Follow us on twitter! twitter.com/archdaily

Newlands Community Centre / CCM Architects

By Nico Saieh — Filed under: Public Facilities , Selected , , ,
 

newlands12

Architect: CCM Architects
Location: Newlands, Wellington New Zealand
Design Team : Richard Almand, Guy Cleverley, Dongsei Kim, Thanh Ngyuen
Project Managers: Wellington City Council
Client: Wellington City Council
Engineers: Spencer Holmes Structural, Michael Stretton Building Services
Landscape Design: John Powell
Project year: 2006-2008
Photographs: Paul McRedie

newlands1 newlands22 newlands31 newlands34


This project is a community centre for the people in the outer residential suburb of Newlands, Wellington. The site is at the back of a small suburban shopping centre and immediately adjacent a tavern (it is actually built on one of the taverns old carpark areas.) CCM Architects was commissioned to provide a design that met the aspirations of the Newlands Community.

newlands9

Carried out over a period of two years the issues were many and varied. The design solutions needed to address the following issues

  1. Identity; This is a strong community who wanted to have pride in their community centre.
  2. Urban Design; The site is at the back of an older suburban shopping area and the urban form needed transform and reinforce a street presence from what was essentially a sea of asphalt.
  3. Site Contour and Orientation; The site had a cross fall of three metres. This needed to accommodate level access for people with disabilities.
  4. Street Presence; The site is situated on a back street. It was critical that the building be easily identified from a distance. The 3 metre cross fall dictated the entry location to the southern side of the building in the right of way adjacent the tavern. So it was a critical issue to ensure the entrance although around a corner, was signalled from the street and easy to locate for visitors.
  5. Community; With many varied and competing interests the design had to provide a functionality that accommodated the communities outline brief.
  6. Cost; Being publicly funded the project required transparent processes that were cost effective.
  7. Ongoing Maintenance; The project needed to be easily maintained over the long term.

newlands33

The building has been open since late last year and is proving a destination and popular venue for the community.

 

1 comment »

Links to this article »

Leave a Reply »

Want to have your own avatar? Get yours at Gravatar.

Latest Comments »

hey i want to make thesis on futuristic sustainable city??? so plz nybody abt...[+]
hey i just wnt to whats yhe function of the external laminating shell that has been...[+]
Fun can be synonymous with the gravity of any discourse. If you read my...[+]
There is no blame to be placed on any architect… though...[+]
Do not always blame the architect for this stuff. Too often people WANT...[+]
can u plz send the details of this competetion.[+]
The Broken Pediment has nothing to do with a styalistic gesture. But I...[+]
It’s sad that Poland’s national identity and thousand-years-rich-history...[+]
Superb article on the Biennale! Tough what I really was expecting was a more...[+]
Being able to read helps —– Reiterative feedback and forth...[+]
The composition is very...[+]
What’s the software?[+]

Browse by category »

Our partners »

Browse by date »

Friends »

Proudly hosted at »