<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tracasa Office Building / AH Asociados</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: USCTrojan90</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/#comment-422456</link>
		<dc:creator>USCTrojan90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=25555#comment-422456</guid>
		<description>Would someone like to attempt to explain how this &quot;...building has been planned as a well worked “pile” which rests on the terrain, adapting to its natural contours&quot; is achieved?? When I think of a building adapting its surrounding natural contours I think of BIG&#039;s Greenlands National Gallery of Art, not this slightly decorated concrete block sitting on a plinth. Furthermore, If they were referring to how the building interacts with the ground plane, and not its overall form reacting to the natural contours, then it is even less spectacular then I first thought. Simply allowing your building to step down a hill is not innovative. 

Only positive I can think of is the clean sleek use of materials. It does bring to thought the sensation of taking a deep breath of clean cool air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would someone like to attempt to explain how this &#8220;&#8230;building has been planned as a well worked “pile” which rests on the terrain, adapting to its natural contours&#8221; is achieved?? When I think of a building adapting its surrounding natural contours I think of BIG&#8217;s Greenlands National Gallery of Art, not this slightly decorated concrete block sitting on a plinth. Furthermore, If they were referring to how the building interacts with the ground plane, and not its overall form reacting to the natural contours, then it is even less spectacular then I first thought. Simply allowing your building to step down a hill is not innovative. </p>
<p>Only positive I can think of is the clean sleek use of materials. It does bring to thought the sensation of taking a deep breath of clean cool air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Materiaal inspiratie: beton - Aureon architectuur weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/#comment-53429</link>
		<dc:creator>Materiaal inspiratie: beton - Aureon architectuur weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=25555#comment-53429</guid>
		<description>[...] Kaal beton als gevelbekleding bij dit kantoorgebouw in Spanje. Meer info. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kaal beton als gevelbekleding bij dit kantoorgebouw in Spanje. Meer info. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/#comment-38765</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=25555#comment-38765</guid>
		<description>Well, it certainly is not groundbreaking, but it looks habitable... As long as the client and the architect are cool with it... Just that maybe architects should not try to over justify their decisions with fancy notions of involving the townspeople and stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it certainly is not groundbreaking, but it looks habitable&#8230; As long as the client and the architect are cool with it&#8230; Just that maybe architects should not try to over justify their decisions with fancy notions of involving the townspeople and stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanamArq</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/#comment-38726</link>
		<dc:creator>PanamArq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=25555#comment-38726</guid>
		<description>i dont think any &quot;townsfolk&quot; will go here without any programs to attract them.  It is silly to assume that just because of architectural gestures that the building will be more friendly to its neighbors.  it looks as if conference or classrooms face the &quot;public square&quot;.  why not a cafe here if they are attempting to create a public square since these walls will be covered most of the time if they are classrooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think any &#8220;townsfolk&#8221; will go here without any programs to attract them.  It is silly to assume that just because of architectural gestures that the building will be more friendly to its neighbors.  it looks as if conference or classrooms face the &#8220;public square&#8221;.  why not a cafe here if they are attempting to create a public square since these walls will be covered most of the time if they are classrooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marco</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/#comment-38715</link>
		<dc:creator>marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=25555#comment-38715</guid>
		<description>Sorry buddy! not because you study &quot;arch&quot; that you &quot;know&quot;... some people have a whole career behind them and don&#039;t even &quot;know&quot;!
It is a beautifull building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry buddy! not because you study &#8220;arch&#8221; that you &#8220;know&#8221;&#8230; some people have a whole career behind them and don&#8217;t even &#8220;know&#8221;!<br />
It is a beautifull building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/25555/tracasa-office-building-ah-asociados/#comment-38709</link>
		<dc:creator>x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=25555#comment-38709</guid>
		<description>it doesn&#039;t feet in the surrounding and it&#039;s not sold, it is a rubish design or at least as the photos show, sorry, but true, i study arch and know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it doesn&#8217;t feet in the surrounding and it&#8217;s not sold, it is a rubish design or at least as the photos show, sorry, but true, i study arch and know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 15:56:35 by W3 Total Cache -->
