<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasem Nadoum</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-1685533</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasem Nadoum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-1685533</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/nRuGRFbl via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/nRuGRFbl" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/nRuGRFbl</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCD Atelier</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-443316</link>
		<dc:creator>HCD Atelier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-443316</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies &#124; ArchDaily http://t.co/Bc3YE0u via @archdaily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies | ArchDaily <a href="http://t.co/Bc3YE0u" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/Bc3YE0u</a> via @archdaily</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ala' Ibrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-229837</link>
		<dc:creator>ala' Ibrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-229837</guid>
		<description>The most interesting thing in this project is the idea of the roof garden.the architect exploited the roof using some plants to show gardens.the building itself seems to be 2 shapes intersecting each others with some changes in levels,and its so related to the surroundings.Absolutely,its a very good example of green architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most interesting thing in this project is the idea of the roof garden.the architect exploited the roof using some plants to show gardens.the building itself seems to be 2 shapes intersecting each others with some changes in levels,and its so related to the surroundings.Absolutely,its a very good example of green architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deasy Pesoth</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-221086</link>
		<dc:creator>Deasy Pesoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-221086</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies http://bit.ly/VuuXr #Architecture&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies <a href="http://bit.ly/VuuXr" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/VuuXr</a> #Architecture</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shetu</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-125729</link>
		<dc:creator>shetu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-125729</guid>
		<description>I liked this project very much, except its entry. The entry looks a bit obscured. Its internal spaces are quite impressive, but it deserved to be a bit more interactive with the surroundings also, I think. overall, its an interesting project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked this project very much, except its entry. The entry looks a bit obscured. Its internal spaces are quite impressive, but it deserved to be a bit more interactive with the surroundings also, I think. overall, its an interesting project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suratos Advertising / &#187; Update: Ordos 100</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-110891</link>
		<dc:creator>Suratos Advertising / &#187; Update: Ordos 100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-110891</guid>
		<description>[...] have been posting architectural designs from the Ordos 100 project. Below is an article lifted from archdaily.com. I hope you enjoy it as much as I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been posting architectural designs from the Ordos 100 project. Below is an article lifted from archdaily.com. I hope you enjoy it as much as I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hayat Jamal</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-81308</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayat Jamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-81308</guid>
		<description>&quot;Three rings, each at different levels, interlaced at the center&quot;
= a guiding tool for the visitors or the clients as they know that each ring will contain a loop for either living/dining, or the sports/entertainment, or the private rooms/support 
= very clear technique &amp; interesting interaction 
  
&quot;Providing shortcuts to destinations within the house that minimize redundant movements&quot; is not the only advantage of the arrangement.. It also creates life &amp; provides varying shade effect in the paths which makes the circulation experience a pleasant one.

Choosing the court yard house as a concept is very powerful &amp; turns into a successful space. Well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Three rings, each at different levels, interlaced at the center&#8221;<br />
= a guiding tool for the visitors or the clients as they know that each ring will contain a loop for either living/dining, or the sports/entertainment, or the private rooms/support<br />
= very clear technique &amp; interesting interaction </p>
<p>&#8220;Providing shortcuts to destinations within the house that minimize redundant movements&#8221; is not the only advantage of the arrangement.. It also creates life &amp; provides varying shade effect in the paths which makes the circulation experience a pleasant one.</p>
<p>Choosing the court yard house as a concept is very powerful &amp; turns into a successful space. Well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-51647</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-51647</guid>
		<description>It takes no consideration to its surroundings, even though that is somewhat of the idea behind it. In the description it talks of vast nothingness, but in the renders its showing bright green grass growing. Not only in the project but around it. Weak project overall, more so the concept. A nice idea of creating flow of space, but fails in its realization of the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes no consideration to its surroundings, even though that is somewhat of the idea behind it. In the description it talks of vast nothingness, but in the renders its showing bright green grass growing. Not only in the project but around it. Weak project overall, more so the concept. A nice idea of creating flow of space, but fails in its realization of the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roberto treviño</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-48423</link>
		<dc:creator>roberto treviño</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-48423</guid>
		<description>S K E T C H U P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S K E T C H U P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rl</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-48112</link>
		<dc:creator>rl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-48112</guid>
		<description>how are those sections made?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how are those sections made?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GN</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-48075</link>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-48075</guid>
		<description>LIKE THE CONCEPT, BUT SPACES HAVE NO PROPORTION...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIKE THE CONCEPT, BUT SPACES HAVE NO PROPORTION&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorik</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-48057</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-48057</guid>
		<description>I liked much, it&#039;s a bit like a labyrinth, or a castle... There is a cool ludic dimension. Circulation space is not necessarily a bad thing, in this case lots of things seem to happen there, by looking at the sections. Very nice project!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked much, it&#8217;s a bit like a labyrinth, or a castle&#8230; There is a cool ludic dimension. Circulation space is not necessarily a bad thing, in this case lots of things seem to happen there, by looking at the sections. Very nice project!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hj</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-48051</link>
		<dc:creator>hj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-48051</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s freakin&#039; huge. really too many stairs. it&#039;s like an Escher project. so much circulation space, that all you do is walk around in your own home? what if you break a leg or have a buggy for your kids?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s freakin&#8217; huge. really too many stairs. it&#8217;s like an Escher project. so much circulation space, that all you do is walk around in your own home? what if you break a leg or have a buggy for your kids?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-161475</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-161475</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies http://bit.ly/13b0KB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: ORDOS 100 #44: Mass Studies <a href="http://bit.ly/13b0KB" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/13b0KB</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YAUHO</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-47982</link>
		<dc:creator>YAUHO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-47982</guid>
		<description>THE SCALE OF THIS DESIGN IS REALLY HARD TO UNDERSTAND, THE LOOPING STRUCTURE MAKE IT SEEMINGLY MUCH BIGGER INSTEAD OF  BREAKING THE SCALE DOWN, THE VIEWS OF THOSE INTERIOR COURTS LOOKS LIKE THE SCALE OF A 6/7 STORIES UNIVERSITY OR OFFICE BLDG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE SCALE OF THIS DESIGN IS REALLY HARD TO UNDERSTAND, THE LOOPING STRUCTURE MAKE IT SEEMINGLY MUCH BIGGER INSTEAD OF  BREAKING THE SCALE DOWN, THE VIEWS OF THOSE INTERIOR COURTS LOOKS LIKE THE SCALE OF A 6/7 STORIES UNIVERSITY OR OFFICE BLDG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-47971</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-47971</guid>
		<description>100 projects and no one of the architects said SORRY, i am not worthy. Instead some of them TRY and TRY and TRY to design...

...something.

Architecture need honesty.

A simple project will not be GREAT only because ORDOS call you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100 projects and no one of the architects said SORRY, i am not worthy. Instead some of them TRY and TRY and TRY to design&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;something.</p>
<p>Architecture need honesty.</p>
<p>A simple project will not be GREAT only because ORDOS call you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinking Cities</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-47949</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinking Cities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-47949</guid>
		<description>I agree that it looks like an overgrown bunker, but I like it because of that.  The sections show that there are some interesting spaces and relationships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it looks like an overgrown bunker, but I like it because of that.  The sections show that there are some interesting spaces and relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ren</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-47920</link>
		<dc:creator>ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-47920</guid>
		<description>i think we need a flashlight when i enter the space</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think we need a flashlight when i enter the space</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuf-Pak</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-47913</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuf-Pak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-47913</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a certain &quot;piling on&quot; that happens on this site in regards to the ORDOS projects.   I don&#039;t particularily like this design, it seems like a tedium of circulation for such a small building, but it&#039;s not a nightmare.

Like anything, it&#039;s easier and more fun to rant than to generate a reasoned critique.

I&#039;d have to say, my primary critique of the ORDOS project has less to do with the specific architectural decisions of these individual projects, and more to do with the somewhat blatant presentation of architecture as a class signifier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a certain &#8220;piling on&#8221; that happens on this site in regards to the ORDOS projects.   I don&#8217;t particularily like this design, it seems like a tedium of circulation for such a small building, but it&#8217;s not a nightmare.</p>
<p>Like anything, it&#8217;s easier and more fun to rant than to generate a reasoned critique.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to say, my primary critique of the ORDOS project has less to do with the specific architectural decisions of these individual projects, and more to do with the somewhat blatant presentation of architecture as a class signifier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Basulto [tricky]</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/31639/ordos-100-44-mass-studies/#comment-47896</link>
		<dc:creator>David Basulto [tricky]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=31639#comment-47896</guid>
		<description>ORDOS project requires villas to be 1000sqm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ORDOS project requires villas to be 1000sqm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 10:06:41 by W3 Total Cache -->
