<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sag Harbor House / Jendretzki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60902</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60902</guid>
		<description>Pablo, it&#039;s very nice, but U must show the place around the house to see how this style fits into the place. Very cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo, it&#8217;s very nice, but U must show the place around the house to see how this style fits into the place. Very cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60541</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60541</guid>
		<description>I would agree.  Comments posted that denigrate the house tend to be &quot;glass-is-half-full&#039; views, detracting points for not outright modernism. Others (the glass-half-full variants), praise the house for what the designer did bring to what could have been a completely banal residence.

I could appreciate a well designed house in a thoroughly traditional style - and can also appreciate the more typical fare on this website.  I think the &quot;polished turd&quot; criticism from above results from the fact that this is obviously a hybrid design, which fools noone into thinking it is modernism, and probably offends its more traditional neighbors for what novel details it does have.  There is some merit to sticking in a style and perfecting your design, rather than attempt a kind of blending.

Overall though, I think its a solid effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree.  Comments posted that denigrate the house tend to be &#8220;glass-is-half-full&#8217; views, detracting points for not outright modernism. Others (the glass-half-full variants), praise the house for what the designer did bring to what could have been a completely banal residence.</p>
<p>I could appreciate a well designed house in a thoroughly traditional style &#8211; and can also appreciate the more typical fare on this website.  I think the &#8220;polished turd&#8221; criticism from above results from the fact that this is obviously a hybrid design, which fools noone into thinking it is modernism, and probably offends its more traditional neighbors for what novel details it does have.  There is some merit to sticking in a style and perfecting your design, rather than attempt a kind of blending.</p>
<p>Overall though, I think its a solid effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMS</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60362</link>
		<dc:creator>AMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60362</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I don&#039;t think its that bad... Its nothing groundbreaking but the detailing is a superb use of mundane materials and I&#039;m glad to see it.  It takes a talented designer to do so much with so little, even if the result isn&#039;t a white box with one end open, on top of a brown box with an off-center window, like half of the projects on here.

I&#039;m always for trying something new, but this is about doing good design for the &quot;unenlightened&quot; instead of staying on our high horses and letting garbage architects design for that majority of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I don&#8217;t think its that bad&#8230; Its nothing groundbreaking but the detailing is a superb use of mundane materials and I&#8217;m glad to see it.  It takes a talented designer to do so much with so little, even if the result isn&#8217;t a white box with one end open, on top of a brown box with an off-center window, like half of the projects on here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always for trying something new, but this is about doing good design for the &#8220;unenlightened&#8221; instead of staying on our high horses and letting garbage architects design for that majority of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar falcón lara</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60320</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar falcón lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60320</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a nice house, sure. Who lies here, someone very calm I guess. The use of wood is very thoughtful albeit normal, I like the wall finish on the chimney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice house, sure. Who lies here, someone very calm I guess. The use of wood is very thoughtful albeit normal, I like the wall finish on the chimney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sep</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60295</link>
		<dc:creator>Sep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60295</guid>
		<description>Actually, quite a sensitive work of details in the wood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, quite a sensitive work of details in the wood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60247</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60247</guid>
		<description>&quot;you can if you freeze it&quot; Stanley Kubrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;you can if you freeze it&#8221; Stanley Kubrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60246</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised by the comments.  I&#039;m relieved there are other defenders.  The house, if somewhat polite, has a simple elegance to the features and the small touches (mirrored light fixtures, round window) bring some wanted eye-candy.  You should go to the designer&#039;s website to see more of the landscaping as this is strongest point of the work.  It&#039;s good to see this level of design brought brough in on a limited budget.  That said, I agree some of the elements failed: fireplace scale is tough to gauge from the pictures and the gable window is a missed opportunity.  I&#039;m afraid the blocky stud pockets at the gable window are a compromise to costs.

  Some &quot;before&quot; pictures of the remodel would be an asset to our discussion here.  There are a couple available on the architects website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised by the comments.  I&#8217;m relieved there are other defenders.  The house, if somewhat polite, has a simple elegance to the features and the small touches (mirrored light fixtures, round window) bring some wanted eye-candy.  You should go to the designer&#8217;s website to see more of the landscaping as this is strongest point of the work.  It&#8217;s good to see this level of design brought brough in on a limited budget.  That said, I agree some of the elements failed: fireplace scale is tough to gauge from the pictures and the gable window is a missed opportunity.  I&#8217;m afraid the blocky stud pockets at the gable window are a compromise to costs.</p>
<p>  Some &#8220;before&#8221; pictures of the remodel would be an asset to our discussion here.  There are a couple available on the architects website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sag Harbor House by Jendretzki - House Design ,Architecture, and Interior Design on Studio House Design</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60112</link>
		<dc:creator>Sag Harbor House by Jendretzki - House Design ,Architecture, and Interior Design on Studio House Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60112</guid>
		<description>[...] wood work such as decks, pergolas and stairs was fabricated with reclaimed-recycled woods. [via] Sag Harbor House by Jendretzki Sponsored Link       Sag Harbor House by Jendretzki  Sag Harbor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wood work such as decks, pergolas and stairs was fabricated with reclaimed-recycled woods. [via] Sag Harbor House by Jendretzki Sponsored Link       Sag Harbor House by Jendretzki  Sag Harbor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saxon Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-88921</link>
		<dc:creator>Saxon Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-88921</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Pablo Jendretzki gets a little love from Arch Daily: well deserved! http://bit.ly/17CF0t&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Pablo Jendretzki gets a little love from Arch Daily: well deserved! <a href="http://bit.ly/17CF0t" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/17CF0t</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riko</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60040</link>
		<dc:creator>Riko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60040</guid>
		<description>I love it! think they did a great job... its a perfect home, and great for all year round...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it! think they did a great job&#8230; its a perfect home, and great for all year round&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-60001</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-60001</guid>
		<description>I find the stone fireplace wall one of my favorite elements.  I like the materiality of the railings too.  Beauty remains in the eye of the beholder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the stone fireplace wall one of my favorite elements.  I like the materiality of the railings too.  Beauty remains in the eye of the beholder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ygogolak</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59990</link>
		<dc:creator>ygogolak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59990</guid>
		<description>The stone wall with the fireplace is way out of scale.  Bad use of materials too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stone wall with the fireplace is way out of scale.  Bad use of materials too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StructureHub Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59978</link>
		<dc:creator>StructureHub Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59978</guid>
		<description>Amusing comments (regarding how this home is shockingly representative of the large majority of home renovation projects - e.g., simple home to begin with, a limited budget, and cautious approach to design).  

ArchDaily, although I don&#039;t think it is the most compelling of posts, it is one of the more refreshing - and you should consider doing more of them!  I think your viewers are getting numb to the good design you highlight every day - this project should give them a jolt of reality - where talented architects try making the most of a renovation project with limited potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amusing comments (regarding how this home is shockingly representative of the large majority of home renovation projects &#8211; e.g., simple home to begin with, a limited budget, and cautious approach to design).  </p>
<p>ArchDaily, although I don&#8217;t think it is the most compelling of posts, it is one of the more refreshing &#8211; and you should consider doing more of them!  I think your viewers are getting numb to the good design you highlight every day &#8211; this project should give them a jolt of reality &#8211; where talented architects try making the most of a renovation project with limited potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59977</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59977</guid>
		<description>A nice attempt to up the ante on detailing and materiality for a mostly traditional American residential norm.  No, its no flash-bang modernism, but that style is appreciated mostly by a small minority anyway.  No, I personally don&#039;t like the still present vestiges of unthinking traditionalism (gable framed window/circular window, eaves) on this house - but its a move in the right direction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice attempt to up the ante on detailing and materiality for a mostly traditional American residential norm.  No, its no flash-bang modernism, but that style is appreciated mostly by a small minority anyway.  No, I personally don&#8217;t like the still present vestiges of unthinking traditionalism (gable framed window/circular window, eaves) on this house &#8211; but its a move in the right direction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59944</guid>
		<description>..and I also think that the lack of &#039;life&#039; in the images are because there isn&#039;t stuff scattered throughout the photos like most of the homes shown here. The kitchen is empty and there is nothing on the walls...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and I also think that the lack of &#8216;life&#8217; in the images are because there isn&#8217;t stuff scattered throughout the photos like most of the homes shown here. The kitchen is empty and there is nothing on the walls&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59940</guid>
		<description>Just because a building isn&#039;t white, grey and have euro modern furniture in it, you hate it. The home fits in perfectly into it&#039;s location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a building isn&#8217;t white, grey and have euro modern furniture in it, you hate it. The home fits in perfectly into it&#8217;s location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59939</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59939</guid>
		<description>no contrast = boring. Lack of character and personality. Its like a shy or even a dead house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no contrast = boring. Lack of character and personality. Its like a shy or even a dead house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone from somewhere</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59938</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone from somewhere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59938</guid>
		<description>...What?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;What?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59931</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59931</guid>
		<description>very calm and warm building...fits perfect into its place imho. Very nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very calm and warm building&#8230;fits perfect into its place imho. Very nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etty</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35625/sag-harbor-house-jendretzki/#comment-59922</link>
		<dc:creator>etty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35625#comment-59922</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t like the window with the large wood framing detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t like the window with the large wood framing detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 21:28:26 by W3 Total Cache -->
