<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Petit Bayle / Meld Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:04:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Glenn Phipps</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/#comment-41163</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Glenn Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27675#comment-41163</guid>
		<description>Everyone seems to like the form.  I have to say I don&#039;t understand that.  To me this looks like a cat-litter box or a roach motel.  I can see no relationship to anything in the vernacular and no particular reason behind any of these decisions.  To me this seems like a waste of the natural beauty of the countryside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone seems to like the form.  I have to say I don&#8217;t understand that.  To me this looks like a cat-litter box or a roach motel.  I can see no relationship to anything in the vernacular and no particular reason behind any of these decisions.  To me this seems like a waste of the natural beauty of the countryside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sullka</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/#comment-41143</link>
		<dc:creator>sullka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27675#comment-41143</guid>
		<description>Nice house.

I just find somethnig rather strange.

Why all the bedroom doors are facing the wrong way?

Might be just a drawing error, or maybe not, if so, isn&#039;t it strange that they open the doors toward the walls instead of opening them towards the space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice house.</p>
<p>I just find somethnig rather strange.</p>
<p>Why all the bedroom doors are facing the wrong way?</p>
<p>Might be just a drawing error, or maybe not, if so, isn&#8217;t it strange that they open the doors toward the walls instead of opening them towards the space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpasez</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/#comment-41112</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpasez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27675#comment-41112</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bummer about that interior, because the form, organization, and concept for the house are all great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bummer about that interior, because the form, organization, and concept for the house are all great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THN</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/#comment-41097</link>
		<dc:creator>THN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27675#comment-41097</guid>
		<description>Yes, the form and green thinking is really nice but I think I have to disagree on the materials and colors. If it would to have all the colors and floor materials you expected I think it would be to obvious. Now it kind of tikles you a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the form and green thinking is really nice but I think I have to disagree on the materials and colors. If it would to have all the colors and floor materials you expected I think it would be to obvious. Now it kind of tikles you a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/#comment-41094</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27675#comment-41094</guid>
		<description>I also like the general form (the section is particularly nice) but find the interior images to be pretty bad. I don&#039;t even mind the exposed particle board or whatever it is but the combination of the board and yellow lighting and furniture is atrocious. The floor is also poor in material and color.

The concept and attention to sustainability is admirable though as is the general design. Its a very nice building that could have been amazing with a slightly redesigned interior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like the general form (the section is particularly nice) but find the interior images to be pretty bad. I don&#8217;t even mind the exposed particle board or whatever it is but the combination of the board and yellow lighting and furniture is atrocious. The floor is also poor in material and color.</p>
<p>The concept and attention to sustainability is admirable though as is the general design. Its a very nice building that could have been amazing with a slightly redesigned interior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3d</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/#comment-41083</link>
		<dc:creator>3d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27675#comment-41083</guid>
		<description>Yep, it&#039;s a good example of old vs new architecture. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it&#8217;s a good example of old vs new architecture. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27675/petit-bayle-meld-architecture/#comment-41078</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27675#comment-41078</guid>
		<description>Nice ext. shape. We got in Poland many that kind of projects from late 70&#039;s. But that interior is horrible. Like live in recycled paper box.. Its a example for: How to kill the living space..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice ext. shape. We got in Poland many that kind of projects from late 70&#8217;s. But that interior is horrible. Like live in recycled paper box.. Its a example for: How to kill the living space..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
