<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 904 Pacific Street / Loadingdock5 Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 楽天スーパーポイント獲得秘訣</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-188433</link>
		<dc:creator>楽天スーパーポイント獲得秘訣</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-188433</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @rakutenblog: サイクリングにポタリング!?自転車の記事投稿でポインツGET!
⇒http://bit.ly/brRDd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @rakutenblog: サイクリングにポタリング!?自転車の記事投稿でポインツGET!<br />
⇒http://bit.ly/brRDd</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 楽天ブログ</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-188381</link>
		<dc:creator>楽天ブログ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-188381</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;サイクリングにポタリング!?自転車の記事投稿でポインツGET!
⇒http://bit.ly/brRDd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">サイクリングにポタリング!?自転車の記事投稿でポインツGET!<br />
⇒http://bit.ly/brRDd</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 楽天ブログ</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-188382</link>
		<dc:creator>楽天ブログ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-188382</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;サイクリングにポタリング!?自転車の記事投稿でポインツGET!
⇒http://bit.ly/brRDd&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">サイクリングにポタリング!?自転車の記事投稿でポインツGET!<br />
⇒http://bit.ly/brRDd</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: json</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-59738</link>
		<dc:creator>json</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-59738</guid>
		<description>We pretty much walked into every single unit, each one has something wrong with the layout. From a real estate point of view, it would&#039;ve better to have a bunch of stacked dumb boxes. Trying too hard to be different for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We pretty much walked into every single unit, each one has something wrong with the layout. From a real estate point of view, it would&#8217;ve better to have a bunch of stacked dumb boxes. Trying too hard to be different for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jie</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-59543</link>
		<dc:creator>jie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-59543</guid>
		<description>I feel this web good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel this web good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar falcón lara</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-59091</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar falcón lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-59091</guid>
		<description>I myself have not been there but the solution seems very straightforward for such a restricted lot. Building quality aside, on the purely formal standpoint, I find the facade arrangement interesting, with the red bands breaking two types of window arrangements and a terrace on top. Now living there would be another ball game as suggested in the comments before mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself have not been there but the solution seems very straightforward for such a restricted lot. Building quality aside, on the purely formal standpoint, I find the facade arrangement interesting, with the red bands breaking two types of window arrangements and a terrace on top. Now living there would be another ball game as suggested in the comments before mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smoon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-59058</link>
		<dc:creator>smoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-59058</guid>
		<description>I also went to the open house here, and thought what a poorly built building!
The quality control was out of picture, in my opinion...and the spacial quality in each unit was little odd, too.
I think, they wanted to focus more on having large open living room and closet size bedrooms with odd looking closet doors with aweful hardwares...
If I&#039;m looking to buy an apartment, this is certainly not the one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also went to the open house here, and thought what a poorly built building!<br />
The quality control was out of picture, in my opinion&#8230;and the spacial quality in each unit was little odd, too.<br />
I think, they wanted to focus more on having large open living room and closet size bedrooms with odd looking closet doors with aweful hardwares&#8230;<br />
If I&#8217;m looking to buy an apartment, this is certainly not the one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas foral</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-154995</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas foral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-154995</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;904 Pacific Street / Loadingdock5 Architecture &#124; ArchDaily - http://shar.es/1pQPp&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">904 Pacific Street / Loadingdock5 Architecture | ArchDaily &#8211; <a href="http://shar.es/1pQPp" rel="nofollow">http://shar.es/1pQPp</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-58922</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-58922</guid>
		<description>I went to an open house here and while the overall shots seem nice, the actual quality of the construction and feel of the place is another story.  It looks like a miami spacship landed on a gritty brooklyn block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to an open house here and while the overall shots seem nice, the actual quality of the construction and feel of the place is another story.  It looks like a miami spacship landed on a gritty brooklyn block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Patten</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-90130</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Patten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-90130</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;I&#039;d Live Here: 904 Pacific Street. http://bit.ly/3I3JvW&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">I&#39;d Live Here: 904 Pacific Street. <a href="http://bit.ly/3I3JvW" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3I3JvW</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egelyn Braun</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-155005</link>
		<dc:creator>Egelyn Braun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-155005</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;For whatever reason, I&#039;m very impressed by this minimalistic house in Brooklyn, New York. Via Archdaily: http://bit.ly/2mPFRn&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">For whatever reason, I&#8217;m very impressed by this minimalistic house in Brooklyn, New York. Via Archdaily: <a href="http://bit.ly/2mPFRn" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2mPFRn</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egelyn Braun</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-155011</link>
		<dc:creator>Egelyn Braun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-155011</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;For whatever reason, I&#039;m very impressed by this minimalistic house in Brooklyn, New York. Via archdaily: http://bit.ly/2mPFRn&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">For whatever reason, I&#8217;m very impressed by this minimalistic house in Brooklyn, New York. Via archdaily: <a href="http://bit.ly/2mPFRn" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2mPFRn</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leporello</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/32182/904-pacific-street-loadingdock5-architecture/#comment-155018</link>
		<dc:creator>leporello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=32182#comment-155018</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;外観はショーケース、パズルのようなプラン、ニューヨークのハウジング。高層でないのが良い、セレブだね。RT  904 Pacific Street / Loadingdock5 Architecture http://bit.ly/3ognYB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">外観はショーケース、パズルのようなプラン、ニューヨークのハウジング。高層でないのが良い、セレブだね。RT  904 Pacific Street / Loadingdock5 Architecture <a href="http://bit.ly/3ognYB" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3ognYB</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 12:50:37 by W3 Total Cache -->
