<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Topotek 1 for Imperial War Museum North</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/</link>
	<description>Architecture News: The latest buildings, projects and competitions every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37849</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37849</guid>
		<description>Perfect for a war museum and rather impressive too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect for a war museum and rather impressive too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z-Buffer</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37712</link>
		<dc:creator>Z-Buffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37712</guid>
		<description>crvs of y=sinx,y=cosx and y=x^2
great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>crvs of y=sinx,y=cosx and y=x^2<br />
great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otis</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37672</link>
		<dc:creator>otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37672</guid>
		<description>lovely i hope we get to see more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lovely i hope we get to see more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiKe Mecanics</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37589</link>
		<dc:creator>MiKe Mecanics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37589</guid>
		<description>Well I think the addiction is horrible..:S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think the addiction is horrible..:S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2MACoff</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37521</link>
		<dc:creator>2MACoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37521</guid>
		<description>МНЕ ВАЩЕ НЕ НРАВИТСЯ ! ! ! а именно : какие-то непонятные (для меня) врезки непонятных форм ... смотрится в целом ДЕБИЛЬНО!!! какая война..? какая-то ХУЙНЯ...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>МНЕ ВАЩЕ НЕ НРАВИТСЯ ! ! ! а именно : какие-то непонятные (для меня) врезки непонятных форм &#8230; смотрится в целом ДЕБИЛЬНО!!! какая война..? какая-то ХУЙНЯ&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IP freely</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37497</link>
		<dc:creator>IP freely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37497</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t it beautiful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t it beautiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D&A Metafeed</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-87759</link>
		<dc:creator>D&A Metafeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-87759</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;#architecture Topotek 1 for Imperial War Museum North: 
Following an international design competiti.. http://bit.ly/NqFLz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">#architecture Topotek 1 for Imperial War Museum North:<br />
Following an international design competiti.. <a href="http://bit.ly/NqFLz" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/NqFLz</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Lemieur</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37492</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Lemieur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37492</guid>
		<description>Besides, this building isn&#039;t the focus of this post, It states that Topotek 1 is the preferred design team for the EXTERIOR spaces. 

All that aside, I feel that none of this project matters unless the parts that are supposed to be function ARE in fact, functional. As with all landscape design, I get pissed off if I have to walk all the way around a feature, instead of directly to where I&#039;m going. At my school, there is a huge peanut shaped planter right in the way, and there is no damn reason why it should even be there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides, this building isn&#8217;t the focus of this post, It states that Topotek 1 is the preferred design team for the EXTERIOR spaces. </p>
<p>All that aside, I feel that none of this project matters unless the parts that are supposed to be function ARE in fact, functional. As with all landscape design, I get pissed off if I have to walk all the way around a feature, instead of directly to where I&#8217;m going. At my school, there is a huge peanut shaped planter right in the way, and there is no damn reason why it should even be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Lemieur</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37491</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Lemieur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37491</guid>
		<description>D.Cacho, I&#039;m pretty sure they intended to use camouflage as a concept, and not a literal representation. Camouflage is a visual average of the surrounding landscape, and the external landscaping is the visual average of the landscapes that were fought on during the wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D.Cacho, I&#8217;m pretty sure they intended to use camouflage as a concept, and not a literal representation. Camouflage is a visual average of the surrounding landscape, and the external landscaping is the visual average of the landscapes that were fought on during the wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 16:08:78</title>
		<link>http://www.archdaily.com/24891/topotek-1-for-imperial-war-museum-north/#comment-37481</link>
		<dc:creator>16:08:78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.archdaily.com/?p=24891#comment-37481</guid>
		<description>Judging by the read, this building is a fake.

Originated as a competition for a war museum, Topotek 1 chose the idea of camouflage for their creative design. Nice, then contrasted with the renders I get the feeling that something is missing, what would it be... oh yeah THE CAMOUFLAGE !!!!!   The building is so evident that throws itself into the trash. Even worse doesn’t remind of a past war at all; instead, it does remind of how 2011 is going to look like.

D.Cacho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by the read, this building is a fake.</p>
<p>Originated as a competition for a war museum, Topotek 1 chose the idea of camouflage for their creative design. Nice, then contrasted with the renders I get the feeling that something is missing, what would it be&#8230; oh yeah THE CAMOUFLAGE !!!!!   The building is so evident that throws itself into the trash. Even worse doesn’t remind of a past war at all; instead, it does remind of how 2011 is going to look like.</p>
<p>D.Cacho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.archdaily.com @ 2012-02-10 10:52:13 by W3 Total Cache -->
