<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site One / Elenberg Fraser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:30:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: darkfray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-49258</link>
		<dc:creator>darkfray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-49258</guid>
		<description>Agree,the photo is wondful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree,the photo is wondful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-43674</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-43674</guid>
		<description>nice sunset photos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice sunset photos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uli</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-40962</link>
		<dc:creator>Uli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-40962</guid>
		<description>@The Hawk
No I am not saying that. I am just saying, there are interesting designs in architecture already, which should appear more often in built projects. Seeing a few variations on those can also help to compare costs, detail solutions, modularity etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Hawk<br />
No I am not saying that. I am just saying, there are interesting designs in architecture already, which should appear more often in built projects. Seeing a few variations on those can also help to compare costs, detail solutions, modularity etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c. wee</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-40918</link>
		<dc:creator>c. wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-40918</guid>
		<description>brings us to a question inherent in a lot of works now -

when is it a &#039;copy&#039; and when is it an &#039;inspiration&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brings us to a question inherent in a lot of works now -</p>
<p>when is it a &#8216;copy&#8217; and when is it an &#8216;inspiration&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-40910</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-40910</guid>
		<description>Herzog and de Meuron also did a couple of facades very similar to this a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herzog and de Meuron also did a couple of facades very similar to this a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-40899</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-40899</guid>
		<description>Are you telling us this is a copy uli?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you telling us this is a copy uli?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uli</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-40893</link>
		<dc:creator>Uli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-40893</guid>
		<description>We designed this facade at 2000 at OMAAsia/RAD, based on our OMA Lille Congessexpo. It is a beautiful design, and we are happy, if offices take reference to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We designed this facade at 2000 at OMAAsia/RAD, based on our OMA Lille Congessexpo. It is a beautiful design, and we are happy, if offices take reference to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27732/site-one-elenberg-fraser/#comment-40858</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27732#comment-40858</guid>
		<description>I really like some parts of this project, the main picture is beautiful. The floorplans seem very forced though, and parts of it look quite tacky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like some parts of this project, the main picture is beautiful. The floorplans seem very forced though, and parts of it look quite tacky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
