<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barents Secretariat Tower / Reiulf Ramstad Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-377515</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 02:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-377515</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @tejaark: let&#039;s store the CO2 in our buildings!  Barents Tower in Norway- 16 stoney skyscraper made of wood  http://t.co/OEjpexF via  ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @tejaark: let&#39;s store the CO2 in our buildings!  Barents Tower in Norway- 16 stoney skyscraper made of wood  <a href="http://t.co/OEjpexF" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/OEjpexF</a> via  &#8230;</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teja</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-377471</link>
		<dc:creator>Teja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 01:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-377471</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;let&#039;s store the CO2 in our buildings!  Barents Tower in Norway- 16 stoney skyscraper made of wood  http://t.co/OEjpexF via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">let&#39;s store the CO2 in our buildings!  Barents Tower in Norway- 16 stoney skyscraper made of wood  <a href="http://t.co/OEjpexF" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/OEjpexF</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CS.no &#187; Norway’s wooden building to be the tallest in the world</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-131518</link>
		<dc:creator>CS.no &#187; Norway’s wooden building to be the tallest in the world</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-131518</guid>
		<description>[...] [ArchDaily] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [ArchDaily] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-154311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Parent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-154311</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Barents Secretariat Tower / Reiulf Ramstad Architects &#124; ArchDaily: http://bit.ly/drQqNC via @addthis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Barents Secretariat Tower / Reiulf Ramstad Architects | ArchDaily: <a href="http://bit.ly/drQqNC" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/drQqNC</a> via @addthis</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FG</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51999</link>
		<dc:creator>FG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51999</guid>
		<description>It seems odd to be to build this tall in a small place like Kirkenes. I&#039;m wondering if there is Murmansk and Kiruna envy (the two closest, and larger, cities, which both have high rise buildings galore).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems odd to be to build this tall in a small place like Kirkenes. I&#8217;m wondering if there is Murmansk and Kiruna envy (the two closest, and larger, cities, which both have high rise buildings galore).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YAUHO</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51770</link>
		<dc:creator>YAUHO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51770</guid>
		<description>I mean at that height, there must be some other element for fire protection to e.g. exit staircase or main sturcture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean at that height, there must be some other element for fire protection to e.g. exit staircase or main sturcture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51604</guid>
		<description>Waht is beautiful is the way different cultural backgrounds read architecture in other parts of their world. They may end up judging incorrectly, but it is still intersting to look at their readings. Architecture today is a global language. On this site we can also read a single project in a single context that we can see through few photos and drawings only, and this may be misleading sometimes. Being said, as an architect, one can point out things that he reflect his own vision and own architectural preferences.
Wgile the material selection on this job is appropriate, the overall volume is out of scale compared to the context.
We have seen in some workhops with architects from Switzerland and Sweden examples of a more context-sensitive architecture that is easily blending with the surrounding, and I guess those were more succefull models in terms of contextual approach, than waht we see here.
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waht is beautiful is the way different cultural backgrounds read architecture in other parts of their world. They may end up judging incorrectly, but it is still intersting to look at their readings. Architecture today is a global language. On this site we can also read a single project in a single context that we can see through few photos and drawings only, and this may be misleading sometimes. Being said, as an architect, one can point out things that he reflect his own vision and own architectural preferences.<br />
Wgile the material selection on this job is appropriate, the overall volume is out of scale compared to the context.<br />
We have seen in some workhops with architects from Switzerland and Sweden examples of a more context-sensitive architecture that is easily blending with the surrounding, and I guess those were more succefull models in terms of contextual approach, than waht we see here.<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51596</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51596</guid>
		<description>We have always built our houses in wood here in Norway and we continue to do so. Your cultural ignorance is interesting, you&#039;re just not used to it I guess.

Yes, even the structural elements.

My all-wood house is nothing to be laughed at, no fires or integrity problems since its construction in 1860.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have always built our houses in wood here in Norway and we continue to do so. Your cultural ignorance is interesting, you&#8217;re just not used to it I guess.</p>
<p>Yes, even the structural elements.</p>
<p>My all-wood house is nothing to be laughed at, no fires or integrity problems since its construction in 1860.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51593</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51593</guid>
		<description>Your belittling tells me all I need to know about you and your LACK of knowledge with regards to Norway, the Arctic and this city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your belittling tells me all I need to know about you and your LACK of knowledge with regards to Norway, the Arctic and this city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51590</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51590</guid>
		<description>Any comments from your Prince Charles, or any other foreigner, would not be of interest to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any comments from your Prince Charles, or any other foreigner, would not be of interest to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51535</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51535</guid>
		<description>really...in this context. This building looks like a design for a large city...not this &#039;village&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really&#8230;in this context. This building looks like a design for a large city&#8230;not this &#8216;village&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahmoud</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51481</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahmoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51481</guid>
		<description>The building has nothing to do with the setting. It si completely an alien to the site. THe overall is a typical repetition of trends in vertical buildings and does not suggest a new approach. SUch a unique peacefull landscape desrves a better architecture in my opinion.
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The building has nothing to do with the setting. It si completely an alien to the site. THe overall is a typical repetition of trends in vertical buildings and does not suggest a new approach. SUch a unique peacefull landscape desrves a better architecture in my opinion.<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barents Secretariat Tower / Reiulf Ramstad Architects &#171; Pete Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51444</link>
		<dc:creator>Barents Secretariat Tower / Reiulf Ramstad Architects &#171; Pete Gilbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51444</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Archdaily.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Archdaily.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Lins</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-154316</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Lins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-154316</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Barents Secretariat Tower / Reiulf Ramstad Architects #architecture http://is.gd/2wISO&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Barents Secretariat Tower / Reiulf Ramstad Architects #architecture <a href="http://is.gd/2wISO" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/2wISO</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YAUHO</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51426</link>
		<dc:creator>YAUHO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51426</guid>
		<description>the structural elements are really in timber? and a mixed use building too? the fire code in Norway is way ahead of other parts of the world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the structural elements are really in timber? and a mixed use building too? the fire code in Norway is way ahead of other parts of the world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51330</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51330</guid>
		<description>.....are you kidding, this is outrageous, look at the context, where&#039;s Prince Charles when you need him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..are you kidding, this is outrageous, look at the context, where&#8217;s Prince Charles when you need him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trigeia Twins</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51310</link>
		<dc:creator>Trigeia Twins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51310</guid>
		<description>Dont Get it ? Just like IPMan Said this project will not age well. It doesnt make sense just like these sky planters http://www.trigeia.com/article.php?id=95503 LOL 

Follow @Trigeia on Twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont Get it ? Just like IPMan Said this project will not age well. It doesnt make sense just like these sky planters <a href="http://www.trigeia.com/article.php?id=95503" rel="nofollow">http://www.trigeia.com/article.php?id=95503</a> LOL </p>
<p>Follow @Trigeia on Twitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPMan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51296</link>
		<dc:creator>IPMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51296</guid>
		<description>Care to name (and link to) some examples htx75qr8? The only ones I know of are quite a bit lower and not yet old enough to say anything about their ageing process. In other words you talk the talk but do you walk the walk? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to name (and link to) some examples htx75qr8? The only ones I know of are quite a bit lower and not yet old enough to say anything about their ageing process. In other words you talk the talk but do you walk the walk? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htx75qr8</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51292</link>
		<dc:creator>htx75qr8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51292</guid>
		<description>Scale aside.  The idea is already dated.  Good examples of this type of project exist all over the world, and none of them are aging well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scale aside.  The idea is already dated.  Good examples of this type of project exist all over the world, and none of them are aging well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tweedy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/33090/barents-secretariat-tower-reiulf-ramstad-architects/#comment-51288</link>
		<dc:creator>tweedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=33090#comment-51288</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does this building seem quite out of scale? Especially when looking at the section? My understanding was that Norway had quite a resistant approach to building huge buildings and when I see this project, I cant help to imagine what the people of Kirkenes will think about it? I would think twice before introducing such an alien object into this little towns context.

I also have to admit, I immediately become suspicious when a building is marketed with its height...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does this building seem quite out of scale? Especially when looking at the section? My understanding was that Norway had quite a resistant approach to building huge buildings and when I see this project, I cant help to imagine what the people of Kirkenes will think about it? I would think twice before introducing such an alien object into this little towns context.</p>
<p>I also have to admit, I immediately become suspicious when a building is marketed with its height&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-11 00:14:03 by W3 Total Cache -->
