Comments on: Kübler House / 57 STUDIO

By: Marta Krivosikova

Marta Krivosikova — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:57:55 +0000

Kübler House / 57 STUDIO #architecture http://t.co/7cXlDjO @archdaily

By: Uros Smolnikar

Uros Smolnikar — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:33:20 +0000

Kübler House / 57 STUDIO | ArchDaily http://t.co/1jBx5dO via @archdaily

By: rainsea

rainsea — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:31:44 +0000

Kübler House / 57 STUDIO | ArchDaily: http://bit.ly/b8Nznm (via @rehagercek)

By: REHA GERÇEK

REHA GERÇEK — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:19:49 +0000

Kübler House / 57 STUDIO | ArchDaily: http://bit.ly/b8Nznm

By: Andrew Geber

Andrew Geber — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:50:37 +0000

well it does look like a neatly put together studio

By: Casa Kübler by 57 STUDIO | Minimalismi

Casa Kübler by 57 STUDIO | Minimalismi — Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:47:06 +0000

[...] Some peripheral walls are prolonged to direct the views and close the house against the winds and nearby streets. In addition, the slabs extend as eaves to protect tall windows from the sun and to cover the terraces. These architectonic elements radicalize the opening of the interior spaces, deepening their presence from the outside. [via] [...]

By: Kübler House/57 Studio | SNEAKHYPE - your daily dose of dopeness -- online magazine of fresh kicks, art, clothes, culture, and ideas

Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:47:41 +0000

[...] This bad-ass bachelor pad is actually a single unit house but i’m fairly certain that if you lived in this house you would have a lot of guests sleeping over. It is located in Santiago, Chile and the whole house is designed around a padio in the center of the house. The architects hoped to incorporate the surrounding nature into the house as much as possible. Check out some more pictures after the jump.Via Archdaily [...]

By: cad

cad — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:19:20 +0000

The photographer got there late and spent all night taking picture. The mosquitoes were not helping him achieve the shots he wanted so the hell with it.

By: richie

richie — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:26:41 +0000

I really don’t like labels on the first floor, they are like obstacules and make everything unconfortable and also unsecure.those galactic labels in those 80′s houses are the most horrible mistakes in the hole history af architecture.please avoid them.nothing better than a clear flat lebel.is the best way of displacement for human beings.

By: twentythreeseven » Kübler House

twentythreeseven » Kübler House — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:20:31 +0000

[...] (via ArchDaily) [...]

By: Emilio

Emilio — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:10:12 +0000

I like the idea of this building although is true that without labells is very difficult to understand it. The research about how a cloister could turn into an open system, is the best approach of this house.

By: Travis

Travis — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:31:00 +0000

I think that in the future, no floorplan should be without labelling — how am I supposed to evaluate the organization of spaces without knowing the functions of each space (in its most simplistic form: the label)? We can disagree with the era of the decor (90s or whatever) and the time at which the photograph was taken, but if the discussion is meant to be critical of the architecture itself, then I think we need at least need to understand the plan.

By: richie

richie — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:48:28 +0000

i really like this house.i will love to live in a house like this.
loving big windows and hating litle spots that feel sophocant spaces, this house is very nice at this point.
loving independence structure, this house have it.
i really like some details like the stair, seem a long time havn’t seen something that light.Most of the stairs that are independence from the walls are grose and also horrible, in this case is fine and nice.
Seem a lot to Master R.Neutra (Kauffman’s house)wich is other plus.Some houses seem badly like ,i don,t want to mention this adjetive.
It’s a very nice house whit fine finishing.
The only litle thing that i don’t like, is the handraila and veranda of this exterior upstair, but it doesn’t affect the total nice dwell.

By: BAJ

BAJ — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:11:57 +0000

I don’t understand the above comments except to say that we architectural voyers always want more; in this case more interior shots, more daytime photos, more details. It may be that this client spent his all on the beautiful architecture (which shows so well in these evening and night-time photos) and did not have enough left for interior furnishings after including the built-ins, etc. and someone decided the balance of available interior shots didn’t do the exquisite building justice, or maybe the occupants simply wished to retain a minimum of privacy.

I think this design is quite significant. The inclusion of so much exterior space makes the home feel so much larger than the enclosed volume. It also is rather well-proportioned for a four bedroom plus maid’s quarters home (i.e. not too awfully large). Excellent; but we always want more! Thanks for sharing.

By: thomas foral

thomas foral — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:15:19 +0000

Kübler House / 57 STUDIO | ArchDaily – http://shar.es/d4rD

By: INawe

INawe — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 06:13:24 +0000

It just seems like something is being hidden on purpose as if the building looks its best only at dusk or in the evening.

By: zaikoski

zaikoski — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:07:19 +0000

lighten up. The light works well in some of them to interior to the outside instead of the usual inside out. Yes, some of the shadows are blocked up and a mix of daylight shots would be nice but sheesh….

By: Carlo Enrico

Carlo Enrico — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:38:38 +0000

Architects: 57 STUDIO – Maurizio Angelini / Benjamín Oportot Location: Colina, Chile. e agora? essa ou a da Polônia? http://bit.ly/yIy7o

By: INawe

INawe — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:55:58 +0000

What is with these weird morning photos of the house? Can we get some real daytime photos please? The only good shot is the first picture like Spelli says.

Photographer fail.

By: Spelli

Spelli — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:17:59 +0000

I was impressed by the first picture but the rest kind of went downhill from there. parts of the house look worn and kind of 90′sh