<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolver / Alice Studio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luiz Dumont</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-158299</link>
		<dc:creator>Luiz Dumont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 21:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-158299</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Reading: &quot;Evolver / Alice Studio &#124; ArchDaily&quot;( http://twitthis.com/p4k4c3 )&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Reading: &quot;Evolver / Alice Studio | ArchDaily&quot;( <a href="http://twitthis.com/p4k4c3" rel="nofollow">http://twitthis.com/p4k4c3</a> )</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-137133</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-137133</guid>
		<description>nice, sam! BURN IT!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice, sam! BURN IT!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hackea Tu Vida &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evolver (Suiza)</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-74550</link>
		<dc:creator>Hackea Tu Vida &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Evolver (Suiza)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-74550</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolver (Suiza) &#171; PoderesUnidos:ARCHIVO</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-73942</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolver (Suiza) &#171; PoderesUnidos:ARCHIVO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-73942</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bu.*</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-66718</link>
		<dc:creator>Bu.*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-66718</guid>
		<description>Seems to me like the nature doesn&#039;t need this thing to be there, and the structure&#039;s purpose wasn&#039;t to provide a better view into nature at all, no matter how good the description make it sound...its all just pretty words.... Kinda egotistic in my opinion....like its trying to manipulate nature...or take away its spotlight....And lastly, red does NOT somehow make this thing more &#039;fashionable&#039;...lolz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me like the nature doesn&#8217;t need this thing to be there, and the structure&#8217;s purpose wasn&#8217;t to provide a better view into nature at all, no matter how good the description make it sound&#8230;its all just pretty words&#8230;. Kinda egotistic in my opinion&#8230;.like its trying to manipulate nature&#8230;or take away its spotlight&#8230;.And lastly, red does NOT somehow make this thing more &#8216;fashionable&#8217;&#8230;lolz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archlad</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-65369</link>
		<dc:creator>Archlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-65369</guid>
		<description>Found this good video about the project, worth a look
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3MNDyxSews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found this good video about the project, worth a look<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3MNDyxSews" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3MNDyxSews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Linn</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-64514</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Linn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-64514</guid>
		<description>SPIRAL of goodness &amp; wooden DESIGN complexity! This CREATION makes you want to hang out -- and IN.

From Page: &quot;Evolver is an architectural artefact intervening on the panorama surrounding Zermatt. It was designed and executed by a team of 2nd year students from the ALICE Studio at Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland. In an effort to take full advantage of the site&#039;s extensive and astounding views, the project sits strategically next to the lake Stelli at an altitude of 2,536 m (8,320 feet).

Evolver&#039;s structure mainly consists of a succession of 24 rotating frames supporting an enclosed space that visitors are encouraged to enter. As he or she progresses through the space, a concealed but uninterrupted 720° movement is unraveling along a transformed panorama.

This transformation occurs while inside a person is moving along a selective string of openings only to be caught peeling off a sequence of unexpected views from the original landscape.

Wobbling below and above a distant horizon, ground and sky have been reorchestrated into an orbiting panorama by a journey that has already culminated to where it started: A loophole on the skyline.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPIRAL of goodness &amp; wooden DESIGN complexity! This CREATION makes you want to hang out &#8212; and IN.</p>
<p>From Page: &#8220;Evolver is an architectural artefact intervening on the panorama surrounding Zermatt. It was designed and executed by a team of 2nd year students from the ALICE Studio at Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland. In an effort to take full advantage of the site&#8217;s extensive and astounding views, the project sits strategically next to the lake Stelli at an altitude of 2,536 m (8,320 feet).</p>
<p>Evolver&#8217;s structure mainly consists of a succession of 24 rotating frames supporting an enclosed space that visitors are encouraged to enter. As he or she progresses through the space, a concealed but uninterrupted 720° movement is unraveling along a transformed panorama.</p>
<p>This transformation occurs while inside a person is moving along a selective string of openings only to be caught peeling off a sequence of unexpected views from the original landscape.</p>
<p>Wobbling below and above a distant horizon, ground and sky have been reorchestrated into an orbiting panorama by a journey that has already culminated to where it started: A loophole on the skyline.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-63978</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-63978</guid>
		<description>aiie... I don&#039;t understand why people is so negative. Those mountains are going to stay there for long long time you know, so where is the probleme with experiencing something there just for a few month? The landscape is spoiled? then please, if you&#039;re not able to enjoy it for the time it&#039;s there, wait till it&#039;s going to be like it has allways been, untuched. That&#039;s why this structure isn&#039;t permanent, nature is beautifull in it self but why shouldn&#039;t we deal with it? At least try. This &quot;object&quot; is not necessary for sure but what an experience!
Maybe we have to be more open minded and let students understand what they&#039;re doing without beeing so negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aiie&#8230; I don&#8217;t understand why people is so negative. Those mountains are going to stay there for long long time you know, so where is the probleme with experiencing something there just for a few month? The landscape is spoiled? then please, if you&#8217;re not able to enjoy it for the time it&#8217;s there, wait till it&#8217;s going to be like it has allways been, untuched. That&#8217;s why this structure isn&#8217;t permanent, nature is beautifull in it self but why shouldn&#8217;t we deal with it? At least try. This &#8220;object&#8221; is not necessary for sure but what an experience!<br />
Maybe we have to be more open minded and let students understand what they&#8217;re doing without beeing so negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entrée Alpine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; EVOLVER_links</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-63160</link>
		<dc:creator>Entrée Alpine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; EVOLVER_links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-63160</guid>
		<description>[...] www.archdaily.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.archdaily.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ronaldson</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-63093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ronaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-63093</guid>
		<description>gee miss pointless, relax would you. Even if you don&#039;t think the building is fitting for the landscape, don&#039;t you think it&#039;s at least a good exercise in spatial design? And construction and structural design for that matter? For a 2nd yr class, i think it&#039;s a great exercise, and as they progress through their degree they will appreciate more and more the importance of integration with the landscape. Negativity gets you nowhere, so chillax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gee miss pointless, relax would you. Even if you don&#8217;t think the building is fitting for the landscape, don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s at least a good exercise in spatial design? And construction and structural design for that matter? For a 2nd yr class, i think it&#8217;s a great exercise, and as they progress through their degree they will appreciate more and more the importance of integration with the landscape. Negativity gets you nowhere, so chillax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lili so pointless</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-63017</link>
		<dc:creator>lili so pointless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-63017</guid>
		<description>adrian, i hope you dont believe everything you say here, because you might have been brainwashed!!!

please tell me you&#039;ll take that dog dirt off this place?

you&#039;re very contradictory... you think you&#039;ll appreciate the nature with that, you say that the pictures are bad (why??? because IT S BAD, it doesn&#039;t mean nothing exept pointless preocupations) it is not even an experiment, ...
how much did it cost all togheter (paying the students, helicopter, furniture...) and where did you get the money for?
is that the new epfl style nowadays?

maybe it s sculpural but a 1:10 model would have been enough, you dont revolutionate nothing at all

if this are our new architects, aiiiie, but im sure you like it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adrian, i hope you dont believe everything you say here, because you might have been brainwashed!!!</p>
<p>please tell me you&#8217;ll take that dog dirt off this place?</p>
<p>you&#8217;re very contradictory&#8230; you think you&#8217;ll appreciate the nature with that, you say that the pictures are bad (why??? because IT S BAD, it doesn&#8217;t mean nothing exept pointless preocupations) it is not even an experiment, &#8230;<br />
how much did it cost all togheter (paying the students, helicopter, furniture&#8230;) and where did you get the money for?<br />
is that the new epfl style nowadays?</p>
<p>maybe it s sculpural but a 1:10 model would have been enough, you dont revolutionate nothing at all</p>
<p>if this are our new architects, aiiiie, but im sure you like it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-62875</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-62875</guid>
		<description>EVOLVER the movie -&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3MNDyxSews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVOLVER the movie -&gt;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3MNDyxSews" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3MNDyxSews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kkkk</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-62609</link>
		<dc:creator>kkkk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-62609</guid>
		<description>the answer shows the problem!!! youre so superficial, more emblematik hahah, bkoz the structure has no purpose hoooo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the answer shows the problem!!! youre so superficial, more emblematik hahah, bkoz the structure has no purpose hoooo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-61782</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-61782</guid>
		<description>At least it isn&#039;t boring. More than what can be said for most firms&#039; work. true, it&#039;s not necessary, but saying such experiments are pointless is misguided. I&#039;m sure the mountains will outlast it, so it hasn&#039;t spoiled anything. Some more discussion here: http://bit.ly/3qM3Fe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it isn&#8217;t boring. More than what can be said for most firms&#8217; work. true, it&#8217;s not necessary, but saying such experiments are pointless is misguided. I&#8217;m sure the mountains will outlast it, so it hasn&#8217;t spoiled anything. Some more discussion here: <a href="http://bit.ly/3qM3Fe" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3qM3Fe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Linn</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-158300</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Linn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-158300</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: Evolver / Alice Studio http://bit.ly/4rXcXv&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: Evolver / Alice Studio <a href="http://bit.ly/4rXcXv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4rXcXv</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ronaldson</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-61295</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ronaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-61295</guid>
		<description>Yes. May i ask what you are implying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. May i ask what you are implying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Lagarrigue</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-61285</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Lagarrigue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-61285</guid>
		<description>Have you built anything, dear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you built anything, dear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ronaldson</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-61001</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ronaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-61001</guid>
		<description>I doubt it&#039;s a virgin landscape. If you think of people who have traveled through the mountains, camped there for weeks at a time, perhaps nomads at one stage in time, then it&#039;s certainly not untouched. There are lots of projects out there located in similar settings and they work, like Zumthor&#039;s Therme Vals (not that i&#039;m comparing the two). I for one think it&#039;s a great project, especially for 2nd year architects. Would love to wake up to that view :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it&#8217;s a virgin landscape. If you think of people who have traveled through the mountains, camped there for weeks at a time, perhaps nomads at one stage in time, then it&#8217;s certainly not untouched. There are lots of projects out there located in similar settings and they work, like Zumthor&#8217;s Therme Vals (not that i&#8217;m comparing the two). I for one think it&#8217;s a great project, especially for 2nd year architects. Would love to wake up to that view :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLoyd</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-60993</link>
		<dc:creator>LLoyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-60993</guid>
		<description>I wrote my thesis on &quot;An Architectural Response to the Sublime&quot;. This project confirms my opening statement that architects are known to design impulsively. We either try to make a loud statement and ignore the context or hide our building away.

View seems to be the only concern but that shows the building can have little meaning beyond that function. Looking at trace concepts of the sites past can reveal really cool elements to drive a design. Geoology, History, Environmental, archeological, scientific..all explore the particulars of THAT place. The result can be a design that personally responds to the site and has greater meaning. It worked for me! 

Understand the context as well, its as much a mental manifestation as it is a physical one. Our perception is one of awe, a vastness of landscape with a canvas of simple contrasts in forms, materials and colours. The architect should understand that, ignoring the context is dangerous and leads to a pointless and odd looking insertion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote my thesis on &#8220;An Architectural Response to the Sublime&#8221;. This project confirms my opening statement that architects are known to design impulsively. We either try to make a loud statement and ignore the context or hide our building away.</p>
<p>View seems to be the only concern but that shows the building can have little meaning beyond that function. Looking at trace concepts of the sites past can reveal really cool elements to drive a design. Geoology, History, Environmental, archeological, scientific..all explore the particulars of THAT place. The result can be a design that personally responds to the site and has greater meaning. It worked for me! </p>
<p>Understand the context as well, its as much a mental manifestation as it is a physical one. Our perception is one of awe, a vastness of landscape with a canvas of simple contrasts in forms, materials and colours. The architect should understand that, ignoring the context is dangerous and leads to a pointless and odd looking insertion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolver: the viewing experience &#171; MAAWORKS</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/36054/evolver-alice-studio/#comment-60850</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolver: the viewing experience &#171; MAAWORKS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=36054#comment-60850</guid>
		<description>[...] Evolver on Archdaily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Evolver on Archdaily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 10:08:50 by W3 Total Cache -->
