Northwestern University confirms the demise of Prentice Women’s Hospital

© C. William Brubaker via Flickr user UIC Digital Collections

The new year is off to a rough start for the of modern architecture, as Bertrand Goldberg’s Prentice Woman’s Hospital appears to be joining Richard Neutra’s Cyclorama Center on the demolition list for 2013. Northwestern University senior vice president for business and finance, Eugene S. Sunshine has confirmed that, despite strong opposition from architects and preservationists worldwide, the university will be replacing the historic, icon with a new biomedical research facility.

“The new building on the Prentice site will be connected on a floor-by-floor basis with the existing University research building just to the west of the site,” announced Sunshine in a press release. “Doing so will bring researchers together and thereby enhance the chances of finding breakthroughs in cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative disorders, among others. The site is the linchpin for what will be a major new medical research hub.”

More on this controversial decision after the break…

Whatever happened to the lawsuit filed by preservationists that granted Prentice temporary landmark status?

According to the Chicago Tribune, “A judge on Friday gave preservationists 30 days to amend their legal challenge to a landmarks commission ruling that would appear to doom old Prentice Women’s Hospital, but strongly hinted that time is running out for the Streeterville structure.”

Sunshine’s statement also announced Northwestern’s plan to invite “many of the world’s best architectural firms, including Chicago firms” in an international design competition for the new structure.

via ArtInfoThe Chicago Tribune

Cite: Rosenfield, Karissa. "Northwestern University confirms the demise of Prentice Women’s Hospital" 14 Jan 2013. ArchDaily. Accessed 23 Oct 2014. <http://www.archdaily.com/?p=318242>
  • noname artist

    Dark day in Chicago. Watch, some lame SOM’esque proposal will be politically maneuvered into action and we’ll just have another big box eyesore bearing down on us.

  • http://www.urbanarchnow.com Jonathan Choe

    rather than demolish Goldberg’s iconic building, why not move it to a new location?

  • Tim Forest

    It looks hideous. The podium doesn’t synchronize with the clover-like facade. The windows.. although trying to create character looks sad when matched with the bland concrete walls. It’s loud in a sense that its different, but it’s tone is melancholy.