<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Architecture Office / bad architects group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wood panels</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-902548</link>
		<dc:creator>wood panels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-902548</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been browsing online greater than three hours these days, yet I by no means discovered any interesting article like yours. It?s lovely worth enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content material as you did, the net shall be much more useful than ever before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been browsing online greater than three hours these days, yet I by no means discovered any interesting article like yours. It?s lovely worth enough for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made good content material as you did, the net shall be much more useful than ever before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anood bin 6ag3a</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-331120</link>
		<dc:creator>anood bin 6ag3a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-331120</guid>
		<description>halla w ghalla ya labeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh ya 6am 6am ya bollaaaa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>halla w ghalla ya labeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh ya 6am 6am ya bollaaaa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seeta binjumah</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-331096</link>
		<dc:creator>seeta binjumah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-331096</guid>
		<description>can you tell me about the site size??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you tell me about the site size??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weerapat Chokedee</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-169573</link>
		<dc:creator>Weerapat Chokedee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-169573</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Reading: &quot;Architecture Office / bad architects group &#124; ArchDaily&quot; (http://twitthis.com/w8n6lv)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Reading: &quot;Architecture Office / bad architects group | ArchDaily&quot; (<a href="http://twitthis.com/w8n6lv" rel="nofollow">http://twitthis.com/w8n6lv</a>)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorebini</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-51295</link>
		<dc:creator>lorebini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-51295</guid>
		<description>cool office, with a very nice and ironic &#039;foamous&#039; screen, good connection with the street and... a lot of storage space!
Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool office, with a very nice and ironic &#8216;foamous&#8217; screen, good connection with the street and&#8230; a lot of storage space!<br />
Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StructureHub Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-51280</link>
		<dc:creator>StructureHub Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-51280</guid>
		<description>I also love the name of the firm - but ironically, think this is one of the &quot;less good&quot; project&#039;s they&#039;ve done.  It&#039;s rather muddled, and I think the exterior blending of old facade and new first-story opening is as unfortunate as similar attempts done by misguided architects in the 60s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also love the name of the firm &#8211; but ironically, think this is one of the &#8220;less good&#8221; project&#8217;s they&#8217;ve done.  It&#8217;s rather muddled, and I think the exterior blending of old facade and new first-story opening is as unfortunate as similar attempts done by misguided architects in the 60s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.Nowicki</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-50958</link>
		<dc:creator>T.Nowicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-50958</guid>
		<description>the really interesting thing is not the look of this office but direct connection of nightlife of the street and the (bad :) architectural work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the really interesting thing is not the look of this office but direct connection of nightlife of the street and the (bad :) architectural work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-50945</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-50945</guid>
		<description>the building is nice, but what im really excited about is the name of the group</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the building is nice, but what im really excited about is the name of the group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raposa</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-50817</link>
		<dc:creator>raposa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-50817</guid>
		<description>Beautiful Workspace 
How did you cut those foam dividers ?  wouldn&#039;t they break easily ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful Workspace<br />
How did you cut those foam dividers ?  wouldn&#8217;t they break easily ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neoarq</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-50805</link>
		<dc:creator>Neoarq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-50805</guid>
		<description>Exteriors of first good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exteriors of first good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fudge</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-50761</link>
		<dc:creator>Fudge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-50761</guid>
		<description>The exterior looked promising, but the second I saw that interior shot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exterior looked promising, but the second I saw that interior shot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IngeniousForm</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-169574</link>
		<dc:creator>IngeniousForm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-169574</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: Architecture Office / bad architects group http://bit.ly/tcHO3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: Architecture Office / bad architects group <a href="http://bit.ly/tcHO3" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/tcHO3</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DANIEL RUEDA</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-169575</link>
		<dc:creator>DANIEL RUEDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-169575</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Architecture Office / bad architects group: 
Architects: bad architects group Location: Innsbruck, Austria Proje.. http://bit.ly/4qB1iI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Architecture Office / bad architects group:<br />
Architects: bad architects group Location: Innsbruck, Austria Proje.. <a href="http://bit.ly/4qB1iI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4qB1iI</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architecture+Molding</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-169576</link>
		<dc:creator>Architecture+Molding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-169576</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Architecture Office / bad architects group: 
Architects: bad architects group Location: Innsbruck, Austria Proje.. http://bit.ly/4qB1iI&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Architecture Office / bad architects group:<br />
Architects: bad architects group Location: Innsbruck, Austria Proje.. <a href="http://bit.ly/4qB1iI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4qB1iI</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darla</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-50691</link>
		<dc:creator>darla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-50691</guid>
		<description>how bad do you have to be employed by this office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how bad do you have to be employed by this office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deazaskia</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32498/architecture-office-bad-architects-group/#comment-169577</link>
		<dc:creator>Deazaskia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32498#comment-169577</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;the architect group&#039;s name is kinda cool... or not! XD RT : @archdaily Architecture Office / bad architects group http://bit.ly/tcHO3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">the architect group&#8217;s name is kinda cool&#8230; or not! XD RT : @archdaily Architecture Office / bad architects group <a href="http://bit.ly/tcHO3" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/tcHO3</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 11:11:20 by W3 Total Cache -->
