<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bridge House / Max Pritchard Architect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:20:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Living Bridges &#171; PROJECTIONS</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-57974</link>
		<dc:creator>Living Bridges &#171; PROJECTIONS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-57974</guid>
		<description>[...] Bridge House by Max Pritchard Architect via Arch Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bridge House by Max Pritchard Architect via Arch Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fundgrube (6) &#171; Komische Welt</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-48784</link>
		<dc:creator>Fundgrube (6) &#171; Komische Welt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-48784</guid>
		<description>[...] (stolen @archdaily) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (stolen @archdaily) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanya</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-42599</link>
		<dc:creator>tanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-42599</guid>
		<description>marvellous..1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marvellous..1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loosman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-41923</link>
		<dc:creator>loosman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-41923</guid>
		<description>ok AMR - Loosman apologises for any offence.  We are all entitled to our opinions as you say. I freely admit that I am enjoying the vigorous debate and discourse in architecture enabled by this site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok AMR &#8211; Loosman apologises for any offence.  We are all entitled to our opinions as you say. I freely admit that I am enjoying the vigorous debate and discourse in architecture enabled by this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMR</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-41824</link>
		<dc:creator>AMR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-41824</guid>
		<description>Please tell me how I am embarrassing all australians loosman? By responding to someone who did not even bother to read the accompanying text perhaps?
I did not bring Glenn into the discussion loosman. Don&#039;t bother replying if you don&#039;t read the posts before. 
Perhaps the clients wanted a connection with their land on each side of the creek, we will never know as we were not party to the client/architect discussions.
Gimmick in your eyes, solution in other eyes perhaps.
I don&#039;t have to agree with you or anyone else. I don&#039;t like a lot of Glenn&#039;s work, nor do I like a lot of Max&#039;s work. Just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me how I am embarrassing all australians loosman? By responding to someone who did not even bother to read the accompanying text perhaps?<br />
I did not bring Glenn into the discussion loosman. Don&#8217;t bother replying if you don&#8217;t read the posts before.<br />
Perhaps the clients wanted a connection with their land on each side of the creek, we will never know as we were not party to the client/architect discussions.<br />
Gimmick in your eyes, solution in other eyes perhaps.<br />
I don&#8217;t have to agree with you or anyone else. I don&#8217;t like a lot of Glenn&#8217;s work, nor do I like a lot of Max&#8217;s work. Just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loosman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-41785</link>
		<dc:creator>loosman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-41785</guid>
		<description>AMR - you&#039;re embarressing all australians.

Keep Murcutt out of this -he never designed a bridge house.

Seidler and McIntyre did however, and more recently so did Godsell and Rosevear, but they learnt from Seidler......

Everything that is beautiful about this house could have bene achieved by parking it alongside the top of the bank, and letting the occupants feel connected to the ground.
The bridge is just a gimmick - who would want to live over a creek without a sense of connection to the earth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMR &#8211; you&#8217;re embarressing all australians.</p>
<p>Keep Murcutt out of this -he never designed a bridge house.</p>
<p>Seidler and McIntyre did however, and more recently so did Godsell and Rosevear, but they learnt from Seidler&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Everything that is beautiful about this house could have bene achieved by parking it alongside the top of the bank, and letting the occupants feel connected to the ground.<br />
The bridge is just a gimmick &#8211; who would want to live over a creek without a sense of connection to the earth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMR</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-41628</link>
		<dc:creator>AMR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-41628</guid>
		<description>No Patrick, I was being sarcastic to Nikola, if you read all our posts it might make sense. 
Then again I could just be ignorant.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Patrick, I was being sarcastic to Nikola, if you read all our posts it might make sense.<br />
Then again I could just be ignorant&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Irwin</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-41586</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Irwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-41586</guid>
		<description>I live in a house without air-conditioning.
We do have very good ventilation (architect designed) and a small gas heater in the living room.
Is that a total lie?
Or are you ignorant, AMR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in a house without air-conditioning.<br />
We do have very good ventilation (architect designed) and a small gas heater in the living room.<br />
Is that a total lie?<br />
Or are you ignorant, AMR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AMR</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-41567</link>
		<dc:creator>AMR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-41567</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the bit bit about no air conditioning must be a total lie.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the bit bit about no air conditioning must be a total lie&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27470/bridge-house-max-pritchard-architect/#comment-41497</link>
		<dc:creator>I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27470#comment-41497</guid>
		<description>Terry Glenn Phipps=zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry Glenn Phipps=zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
