<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canada Pavillion for Shanghai Expo 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-191519</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 06:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-191519</guid>
		<description>Most Canadians are totally unaware of Expo 2010 in Shanghai. They know nothing of this building or who designed it or the governments &quot;sole-source&quot; buddies, errr, builders. The $45ish million will also be a surprise. 

The minority Reform-con government, dealing with the G8/20 buildup and now the fall-out, neglected to mention Shanghai. They are flying this under the radar. 

Except that rumours abound about government MPs,MLAs, etc. are being tempted by Chinese businessmen, beautiful &quot;working girls&quot; as young as 14. Our innocent (cough) lads of the Great White North are being blackmailed, etc.etc. all in Shanghai. Ok, I&#039;ll admit, most of this colour commentary has come from one of the Con&#039;s own backbenchers. Everyone knows MP Rob Anders is a complete loon and Harper does not let him loose in polite company. But it does not explain why Harpo is keeping Shanghai secret. And the true cost of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Canadians are totally unaware of Expo 2010 in Shanghai. They know nothing of this building or who designed it or the governments &#8220;sole-source&#8221; buddies, errr, builders. The $45ish million will also be a surprise. </p>
<p>The minority Reform-con government, dealing with the G8/20 buildup and now the fall-out, neglected to mention Shanghai. They are flying this under the radar. </p>
<p>Except that rumours abound about government MPs,MLAs, etc. are being tempted by Chinese businessmen, beautiful &#8220;working girls&#8221; as young as 14. Our innocent (cough) lads of the Great White North are being blackmailed, etc.etc. all in Shanghai. Ok, I&#8217;ll admit, most of this colour commentary has come from one of the Con&#8217;s own backbenchers. Everyone knows MP Rob Anders is a complete loon and Harper does not let him loose in polite company. But it does not explain why Harpo is keeping Shanghai secret. And the true cost of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD Round Up: Shanghai Pavillions Part II &#8211; ConstructionArts News &#38; Information Network</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-135759</link>
		<dc:creator>AD Round Up: Shanghai Pavillions Part II &#8211; ConstructionArts News &#38; Information Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 10:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-135759</guid>
		<description>[...] Canada Pavillion The 6,000-square-meter Canada Pavilion, among the biggest at the site, will feature an exhibition themed “The Living City: Inclusive, Sustainable, Creative.” It is expected to welcome up to 5.5 million people or 30,000 visitors per day during the six-month Expo period. The pavilion will be anchored by an open public place and surrounded by three large structures (read more…) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canada Pavillion The 6,000-square-meter Canada Pavilion, among the biggest at the site, will feature an exhibition themed “The Living City: Inclusive, Sustainable, Creative.” It is expected to welcome up to 5.5 million people or 30,000 visitors per day during the six-month Expo period. The pavilion will be anchored by an open public place and surrounded by three large structures (read more…) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-135503</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-135503</guid>
		<description>Well at least it&#039;s not a log cabin - but I bet there&#039;s a Mountie and a beaver in there somewhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least it&#8217;s not a log cabin &#8211; but I bet there&#8217;s a Mountie and a beaver in there somewhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canada Pavillion for Shanghai Expo 2010 &#171; Kinda Like This&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-128358</link>
		<dc:creator>Canada Pavillion for Shanghai Expo 2010 &#171; Kinda Like This&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-128358</guid>
		<description>[...] Canada Pavillion for Shanghai Expo 2010 &#124; ArchDaily. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canada Pavillion for Shanghai Expo 2010 | ArchDaily. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-127401</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-127401</guid>
		<description>I rather have an invisible building than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather have an invisible building than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dUFFY</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-111639</link>
		<dc:creator>dUFFY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-111639</guid>
		<description>Really Canada ? Was that the best one ? Didn&#039;t u guys discuss it ay? And like maybe not voted for the flashes dumbest geomorphic turd that fell in ur laps? Sure love Canada ay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Canada ? Was that the best one ? Didn&#8217;t u guys discuss it ay? And like maybe not voted for the flashes dumbest geomorphic turd that fell in ur laps? Sure love Canada ay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-102828</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-102828</guid>
		<description>Good content, thanks for sharing it with us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good content, thanks for sharing it with us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drem</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-98070</link>
		<dc:creator>Drem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-98070</guid>
		<description>a lot of people like MacMansion to...  the design of that pavilion is a bit weak.

Football team can fill in 100 000 places stadium and amaze them... why not a design by a football team?? you never know migh be amazing to... There is some very nice pavilion (concept design etc) for 2010 expo but the canadian one is not one of them...  The cirque du soleil is still stucked in 1980 1990 attidude toward design and this attemp to get out of it is not an happy one and lack any real intensity and rigorousness ... the show inside might be great (they are a circus they are used to making show) but the building itself look like an unfinished draft.

It is not because we have the technology to build everything that every thing is great and it not because a Canadian wood is used to clad a building that it make the building a great canadian work of art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot of people like MacMansion to&#8230;  the design of that pavilion is a bit weak.</p>
<p>Football team can fill in 100 000 places stadium and amaze them&#8230; why not a design by a football team?? you never know migh be amazing to&#8230; There is some very nice pavilion (concept design etc) for 2010 expo but the canadian one is not one of them&#8230;  The cirque du soleil is still stucked in 1980 1990 attidude toward design and this attemp to get out of it is not an happy one and lack any real intensity and rigorousness &#8230; the show inside might be great (they are a circus they are used to making show) but the building itself look like an unfinished draft.</p>
<p>It is not because we have the technology to build everything that every thing is great and it not because a Canadian wood is used to clad a building that it make the building a great canadian work of art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-98004</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-98004</guid>
		<description>ahahah
right man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahahah<br />
right man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topnotch</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-95152</link>
		<dc:creator>Topnotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-95152</guid>
		<description>Let me get this right. All the people on this blog are a lot better then all the architects in the entire expo ... what a bunch of looser you are. How can you pretend to be even close to these guys . If you are blogging how bad the others are... maybe its time for you to get a real job! 

For the Canadian pavilion, The cirque knows how to move people in - deliver a great time- move people out and give them something to remember.  They never failed and you can be sure it will be amazing. 35000 people everyday will go through it.
The design of the pavilion represent two arms holding people, the outside is made of wood from british columbia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this right. All the people on this blog are a lot better then all the architects in the entire expo &#8230; what a bunch of looser you are. How can you pretend to be even close to these guys . If you are blogging how bad the others are&#8230; maybe its time for you to get a real job! </p>
<p>For the Canadian pavilion, The cirque knows how to move people in &#8211; deliver a great time- move people out and give them something to remember.  They never failed and you can be sure it will be amazing. 35000 people everyday will go through it.<br />
The design of the pavilion represent two arms holding people, the outside is made of wood from british columbia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krisztin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-82528</link>
		<dc:creator>krisztin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-82528</guid>
		<description>i agree ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Coleridge</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-87276</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Coleridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-87276</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Canadian government fails to promote canadian architects.  See: http://bit.ly/69DBaD and http://bit.ly/4DWhi5&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Canadian government fails to promote canadian architects.  See: <a href="http://bit.ly/69DBaD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/69DBaD</a> and <a href="http://bit.ly/4DWhi5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4DWhi5</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renante Solivar</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-87279</link>
		<dc:creator>Renante Solivar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-87279</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;What do you think of Canada&#039;s Expo Pavilion for Shanghai 2010? http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">What do you think of Canada&#39;s Expo Pavilion for Shanghai 2010? <a href="http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane in Wpg</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-52955</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane in Wpg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-52955</guid>
		<description>I keep going back and looking at the pictures.

I remain speechless!

OK! OK!  I can&#039;t say it in polite pulic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep going back and looking at the pictures.</p>
<p>I remain speechless!</p>
<p>OK! OK!  I can&#8217;t say it in polite pulic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 广州枫</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-52837</link>
		<dc:creator>广州枫</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-52837</guid>
		<description>路过.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>路过&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-51657</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-51657</guid>
		<description>Are there _any_ good pavilions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there _any_ good pavilions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottmft</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-50699</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottmft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-50699</guid>
		<description>Oh, Canada...how the hell did Cirque de Soleil get this gig?...We have real architects...really, we do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Canada&#8230;how the hell did Cirque de Soleil get this gig?&#8230;We have real architects&#8230;really, we do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hochelaga</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-49531</link>
		<dc:creator>hochelaga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-49531</guid>
		<description>We want names</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We want names</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luisol</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-48152</link>
		<dc:creator>Luisol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-48152</guid>
		<description>Touché mate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touché mate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: montreal</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/30570/canada-pavillion-for-shanghai-expo-2010/#comment-46819</link>
		<dc:creator>montreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=30570#comment-46819</guid>
		<description>Cirque du soleil did not in any way design this, they hired an architect to produce a design under their name, as they did for another project in japan. They never give credit to the actual designers, Cirque du soleil is a Circus not an Architecture office.
the last rendering is from a previous project that has nothing to do with the actual project.
Plus Cirque du soleil has modified the design to suit their taste after design was finalized by the architects (IE the big ugly Canada Logo on the façade)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cirque du soleil did not in any way design this, they hired an architect to produce a design under their name, as they did for another project in japan. They never give credit to the actual designers, Cirque du soleil is a Circus not an Architecture office.<br />
the last rendering is from a previous project that has nothing to do with the actual project.<br />
Plus Cirque du soleil has modified the design to suit their taste after design was finalized by the architects (IE the big ugly Canada Logo on the façade)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 13:06:04 by W3 Total Cache -->
