<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Roofs for Melbourne / 1:1 architects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:25:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-399312</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 03:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-399312</guid>
		<description>I think that the Green Roof’s for Melbourne initiative is positive development not because of its physical impact on the environment, but more because of its psychological impact on society. By using good architectural design we can encourage people to ‘want’ eco-design to be a part of their buildings and lives. If we can successfully design an environmentally integrated relaxation area on the top of several buildings in a single city, then the local society will recognise that the potential of eco-retrofitting is not only for the benefit of the environment; but also holds value in individual health and the wellbeing of the society at large. When society at large ‘wants’ more solutions, then we have successfully paved the way for more serious eco-retrofitting in the future. This is the first step, to manipulate society as architects, to ‘want’ what they ‘require’. I hope this project gets done by another architect soon and is pitched and better designed with this understanding in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Green Roof’s for Melbourne initiative is positive development not because of its physical impact on the environment, but more because of its psychological impact on society. By using good architectural design we can encourage people to ‘want’ eco-design to be a part of their buildings and lives. If we can successfully design an environmentally integrated relaxation area on the top of several buildings in a single city, then the local society will recognise that the potential of eco-retrofitting is not only for the benefit of the environment; but also holds value in individual health and the wellbeing of the society at large. When society at large ‘wants’ more solutions, then we have successfully paved the way for more serious eco-retrofitting in the future. This is the first step, to manipulate society as architects, to ‘want’ what they ‘require’. I hope this project gets done by another architect soon and is pitched and better designed with this understanding in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: budi</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-40606</link>
		<dc:creator>budi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-40606</guid>
		<description>Good Work. The Community need something that can motivate them to be more sensitive to the environment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Work. The Community need something that can motivate them to be more sensitive to the environment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gagan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-40496</link>
		<dc:creator>gagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-40496</guid>
		<description>well done... its high time we integrate features like these in our dead AC offices.. such green areas can prove relaxing in our offices..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done&#8230; its high time we integrate features like these in our dead AC offices.. such green areas can prove relaxing in our offices..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eco boy</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-40203</link>
		<dc:creator>eco boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-40203</guid>
		<description>perhaps you should read the text first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps you should read the text first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-40145</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-40145</guid>
		<description>in my opinion, this &quot;green solution&quot; is not very helpful at all.  Its just as bad as a design intent similar to slapping on solar panels on top of a roof.  More importantly, is the timber recycled lumber and does the water collected by the plans and structure filter back into a gray water recyclable tank? I feel the intent towards sustainability was not fully explored and thus the concept of the project suffered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in my opinion, this &#8220;green solution&#8221; is not very helpful at all.  Its just as bad as a design intent similar to slapping on solar panels on top of a roof.  More importantly, is the timber recycled lumber and does the water collected by the plans and structure filter back into a gray water recyclable tank? I feel the intent towards sustainability was not fully explored and thus the concept of the project suffered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D&A Metafeed</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-89152</link>
		<dc:creator>D&A Metafeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-89152</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;#architecture Green Roofs for Melbourne / 1:1 architects: 
1:1 Architects shared their design idea .. http://bit.ly/3FJGld&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">#architecture Green Roofs for Melbourne / 1:1 architects:<br />
1:1 Architects shared their design idea .. <a href="http://bit.ly/3FJGld" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3FJGld</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S SOK</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-89168</link>
		<dc:creator>S SOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-89168</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Green Roofs for Melbourne / 1:1 architects http://bit.ly/FabOB (via @archdaily)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Green Roofs for Melbourne / 1:1 architects <a href="http://bit.ly/FabOB" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/FabOB</a> (via @archdaily)</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Gorman</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/27147/green-roofs-for-melbourne-11-architects/#comment-160499</link>
		<dc:creator>William Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=27147#comment-160499</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @archdaily: Green Roofs for Melbourne / 1:1 architects http://bit.ly/FabOB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @archdaily: Green Roofs for Melbourne / 1:1 architects <a href="http://bit.ly/FabOB" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/FabOB</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 10:31:04 by W3 Total Cache -->
