<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orange Office / Sander Architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:32:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-44319</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-44319</guid>
		<description>Smart idea. I like it! It attracts people&#039;s attention and its environmentally friendly. Roof garden is smart as well! HVAC is great! I&#039;m into &lt;a href=&quot;http://geothermalsolutions.info&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Geothermal Technology &lt;/a&gt; myself and it is a great idea! 
Great building!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart idea. I like it! It attracts people&#8217;s attention and its environmentally friendly. Roof garden is smart as well! HVAC is great! I&#8217;m into <a href="http://geothermalsolutions.info" rel="nofollow"> Geothermal Technology </a> myself and it is a great idea!<br />
Great building!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poke</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-42296</link>
		<dc:creator>poke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-42296</guid>
		<description>mrciscous: I think you are giving too much credit to Sander by grouping him with H&amp;dM.  This projects lacks the sophistication of the Signal Box skin treatment.  but you might be right if you were saying that this project is a sophomoric ripoff/inspiration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mrciscous: I think you are giving too much credit to Sander by grouping him with H&amp;dM.  This projects lacks the sophistication of the Signal Box skin treatment.  but you might be right if you were saying that this project is a sophomoric ripoff/inspiration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-42040</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-42040</guid>
		<description>I live less than a mile from this monstrosity and every day I drive by I lament the early days of its construction when the basic form seemed to give me hope that a nice piece of modern architecture was in the works.  The biggest issue with this building is the abysmal detailing.  Nevermind those clumsy vertical concrete walls that the mass above rests on, or the poor placement and routing of utilities in the parking garage....the entry is perhaps the least resolved and considered aspect of the project.  I can&#039;t imagine anyone wanting to work in that building.  Frosted glass with no clear view to the exterior is inhumane.  It&#039;s been &#039;almost finished&#039; for a year now.

Sorry, it&#039;s just plain bad.  I don&#039;t even mind the unfinished look but that orange grid is far too open and does nothing in terms of measurable performance regardless of the claims.  The frosted glass, maybe, but not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live less than a mile from this monstrosity and every day I drive by I lament the early days of its construction when the basic form seemed to give me hope that a nice piece of modern architecture was in the works.  The biggest issue with this building is the abysmal detailing.  Nevermind those clumsy vertical concrete walls that the mass above rests on, or the poor placement and routing of utilities in the parking garage&#8230;.the entry is perhaps the least resolved and considered aspect of the project.  I can&#8217;t imagine anyone wanting to work in that building.  Frosted glass with no clear view to the exterior is inhumane.  It&#8217;s been &#8216;almost finished&#8217; for a year now.</p>
<p>Sorry, it&#8217;s just plain bad.  I don&#8217;t even mind the unfinished look but that orange grid is far too open and does nothing in terms of measurable performance regardless of the claims.  The frosted glass, maybe, but not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StructureHub Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-41882</link>
		<dc:creator>StructureHub Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-41882</guid>
		<description>Wonderfully original!  I&#039;ve seen plenty of screens, metal mesh and otherwise, but this is certainly a unique take on that conceit.  It&#039;ll be a beast to keep the netting and all those nooks clean of soot though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderfully original!  I&#8217;ve seen plenty of screens, metal mesh and otherwise, but this is certainly a unique take on that conceit.  It&#8217;ll be a beast to keep the netting and all those nooks clean of soot though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: architte</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-41874</link>
		<dc:creator>architte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-41874</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m familiar with this building and drive by it frequently. I just thought it was under-financed and work had stopped, over a year ago. &quot;... Marc has it exactly right! as a designer working in Venice, I drive by this on a regular basis as well, and it does look like the perenially unfinished bldg! Any color but orange would have better!! Orange is so 2005 ;) j/k, but it is the color of construction.
And, I have to add, too many architects in Venice/LA trying to do interesting things with color and failing MISERABLY.
Construction admin is essential to ensure everything coordinates through the value engineering exercise...Do you trust your contractor to pick a substitute? For Santa Monica residents, case in point is the new parking structure on 4th and the 10. ick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m familiar with this building and drive by it frequently. I just thought it was under-financed and work had stopped, over a year ago. &#8220;&#8230; Marc has it exactly right! as a designer working in Venice, I drive by this on a regular basis as well, and it does look like the perenially unfinished bldg! Any color but orange would have better!! Orange is so 2005 ;) j/k, but it is the color of construction.<br />
And, I have to add, too many architects in Venice/LA trying to do interesting things with color and failing MISERABLY.<br />
Construction admin is essential to ensure everything coordinates through the value engineering exercise&#8230;Do you trust your contractor to pick a substitute? For Santa Monica residents, case in point is the new parking structure on 4th and the 10. ick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-41862</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-41862</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m familiar with this building and drive by it frequently. I just thought it was under-financed and work had stopped, over a year ago. With that said, that is how it looks...like a poor-man&#039;s Morphosis knock-off. The most confusing aspect has to be the cost put into staggering the concrete at each floor. I can&#039;t speak for the inside or roof but the exterior is a failed urban experiment.

The &quot;green movement&quot; necessarily does no want to make this project the poster-child for their cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m familiar with this building and drive by it frequently. I just thought it was under-financed and work had stopped, over a year ago. With that said, that is how it looks&#8230;like a poor-man&#8217;s Morphosis knock-off. The most confusing aspect has to be the cost put into staggering the concrete at each floor. I can&#8217;t speak for the inside or roof but the exterior is a failed urban experiment.</p>
<p>The &#8220;green movement&#8221; necessarily does no want to make this project the poster-child for their cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sullka</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-41860</link>
		<dc:creator>sullka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-41860</guid>
		<description>You just can&#039;t wrap a mesh over an structural skeleton and think it would look trendy.

It will only look like an unifinished building in constant renovation.

Neat idea, poor execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just can&#8217;t wrap a mesh over an structural skeleton and think it would look trendy.</p>
<p>It will only look like an unifinished building in constant renovation.</p>
<p>Neat idea, poor execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hertz</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-41857</link>
		<dc:creator>Hertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-41857</guid>
		<description>you are one cheesy dude Mr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are one cheesy dude Mr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RT</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-41854</link>
		<dc:creator>RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-41854</guid>
		<description>The orange net is gonna look like hell in a year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The orange net is gonna look like hell in a year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanamArq</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/28233/orange-office-sander-architects/#comment-41850</link>
		<dc:creator>PanamArq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=28233#comment-41850</guid>
		<description>very cool, the ground level is a bit disappointing though, it looks like a parking garage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very cool, the ground level is a bit disappointing though, it looks like a parking garage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
