Comments on: Prada Transformer, Position 2: Cinema

By: billel

billel — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:18:13 +0000

need plans and dimensions of kaufmann house

By: Klaus

Klaus — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:16:26 +0000

Prada Transformer in Klaustoon: http://klaustoon.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/the-man-on-the-moon/

By: rodrigo tello

rodrigo tello — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:02:58 +0000

ale gaddor

he also studied architecture as you and me

By: Sonic

Sonic — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:42:23 +0000

…so polemic…..

By: ale gaddor

ale gaddor — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:37:45 +0000

please, anyone out there
please,, stop this journalist (koolhaas) who’s trying to do anything to get our attention,,,and the more press possible
please,,, someone tell him

By: Steven

Steven — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:21:28 +0000

Some of you critics seem to take this too seriously. Architecture is not the be all end all. It’s important, but it is also fun and commercial and defensive and practical and impractical and lively and provocative and banal and so much more and less. None of it is permanent. They’re just buildings.

By: Troy Lemieur

Troy Lemieur — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:52:58 +0000

Why can’t things be so literal?
…We can banter and confer and explain and contemplate for ages, but hardly anything will be concluded. Thus is the way of architecture.

By: davvid

davvid — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:05:45 +0000

or is it Charlie Kaufman’s take on architecture?

By: Drunkmuse

Drunkmuse — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:10:57 +0000

It’s akin to taking a building and going through the gymnastics of flipping it on it’s side just cause you need to be creative about programmatic elements. “Oh look dear, our kitchen floor is now the headboard in the beadroom” Well……It is just that. Bluntly non-creative. A transformative peice needn’t be so literal. Well…I bet Rem will try to pass this one of as a “tongue-in cheek” peice. It’s the Andy Kaufmann’s take on architecture. Yea Right!

By: William Bell

William Bell — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:04:57 +0000

Yeah!!! Come strong haters…