<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remington Court / HyBrid Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:09:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thincredible</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-207922</link>
		<dc:creator>thincredible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-207922</guid>
		<description>great work

many thanks to Ted Smith and the rest of the [woodbury] san diego clan for showing the way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great work</p>
<p>many thanks to Ted Smith and the rest of the [woodbury] san diego clan for showing the way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Studio 29: Shout-Out to Stephanie! &#124; sloArch</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-176655</link>
		<dc:creator>The Studio 29: Shout-Out to Stephanie! &#124; sloArch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-176655</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inavars</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-79653</link>
		<dc:creator>inavars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-79653</guid>
		<description>i wouldnt want to climb up and down three floors all day long</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldnt want to climb up and down three floors all day long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halima Rashid</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-78796</link>
		<dc:creator>Halima Rashid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-78796</guid>
		<description>I agree with u arquipablo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with u arquipablo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arquipablo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-75637</link>
		<dc:creator>arquipablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-75637</guid>
		<description>Very good project....

I think the idea of vertical housing is very common all over the world, only really matters the final results...Pretty place to live, congratulations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good project&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think the idea of vertical housing is very common all over the world, only really matters the final results&#8230;Pretty place to live, congratulations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snookiiz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-157117</link>
		<dc:creator>snookiiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-157117</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/xiMVt &gt;&gt;บันได นี่คิดทีหลังป่าวว่ะ เหมือนเอามาแปะเอาเลย&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content"><a href="http://bit.ly/xiMVt" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/xiMVt</a> &gt;&gt;บันได นี่คิดทีหลังป่าวว่ะ เหมือนเอามาแปะเอาเลย</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-74296</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-74296</guid>
		<description>I should add that I do believe project is progressive and interesting, but also fairly conservative by the standards of global contemporary architecture.  That was my real point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that I do believe project is progressive and interesting, but also fairly conservative by the standards of global contemporary architecture.  That was my real point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-74294</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-74294</guid>
		<description>No, and I never said that it was the intention of every home to be modern. But this site is about modern (contemporary) architecture. So you would assume that works posted here would be progressive in some way. 

Libeskind is hardly what I would think of as a progressive modern.  His buildings are formal exercises that really don&#039;t innovate beyond the level of geometry.  Other architects out there are innovating in terms of programming, financial models, social engagement, etc.  

And I don&#039;t condemn anyone for not subscribing to my personal aesthetics.  But buildings are a part of the public domain and, as such, are subject to criticism (mine, yours, other architects&#039;, the public&#039;s, etc.)  Architecture only gets better through criticism, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, and I never said that it was the intention of every home to be modern. But this site is about modern (contemporary) architecture. So you would assume that works posted here would be progressive in some way. </p>
<p>Libeskind is hardly what I would think of as a progressive modern.  His buildings are formal exercises that really don&#8217;t innovate beyond the level of geometry.  Other architects out there are innovating in terms of programming, financial models, social engagement, etc.  </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t condemn anyone for not subscribing to my personal aesthetics.  But buildings are a part of the public domain and, as such, are subject to criticism (mine, yours, other architects&#8217;, the public&#8217;s, etc.)  Architecture only gets better through criticism, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-74293</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-74293</guid>
		<description>The idea that timelessness should be the goal of architecture (as so many formal histories of architecture would have us believe) seems a bit strange to me.  Architecture is a deeply transactional profession: buildings are meant to interact with their inhabitants and to change over time.  So whenever an architect talks about trying to make &quot;timeless&quot; works of architecture, I&#039;m skeptical.  No piece of architecture is timeless: even the Parthenon and Pantheon are now just tourist sites, with certain analogues to a town like Las Vegas or a building like the Guggenheim Bilbao.  So is that our goal with &quot;timeless&quot; architecture: to make a new tourist site?

I don&#039;t deny that the project has some interesting details and pushes the envelope of Seattle&#039;s fairly conservative architectural standards. It does so (relatively) affordably. I just find it interesting that, by the metric of other global works of architecture on this website, much of the American work appears conservative and not really that innovative--in terms of its programming, its form, or its financial structure.  But maybe that&#039;s where American architecture is today: beholden to a rigid developers&#039; idea of what makes good architecture.  Yes, Hybrid were lucky that they didn&#039;t have to make developer townhomes.  But my argument is that these are in some ways merely an IKEA-ized version of the typical developer townhome.

This also isn&#039;t about my work, CW. A building becomes a part of public discourse and will be commented on and criticized.  Criticism is a valuable (indeed, essential) part of making architecture.  It&#039;s a weak kind of schoolyard argument to say, whenever one of your projects is criticized, &quot;well, fine, let&#039;s see YOUR work, then.&quot;  As if judging my work will make the original project any better, or less immune to criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that timelessness should be the goal of architecture (as so many formal histories of architecture would have us believe) seems a bit strange to me.  Architecture is a deeply transactional profession: buildings are meant to interact with their inhabitants and to change over time.  So whenever an architect talks about trying to make &#8220;timeless&#8221; works of architecture, I&#8217;m skeptical.  No piece of architecture is timeless: even the Parthenon and Pantheon are now just tourist sites, with certain analogues to a town like Las Vegas or a building like the Guggenheim Bilbao.  So is that our goal with &#8220;timeless&#8221; architecture: to make a new tourist site?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t deny that the project has some interesting details and pushes the envelope of Seattle&#8217;s fairly conservative architectural standards. It does so (relatively) affordably. I just find it interesting that, by the metric of other global works of architecture on this website, much of the American work appears conservative and not really that innovative&#8211;in terms of its programming, its form, or its financial structure.  But maybe that&#8217;s where American architecture is today: beholden to a rigid developers&#8217; idea of what makes good architecture.  Yes, Hybrid were lucky that they didn&#8217;t have to make developer townhomes.  But my argument is that these are in some ways merely an IKEA-ized version of the typical developer townhome.</p>
<p>This also isn&#8217;t about my work, CW. A building becomes a part of public discourse and will be commented on and criticized.  Criticism is a valuable (indeed, essential) part of making architecture.  It&#8217;s a weak kind of schoolyard argument to say, whenever one of your projects is criticized, &#8220;well, fine, let&#8217;s see YOUR work, then.&#8221;  As if judging my work will make the original project any better, or less immune to criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YourMOMslover</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-74040</link>
		<dc:creator>YourMOMslover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-74040</guid>
		<description>thanks for responding to all these idiots...keep building man...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for responding to all these idiots&#8230;keep building man&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-73912</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-73912</guid>
		<description>Matt please post some of your work. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt please post some of your work. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-71929</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-71929</guid>
		<description>I was the project manager/superintendent of this project and I will tell you that we were not trying to be innovative....rather we were designing for the masses and attempting to create a building that could adapt over time to the needs of the neighborhood.  It can easily morph to be 6 units and can allow for the homeowners to generate some additional income to supplement their mortgage with the mother-in-law units at the ground.  This is the reason for the elevated entries and stoops.  Unfortunately it is not ADA &quot;friendly&quot; but it is not a commercial office building.  

Buildings don&#039;t have to be innovative to be timeless and you would be surprised to find out that these were market rate homes, sold for about $300/sf...which is unheard of in downtown Seattle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was the project manager/superintendent of this project and I will tell you that we were not trying to be innovative&#8230;.rather we were designing for the masses and attempting to create a building that could adapt over time to the needs of the neighborhood.  It can easily morph to be 6 units and can allow for the homeowners to generate some additional income to supplement their mortgage with the mother-in-law units at the ground.  This is the reason for the elevated entries and stoops.  Unfortunately it is not ADA &#8220;friendly&#8221; but it is not a commercial office building.  </p>
<p>Buildings don&#8217;t have to be innovative to be timeless and you would be surprised to find out that these were market rate homes, sold for about $300/sf&#8230;which is unheard of in downtown Seattle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wally</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-71404</link>
		<dc:creator>wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-71404</guid>
		<description>demasiado parecido al proyecto elemental de alejandro aravena, solo que este proyecto es para gente con una capacidad adquisitiva mayor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>demasiado parecido al proyecto elemental de alejandro aravena, solo que este proyecto es para gente con una capacidad adquisitiva mayor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remington Court &#8211; Modern House by HyBrid Architecture - Architecture - Muslim Rahman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-71390</link>
		<dc:creator>Remington Court &#8211; Modern House by HyBrid Architecture - Architecture - Muslim Rahman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-71390</guid>
		<description>[...] Pho&amp;#116&amp;#111&amp;#103raphs: Lara Swimmer, Cleary O’Farrell and Nick W&amp;#105&amp;#108&amp;#108iams via   #gallery-1 { margin: auto; } #gallery-1 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pho&amp;#116&amp;#111&amp;#103raphs: Lara Swimmer, Cleary O’Farrell and Nick W&amp;#105&amp;#108&amp;#108iams via   #gallery-1 { margin: auto; } #gallery-1 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orla</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-71379</link>
		<dc:creator>orla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-71379</guid>
		<description>i agree, just adding hot money instead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree, just adding hot money instead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qaA</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-71378</link>
		<dc:creator>qaA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-71378</guid>
		<description>first look:
&quot;elemental chile, social housing in Iquique&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first look:<br />
&#8220;elemental chile, social housing in Iquique&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z99</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-71005</link>
		<dc:creator>z99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-71005</guid>
		<description>Innovative or not, this project works really well. It appears comfortable to live in, timeless, and is not an eye soar from the street. It fits well with the context...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Innovative or not, this project works really well. It appears comfortable to live in, timeless, and is not an eye soar from the street. It fits well with the context&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesignGraph</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-157120</link>
		<dc:creator>DesignGraph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-157120</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/3wrhu5 http://bit.ly/22y4DJ&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content"><a href="http://bit.ly/3wrhu5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3wrhu5</a> <a href="http://bit.ly/22y4DJ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/22y4DJ</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas foral</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-157121</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas foral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-157121</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Remington Court / HyBrid Architecture &#124; ArchDaily - http://shar.es/axZWz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Remington Court / HyBrid Architecture | ArchDaily &#8211; <a href="http://shar.es/axZWz" rel="nofollow">http://shar.es/axZWz</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupesh Jamkhindikar</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/35108/remington-court-hybrid-architecture/#comment-70683</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupesh Jamkhindikar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=35108#comment-70683</guid>
		<description>Ace stuff.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ace stuff&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 15:16:20 by W3 Total Cache -->
