Comments on: Songzhuang Artist Residence / DnA

By: Mark Pol

Mark Pol — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:13:31 +0000

L.S.,

What are the possibilities to exhibit in your district?

Thanx

Kind regards,

Mark Pol
The Netherlands

By: patynovoa

patynovoa — Sun, 09 Jan 2011 02:33:39 +0000

Songzhuang Artist Residence / DnA | ArchDaily http://t.co/dxTMXHV via @archdaily

By: Madison Grinnell

Madison Grinnell — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:49:48 +0000

Songzhuang Artist Residence / DnA | ArchDaily http://bit.ly/clEVci

By: Cibele Machado

Cibele Machado — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:31:31 +0000

tá aí, curti: http://www.archdaily.com/35696/songzhuang-artist-residence-dna/?f=selected

By: Gihong KIM

Gihong KIM — Sun, 16 May 2010 04:02:26 +0000

http://twitthis.com/p2csct 꼭 이렇지만은 않지만 이런 느낌이 저층형 집합주택일까나.. ㅋ

By: Y

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:12:28 +0000

Moshe Safdie

By: E

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:59:24 +0000

really wanting some interior shots to understand the project better.

By: Mark V

Mark V — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:17:49 +0000

I feel that a “blank canvas” approach is a very noble first impression, and give artists the opportunity to create without influence of another’s creation. I think though, giving a “blank canvas” forces itself upon artists in the same means given that not all artists choose to produce upon blank canvas, many artists work within existing spaces/residual objects/etc. thus contextualizing their art to some existing specificity. So when the text speaks about it referencing a prior dwelling place of the artist-residences, I think we can be somewhat confident that the artists are receiving something related to their prior decisions of a place to create in.

By: RT

RT — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:24:22 +0000

jeez…not another architecture with stacking blocks and the spatial divisions are just a mess.

By: ghayssa

ghayssa — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:49:27 +0000

it s a better i like this concept

By: MS

MS — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:08:49 +0000

i find it truly uninteresting and chaotic. It´s a tentative of doing something great but the result is an immature architectural project. There´s no real concept behind this….

By: hbchbc

hbchbc — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:20:31 +0000

I have the same feeling at first glance.

By: chenhui

chenhui — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:49:12 +0000

柱子很乱，感觉是为造型而造型

By: Art And Architecture For Creative China Community

Art And Architecture For Creative China Community — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:46:35 +0000

[...] stacked to create small nooks and voids that scatter light and thin the structural volume. [via archdaily, pics by savoye and iwan [...]

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:03:47 +0000

I’m not quite sure how anyone can comment on the appropriateness of the spaces created by this project without a single interior image…the outside sure is nice, and the circulation areas created by the spaces between building volumes is fantastic…

But you can’t necessarily compare the buildings exterior to the work/live spaces within…

Interiors please, then we’ll comment on how well the form of the building compliments an artists lifestyle

By: SabrinaArtLab

SabrinaArtLab — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:45:29 +0000

Songzhuang Artist Residence: Located in TongZhou, outskirts of Beijing http://bit.ly/csiCc

By: irishclover

irishclover — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:39:54 +0000

oh… i’m not so sure.
all their projects are a little too fluffy and untutored and too similar to the usual suspects.
look at the windows in this project for instance.
and their drawings in their site. what is their real soul (if any?)

By: ray

ray — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:52:47 +0000

HAHAHA!! MICKEY MAO – S*up*D name!

By: Mickey Mao

Mickey Mao — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:46:30 +0000

you think this is copy-architecture??

I know that copy-architecture is an issue with some firms in China, but not with this firm. DNA’s projects are genuine and creative works of architecture. check out their website, some good stuff in there.

By: ray

ray — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:40:45 +0000

it’s Habitat 67. but this project creates another quality of -ve space.