<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London 2012 Olympic Stadium / Populous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coach hire companies in london</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-1110259</link>
		<dc:creator>coach hire companies in london</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-1110259</guid>
		<description>Unquestionably consider that that you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the simplest thing to be mindful of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while other people think about worries that they just do not recognize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest as smartly as defined out the entire thing with no need side effect , people can take a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unquestionably consider that that you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the simplest thing to be mindful of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while other people think about worries that they just do not recognize about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest as smartly as defined out the entire thing with no need side effect , people can take a signal. Will likely be again to get more. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nguyen thanh</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-368548</link>
		<dc:creator>nguyen thanh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-368548</guid>
		<description>i thick that : that it very cant make by from wood</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thick that : that it very cant make by from wood</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amu</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-358100</link>
		<dc:creator>Amu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-358100</guid>
		<description>I would like to add that this project is nothing but a hype. I don&#039;t understand whether spectators will be visiting to enjoy the game or appreciate the arcade. It is just a waste of time and money and obviously a way to sell their expensive tickets. Well i suggests you to enjoy the games at home. Its worth investing in a big screen television set than to waste enormous amount of money that you would spend otherwise traveling all the way to the venue and paying for worthless tickets. Just mull over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add that this project is nothing but a hype. I don&#8217;t understand whether spectators will be visiting to enjoy the game or appreciate the arcade. It is just a waste of time and money and obviously a way to sell their expensive tickets. Well i suggests you to enjoy the games at home. Its worth investing in a big screen television set than to waste enormous amount of money that you would spend otherwise traveling all the way to the venue and paying for worthless tickets. Just mull over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago Pires</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-203035</link>
		<dc:creator>Thiago Pires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-203035</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Lee comanda o projeto do estadio olímpico de Londres e o apresentou hj. É incrível a revitalização da East London. http://tinyurl.com/nxhtv7&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Lee comanda o projeto do estadio olímpico de Londres e o apresentou hj. É incrível a revitalização da East London. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nxhtv7" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nxhtv7</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Die Arroganz der Leichtathleten &#124; RAPIDHAMMER</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-116532</link>
		<dc:creator>Die Arroganz der Leichtathleten &#124; RAPIDHAMMER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-116532</guid>
		<description>[...] frühere West Ham-Chairman Eggert Magnusson hatte über eine Übersiedlung ins Olympia-Stadion von POPULOUS  (Modell rechts) nach dem Ende der Spiele 2012 nachgedacht, sich dann aber für einen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] frühere West Ham-Chairman Eggert Magnusson hatte über eine Übersiedlung ins Olympia-Stadion von POPULOUS  (Modell rechts) nach dem Ende der Spiele 2012 nachgedacht, sich dann aber für einen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hefty</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-107906</link>
		<dc:creator>Hefty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-107906</guid>
		<description>I think this is quite a disappointment to what stadiums should look like. Looks like a dish of Trifle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is quite a disappointment to what stadiums should look like. Looks like a dish of Trifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBX</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-84009</link>
		<dc:creator>TBX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-84009</guid>
		<description>I think this building raises an interesting question as to how permanent we want our buildings to be? Is it really alright to just fill up all available space with massive buildings that are all competing to take all the attention of the world around them?

It could be interesting if buildings would be designed to be able to be simply deconstructed (instead of demolished) after 50 years or so. It would make for flexible cities, that can reinvent themselves over and over again and evolve along with technology.

As for the design itself: I like the honesty in the structure. It&#039;s a no-nonsense build-up, with a colourful membrane around it (in itself flexible to change). Sure it&#039;s a bit of a lost opportunity for an impressive design, but a gained one for sending a message...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this building raises an interesting question as to how permanent we want our buildings to be? Is it really alright to just fill up all available space with massive buildings that are all competing to take all the attention of the world around them?</p>
<p>It could be interesting if buildings would be designed to be able to be simply deconstructed (instead of demolished) after 50 years or so. It would make for flexible cities, that can reinvent themselves over and over again and evolve along with technology.</p>
<p>As for the design itself: I like the honesty in the structure. It&#8217;s a no-nonsense build-up, with a colourful membrane around it (in itself flexible to change). Sure it&#8217;s a bit of a lost opportunity for an impressive design, but a gained one for sending a message&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-83638</link>
		<dc:creator>shamim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-83638</guid>
		<description>oh my god...i dont know what to say. just a copy paste product &amp; it costs 550m pounds.
come on its Olympic 2012...u have to impress the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my god&#8230;i dont know what to say. just a copy paste product &amp; it costs 550m pounds.<br />
come on its Olympic 2012&#8230;u have to impress the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onder</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-83393</link>
		<dc:creator>Onder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-83393</guid>
		<description>i want to see the other proposals about london 2012 main / and other stadiums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to see the other proposals about london 2012 main / and other stadiums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD Round Up: Stadiums Part I &#124; ArchDaily</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-83344</link>
		<dc:creator>AD Round Up: Stadiums Part I &#124; ArchDaily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-83344</guid>
		<description>[...] Olympics so Populous faced a difficult challenge in designing the Olympic Stadium for London 2012 (read more&#8230;)New Dalian Shide FC Stadium / UNStudio After winning a limited competition, UNStudio will move [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Olympics so Populous faced a difficult challenge in designing the Olympic Stadium for London 2012 (read more&#8230;)New Dalian Shide FC Stadium / UNStudio After winning a limited competition, UNStudio will move [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leporello</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-87444</link>
		<dc:creator>leporello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-87444</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;&quot;London 2012 Olympic Stadium / Populous &#124; ArchDaily&quot; (http://twitthis.com/th5mv8)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">&quot;London 2012 Olympic Stadium / Populous | ArchDaily&quot; (<a href="http://twitthis.com/th5mv8" rel="nofollow">http://twitthis.com/th5mv8</a>)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imágenes del Estadio Olímpico Londres 2012 &#124; Concreto</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-58729</link>
		<dc:creator>Imágenes del Estadio Olímpico Londres 2012 &#124; Concreto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-58729</guid>
		<description>[...] muestro dos imágenes del estadio de los Juegos Olímpicos de Beijing 2008 para que comparen. Vía archdaily.  Londres [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] muestro dos imágenes del estadio de los Juegos Olímpicos de Beijing 2008 para que comparen. Vía archdaily.  Londres [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raffa</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-55023</link>
		<dc:creator>raffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-55023</guid>
		<description>and it costs 550m pounds.

its a smack in the face of the great modular/temporary architecture designs at expo&#039;s and fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and it costs 550m pounds.</p>
<p>its a smack in the face of the great modular/temporary architecture designs at expo&#8217;s and fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TopDogThomas</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-87453</link>
		<dc:creator>TopDogThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-87453</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Check out: &quot;London 2012 Olympic Stadium / Populous &#124; ArchDaily&quot; (http://twitthis.com/th5mv8)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Check out: &quot;London 2012 Olympic Stadium / Populous | ArchDaily&quot; (<a href="http://twitthis.com/th5mv8" rel="nofollow">http://twitthis.com/th5mv8</a>)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annick Labeca</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-87465</link>
		<dc:creator>Annick Labeca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 02:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-87465</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Reading an article on London 2012 Olympic Stadium, I was wondering how Paris 2012 Olympic Stadium would look like if… http://bit.ly/15Isi2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Reading an article on London 2012 Olympic Stadium, I was wondering how Paris 2012 Olympic Stadium would look like if… <a href="http://bit.ly/15Isi2" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/15Isi2</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helen</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-53067</link>
		<dc:creator>helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-53067</guid>
		<description>except leverkusen was an renovation/reconstruction while this is just embarrassing for london.
theres a million options for it to be beautiful/&quot;green&quot; without looking like all the parts were purchased from walmart..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>except leverkusen was an renovation/reconstruction while this is just embarrassing for london.<br />
theres a million options for it to be beautiful/&#8221;green&#8221; without looking like all the parts were purchased from walmart..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helen</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-53066</link>
		<dc:creator>helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-53066</guid>
		<description>ditto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ditto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EgoConcept</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-52628</link>
		<dc:creator>EgoConcept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-52628</guid>
		<description>Its just way to simple. Too symmetrical, too boring

This is not supposed to be a normal stadium, people expect more from the olympics..but then sustainability comes to mind...how much WASTE does every olympic city produce by building these olympic cities, one every 4 years...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its just way to simple. Too symmetrical, too boring</p>
<p>This is not supposed to be a normal stadium, people expect more from the olympics..but then sustainability comes to mind&#8230;how much WASTE does every olympic city produce by building these olympic cities, one every 4 years&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juni</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-52574</link>
		<dc:creator>Juni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-52574</guid>
		<description>I have to say... you are right. Nice project for Bayer Leverkussen btw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say&#8230; you are right. Nice project for Bayer Leverkussen btw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plagiattore</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33268/london-2012-olympic-stadium-populous/#comment-52457</link>
		<dc:creator>Plagiattore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33268#comment-52457</guid>
		<description>Nice, Copy and Paste Project!!
Look at the stadium in Leverkusen, Germany:

http://www.baunetz.de/architekten/architektenprofil_unterseite_818294.html

Greets Plagiattore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, Copy and Paste Project!!<br />
Look at the stadium in Leverkusen, Germany:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baunetz.de/architekten/architektenprofil_unterseite_818294.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.baunetz.de/architekten/architektenprofil_unterseite_818294.html</a></p>
<p>Greets Plagiattore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 16:01:19 by W3 Total Cache -->
