational capacity to make decisions, and I even find fun in this process. Why do we seem to need to subordinate our responsibilities as designers to an external force that doesn&#039;t think so much as it computes? I like the sentiment very much of pairing parametrics with empiricism but I am terrified by the systemic risk involved.
especially when you ask &#039;why?&#039; to the average/nearly all Libskind/Hadid delusionist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a free thinking individual with rational capacity to make decisions, and I even find fun in this process. Why do we seem to need to subordinate our responsibilities as designers to an external force that doesn&#8217;t think so much as it computes? I like the sentiment very much of pairing parametrics with empiricism but I am terrified by the systemic risk involved.<br />
especially when you ask &#8216;why?&#8217; to the average/nearly all Libskind/Hadid delusionist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36260/post-parametric-1-data-a-debate-in-columbia-university/#comment-61140</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36260#comment-61140</guid>
		<description>Is there a recording of the debate or anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a recording of the debate or anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar falcón lara</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36260/post-parametric-1-data-a-debate-in-columbia-university/#comment-61020</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar falcón lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36260#comment-61020</guid>
		<description>This is so cool. We need this sort of tool to be widespread, not only in the hands of the &quot;Architectural and Development Elite&quot; but everyone involved in architecture and design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so cool. We need this sort of tool to be widespread, not only in the hands of the &#8220;Architectural and Development Elite&#8221; but everyone involved in architecture and design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Medina</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36260/post-parametric-1-data-a-debate-in-columbia-university/#comment-173406</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Medina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36260#comment-173406</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Reading: &quot;Post Parametric 1: Data, a debate in Columbia University &#124; ArchDaily&quot; (http://twitthis.com/8c9qci)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Reading: &quot;Post Parametric 1: Data, a debate in Columbia University | ArchDaily&quot; (<a href="http://twitthis.com/8c9qci" rel="nofollow">http://twitthis.com/8c9qci</a>)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Patten</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36260/post-parametric-1-data-a-debate-in-columbia-university/#comment-90571</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Patten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36260#comment-90571</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Post Parametric 1: Data, a debate in Columbia University. http://bit.ly/xTvOR&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Post Parametric 1: Data, a debate in Columbia University. <a href="http://bit.ly/xTvOR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/xTvOR</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 21:31:51 by W3 Total Cache -->
